Suppr超能文献

比较纽约心脏协会心功能 IV 级患者与 III 级及以下患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术的早期和长期结局。

Comparison of Early and Long-Term Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients with New York Heart Association Functional Class IV to those in Class III and Less.

机构信息

Catheterization Laboratory, Cardiothoracic Department, Spedali Civili Brescia, Brescia, Italy.

Catheterization Laboratory, Cardiothoracic Department, Spedali Civili Brescia, Brescia, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2018 Nov 15;122(10):1718-1726. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Aug 21.

Abstract

Our aim was to investigate the impact of a baseline New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV on clinical outcomes of a large real-world population who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The primary end points were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and re-hospitalization, evaluated at the longest available follow-up and by means of a 3-month landmark analysis. The secondary end points were: change in NYHA class, left ventricular ejection fraction, pulmonary pressure and mitral regurgitation. Out of 2,467 patients, 271 (11%) had a NYHA functional class IV at the admission. The latter had higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score (9.2% vs 5.5%; p < 0.001) compared to NYHA ≤ III patients, owing to more comorbidities (prior myocardial infarction, severe long-term kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, left ventricular dysfunction, significant mitral regurgitation, pulmonary hypertension). Device success was similar between the two groups (93.7% vs 94.5%; p = 0.583). At a median follow-up of 15 months (interquartile range 4 to 36 months) a lower freedom from primary end points was observed among NYHA IV versus NYHA ≤ III group (survival from all-cause death: 52% vs 58.4%; p = 0.002; survival from cardiovascular death: 72.5% vs 76.5%; p = 0.091; freedom from re-hospitalization: 81.5% vs 85.4%; p = 0.038). However, after adjustment for baseline imbalance, NYHA IV did not influence the relative risk of long-term primary end points. A 3-month landmark analysis showed that NYHA IV independently predicted 3-month all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio: 1.77; 95% CI [1.10 to 2.83]; p = 0.018 and hazard ratio: 1.64; 95% CI [1.03 to 2.59]; p = 0.036, respectively). Instead, after 3-month follow-up NYHA IV did not affect the risk of primary end points. A significant improvement of the secondary end points was noted in both NYHA IV and NYHA ≤≤ III groups. In conclusion, the presence of NYHA class IV in TAVI candidates was associated to a significant increased risk of mortality within 3 months. Patients with baseline NYHA IV who survived at 3 months had a long-term outcome comparable to that of other subjects. Left ventricular systolic function, pulmonary pressure, and mitral insufficiency significantly improved after TAVI regardless of baseline NYHA class IV.

摘要

我们的目的是研究基线纽约心脏协会(NYHA)IV 类对接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)的大型真实世界人群临床结局的影响。主要终点是全因死亡率、心血管死亡率和再住院率,在最长的可用随访时间内通过 3 个月的里程碑分析进行评估。次要终点是:NYHA 分级、左心室射血分数、肺动脉压和二尖瓣反流的变化。在 2467 名患者中,271 名(11%)入院时 NYHA 功能分级为 IV 级。后者的胸外科医生协会(STS)评分(9.2%对 5.5%;p<0.001)高于 NYHA ≤ III 患者,这是由于合并症更多(既往心肌梗死、严重长期肾脏疾病、心房颤动、左心室功能障碍、严重二尖瓣反流、肺动脉高压)。两组之间的器械成功率相似(93.7%对 94.5%;p=0.583)。在中位随访 15 个月(四分位距 4 至 36 个月)时,与 NYHA ≤ III 组相比,NYHA IV 组的主要终点无事件生存率较低(全因死亡率:52%对 58.4%;p=0.002;心血管死亡率:72.5%对 76.5%;p=0.091;再住院率:81.5%对 85.4%;p=0.038)。然而,在校正基线不平衡后,NYHA IV 并未影响长期主要终点的相对风险。3 个月的里程碑分析表明,NYHA IV 独立预测 3 个月全因和心血管死亡率(风险比:1.77;95%置信区间 [1.10 至 2.83];p=0.018 和风险比:1.64;95%置信区间 [1.03 至 2.59];p=0.036)。相反,在 3 个月的随访后,NYHA IV 并不影响主要终点的风险。两组的次要终点均显著改善。总之,TAVI 候选者存在 NYHA 分级 IV 与 3 个月内死亡率显著增加相关。在 3 个月时存活的基线 NYHA IV 患者的长期预后与其他患者相当。无论基线 NYHA 分级 IV 如何,左心室收缩功能、肺动脉压和二尖瓣关闭不全均显著改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验