• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

10 年回顾性分析西澳大利亚州 3 所三级医院使用生物改善病情抗风湿药物治疗类风湿关节炎患者严重感染的发生率。

Ten-year retrospective review of the incidence of serious infections in patients on biologic disease modifying agents for rheumatoid arthritis in three tertiary hospitals in Western Australia.

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Intern Med J. 2019 Apr;49(4):519-525. doi: 10.1111/imj.14109.

DOI:10.1111/imj.14109
PMID:30230146
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) have significantly improved the prognosis for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, due to their immunosuppressive nature, concerns remain about the potential for infection in patients receiving these medications.

AIMS

To evaluate the incidence of serious infections (SI) in a Western Australian cohort of patients with RA who are receiving bDMARDs. The role of confounders including age, gender, comorbidities and use of glucocorticoids was also evaluated. The incidence of SI was defined as any infection necessitating admission to the hospital and the use of antibiotics.

METHODS

A 10-year retrospective review was conducted of all patients with RA who were receiving bDMARDs at three tertiary hospitals in Western Australia. Discharge summaries and all available clinic letters were reviewed and patient demographics and clinical data were collected. Pearson Chi-squared test and Student's t-test were used for comparing demographic factors and clinical variables between the groups with SI and those without.

RESULTS

One hundred and two patients met the inclusion criteria for the period 2006-2016, 25 of whom had been admitted with SI, accounting for a total of 46 admissions. Skin and soft tissue infections were the most common (28%) followed by respiratory infections (26%) and urinary tract infections (20%). The incidence rate of SI was 8.98 per 100 person years. The rate was lowest with adalimumab (5.27 per 100 person years) and highest with infliximab (34.5 per 100 person years). Those with SI were older (68 years vs 60 years; P = 0.02) and had been on bDMARDs for longer period of time (6.05 years vs 4.68 years; P = 0.04). There was no significant increase in length of stay due to co-administration of glucocorticoids. The presence of comorbidities did not play a significant role in increasing the risk of SI.

CONCLUSION

Age and duration of bDMARD use were statistically significant factors associated with an increased risk of SI. Comorbidities did not play a significant role in increasing the incidence of SI. Patients who were on both glucocorticoids and bDMARDs did not have a significant increase in length of stay when compared with patients who were just on bDMARDs. More research is needed in this area with larger numbers to draw statistically significant conclusions regarding the role of comorbidities in SI risk and the individual infection risk associated with each bDMARD.

摘要

背景

生物制剂类改善病情抗风湿药物(bDMARDs)显著改善了类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的预后。然而,由于其免疫抑制特性,人们仍然担心接受这些药物治疗的患者会发生感染。

目的

评估在接受 bDMARDs 的西澳大利亚 RA 患者队列中严重感染(SI)的发生率。还评估了年龄、性别、合并症和糖皮质激素使用等混杂因素的作用。SI 的发生率定义为需要住院和使用抗生素的任何感染。

方法

对西澳大利亚三家三级医院接受 bDMARDs 的所有 RA 患者进行了为期 10 年的回顾性研究。审查了出院小结和所有可用的门诊信件,并收集了患者的人口统计学和临床数据。使用 Pearson Chi-squared 检验和 Student's t 检验比较了有 SI 组和无 SI 组的人口统计学因素和临床变量。

结果

在 2006 年至 2016 年期间,共有 102 名患者符合纳入标准,其中 25 名患者因 SI 住院,共 46 人次。皮肤和软组织感染最常见(28%),其次是呼吸道感染(26%)和尿路感染(20%)。SI 的发病率为每 100 人年 8.98 例。阿达木单抗(5.27 例/100 人年)的发生率最低,英夫利昔单抗(34.5 例/100 人年)的发生率最高。有 SI 的患者年龄较大(68 岁 vs 60 岁;P = 0.02),接受 bDMARDs 的时间也较长(6.05 年 vs 4.68 年;P = 0.04)。糖皮质激素联合使用并未显著延长住院时间。合并症的存在并没有显著增加 SI 的风险。

结论

年龄和 bDMARD 使用时间是与 SI 风险增加相关的统计学显著因素。合并症在增加 SI 的发生率方面没有起重要作用。与仅接受 bDMARDs 的患者相比,同时接受糖皮质激素和 bDMARDs 的患者的住院时间没有显著增加。需要在这一领域进行更多的研究,以获得关于合并症在 SI 风险中的作用以及与每种 bDMARD 相关的个体感染风险的统计学显著结论。

