Catheterization Laboratory, Cardiothoracic Department, Spedali Civili Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Catheterization Laboratory, Cardiothoracic Department, Spedali Civili Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Nov 15;122(10):1718-1726. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
Our aim was to investigate the impact of a baseline New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV on clinical outcomes of a large real-world population who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The primary end points were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and re-hospitalization, evaluated at the longest available follow-up and by means of a 3-month landmark analysis. The secondary end points were: change in NYHA class, left ventricular ejection fraction, pulmonary pressure and mitral regurgitation. Out of 2,467 patients, 271 (11%) had a NYHA functional class IV at the admission. The latter had higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score (9.2% vs 5.5%; p < 0.001) compared to NYHA ≤ III patients, owing to more comorbidities (prior myocardial infarction, severe long-term kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, left ventricular dysfunction, significant mitral regurgitation, pulmonary hypertension). Device success was similar between the two groups (93.7% vs 94.5%; p = 0.583). At a median follow-up of 15 months (interquartile range 4 to 36 months) a lower freedom from primary end points was observed among NYHA IV versus NYHA ≤ III group (survival from all-cause death: 52% vs 58.4%; p = 0.002; survival from cardiovascular death: 72.5% vs 76.5%; p = 0.091; freedom from re-hospitalization: 81.5% vs 85.4%; p = 0.038). However, after adjustment for baseline imbalance, NYHA IV did not influence the relative risk of long-term primary end points. A 3-month landmark analysis showed that NYHA IV independently predicted 3-month all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio: 1.77; 95% CI [1.10 to 2.83]; p = 0.018 and hazard ratio: 1.64; 95% CI [1.03 to 2.59]; p = 0.036, respectively). Instead, after 3-month follow-up NYHA IV did not affect the risk of primary end points. A significant improvement of the secondary end points was noted in both NYHA IV and NYHA ≤≤ III groups. In conclusion, the presence of NYHA class IV in TAVI candidates was associated to a significant increased risk of mortality within 3 months. Patients with baseline NYHA IV who survived at 3 months had a long-term outcome comparable to that of other subjects. Left ventricular systolic function, pulmonary pressure, and mitral insufficiency significantly improved after TAVI regardless of baseline NYHA class IV.
我们的目的是研究基线纽约心脏协会(NYHA)IV 类对接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)的大型真实世界人群临床结局的影响。主要终点是全因死亡率、心血管死亡率和再住院率,在最长的可用随访时间内通过 3 个月的里程碑分析进行评估。次要终点是:NYHA 分级、左心室射血分数、肺动脉压和二尖瓣反流的变化。在 2467 名患者中,271 名(11%)入院时 NYHA 功能分级为 IV 级。后者的胸外科医生协会(STS)评分(9.2%对 5.5%;p<0.001)高于 NYHA ≤ III 患者,这是由于合并症更多(既往心肌梗死、严重长期肾脏疾病、心房颤动、左心室功能障碍、严重二尖瓣反流、肺动脉高压)。两组之间的器械成功率相似(93.7%对 94.5%;p=0.583)。在中位随访 15 个月(四分位距 4 至 36 个月)时,与 NYHA ≤ III 组相比,NYHA IV 组的主要终点无事件生存率较低(全因死亡率:52%对 58.4%;p=0.002;心血管死亡率:72.5%对 76.5%;p=0.091;再住院率:81.5%对 85.4%;p=0.038)。然而,在校正基线不平衡后,NYHA IV 并未影响长期主要终点的相对风险。3 个月的里程碑分析表明,NYHA IV 独立预测 3 个月全因和心血管死亡率(风险比:1.77;95%置信区间 [1.10 至 2.83];p=0.018 和风险比:1.64;95%置信区间 [1.03 至 2.59];p=0.036)。相反,在 3 个月的随访后,NYHA IV 并不影响主要终点的风险。两组的次要终点均显著改善。总之,TAVI 候选者存在 NYHA 分级 IV 与 3 个月内死亡率显著增加相关。在 3 个月时存活的基线 NYHA IV 患者的长期预后与其他患者相当。无论基线 NYHA 分级 IV 如何,左心室收缩功能、肺动脉压和二尖瓣关闭不全均显著改善。