相似文献

1
Ten-year retrospective review of the incidence of serious infections in patients on biologic disease modifying agents for rheumatoid arthritis in three tertiary hospitals in Western Australia.10 年回顾性分析西澳大利亚州 3 所三级医院使用生物改善病情抗风湿药物治疗类风湿关节炎患者严重感染的发生率。
Intern Med J. 2019 Apr;49(4):519-525. doi: 10.1111/imj.14109.
2
Comparative effectiveness of first-line biological monotherapy use in rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective analysis of the RECord-linkage On Rheumatic Diseases study on health care administrative databases.类风湿关节炎一线生物单药治疗的比较疗效:基于医疗保健管理数据库的风湿性疾病记录链接研究的回顾性分析
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 11;8(9):e021447. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021447.
3
Severe infections in Portuguese patients with rheumatoid arthritis under biologic treatment - a multicenter, nationwide study (SIPPRA-B Study).葡萄牙生物治疗下类风湿关节炎患者的严重感染:一项多中心、全国性研究(SIPPRA-B 研究)。
ARP Rheumatol. 2023 Apr-Jun;2(2):111-119.
4
Changing rate of serious infections in biologic-exposed rheumatoid arthritis patients. Data from South American registries BIOBADABRASIL and BIOBADASAR.生物制剂暴露的类风湿关节炎患者严重感染发生率的变化。来自南美洲登记处 BIOBADABRASIL 和 BIOBADASAR 的数据。
Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Aug;38(8):2129-2139. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04516-2. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
5
Long-term use of biologic agents does not increase the risk of serious infections in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis.长期使用生物制剂不会增加老年类风湿关节炎患者发生严重感染的风险。
Rheumatol Int. 2017 Mar;37(3):369-376. doi: 10.1007/s00296-016-3631-z. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
6
Incidence of infection other than tuberculosis in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases treated with bDMARDs: a real-time clinical experience from India.自身免疫性风湿病患者接受生物 DMARDs 治疗后的结核以外感染发生率:来自印度的实时临床经验。
Rheumatol Int. 2019 Mar;39(3):497-507. doi: 10.1007/s00296-019-04245-4. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
7
Adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, certolizumab pegol, golimumab, tocilizumab and abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis not previously treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and after the failure of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs only: systematic review and economic evaluation.阿达木单抗、依那西普、英夫利昔单抗、聚乙二醇化赛妥珠单抗、戈利木单抗、托珠单抗和阿巴西普用于治疗既往未使用改善病情抗风湿药物治疗且仅在传统改善病情抗风湿药物治疗失败后的类风湿关节炎:系统评价和经济学评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Apr;20(35):1-610. doi: 10.3310/hta20350.
8
A retrospective review of the persistence on bDMARDs prescribed for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in the Australian population.对澳大利亚人群中用于治疗类风湿关节炎的生物改善病情抗风湿药(bDMARDs)持续使用情况的回顾性研究。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2018 Aug;21(8):1581-1590. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13243. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
9
Comparisons between comorbid conditions and health care consumption in rheumatoid arthritis patients with or without biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: a register-based study.类风湿关节炎患者使用或未使用生物性改善病情抗风湿药物时合并症与医疗保健消费的比较:一项基于登记的研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Dec 12;17(1):499. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1354-7.
10
Safety of abatacept compared with other biologic and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: data from an observational study.与其他生物制剂和常规合成疾病修饰抗风湿药物相比,阿巴西普在类风湿关节炎患者中的安全性:来自观察性研究的数据。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Jun 7;21(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1921-z.

引用本文的文献

1
The pattern of anti-IL-6 versus non-anti-IL-6 biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Wales, UK: a real-world study using electronic health records.英国威尔士类风湿关节炎患者中抗白细胞介素-6与非抗白细胞介素-6生物改善病情抗风湿药物的使用模式:一项利用电子健康记录的真实世界研究
Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2024 Dec 14;9(1):rkae140. doi: 10.1093/rap/rkae140. eCollection 2025.
2
Risk of Severe Infection among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients on Biological DMARDs: A Population-Based Cohort Study.使用生物性改善病情抗风湿药的类风湿关节炎患者发生严重感染的风险:一项基于人群的队列研究
J Clin Med. 2022 May 24;11(11):2955. doi: 10.3390/jcm11112955.
3
The Key Comorbidities in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Narrative Review.
类风湿关节炎患者的关键合并症:一项叙述性综述。
J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 1;10(3):509. doi: 10.3390/jcm10030509.
4
Prediction of infection risk in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with biologics: are we any closer to risk stratification?生物制剂治疗类风湿关节炎患者感染风险预测:我们离风险分层更近了吗?
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2019 May;31(3):285-292. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000598.