Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Liver Transpl. 2019 Jan;25(1):119-127. doi: 10.1002/lt.25340.
The increased use of split-liver transplantation (SLT) represents a strategy to increase the supply of organs. Although outcomes after SLT and whole liver transplantation (WLT) are similar on average among pediatric recipients, we hypothesized that the relationship between graft type and outcomes may vary depending on patient, donor, and surgical characteristics. We evaluated graft survival among pediatric (<18 years) deceased donor, liver-only transplant recipients from March 2002 until December 2015 using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Graft survival was assessed in a Cox proportional hazards model, with and without effect modification between graft type and donor, recipient, and surgical characteristics, to identify conditions where the risk of graft loss for SLT and WLT were similar. In a traditional multivariable model, characteristics associated with graft loss included donor age >50 years, recipient weight <10 kg, acute hepatic necrosis, autoimmune diseases, tumor, public insurance, and cold ischemia time (CIT) >8 hours. In an analysis that explored whether these characteristics modified the relationship between graft type and graft loss, many characteristics associated with loss actually had similar outcomes regardless of graft type, including weight <10 kg, acute hepatic necrosis, autoimmune diseases, and tumor. In contrast, several subgroups had worse outcomes when SLT was used, including recipient weight 10-35 kg, non-biliary atresia cholestasis, and metabolic disease. Allocation score, share type, or CIT did not modify risk of graft type and graft failure. Although one might anticipate that individuals with higher rates of graft loss would be worse candidates for SLT, data suggest that these patients actually have similar rates of graft loss. These findings can guide surgical decision making and may support policy changes that promote the increased use of SLT for specific pediatric recipients.
劈离式肝移植(SLT)的应用增加代表了一种增加器官供应的策略。虽然 SLT 和全肝移植(WLT)在儿科受者中的总体结果相似,但我们假设供体、受者和手术特征的不同可能会影响移植物类型与结果之间的关系。我们使用移植受者登记处(SRTR)的数据,评估了 2002 年 3 月至 2015 年 12 月期间,来自已故供体的、仅接受肝脏移植的儿科(<18 岁)受者的移植物存活率。在 Cox 比例风险模型中评估了移植物存活率,模型中考虑了移植物类型与供体、受者和手术特征之间的相互作用修饰,以确定 SLT 和 WLT 的失效率相似的条件。在传统的多变量模型中,与移植物丢失相关的特征包括供体年龄>50 岁、受者体重<10kg、急性肝坏死、自身免疫性疾病、肿瘤、公共保险和冷缺血时间(CIT)>8 小时。在一项探索这些特征是否修饰移植物类型与移植物丢失之间关系的分析中,许多与丢失相关的特征实际上无论移植物类型如何,结局都相似,包括体重<10kg、急性肝坏死、自身免疫性疾病和肿瘤。相比之下,当使用 SLT 时,有几个亚组的结局更差,包括受者体重 10-35kg、非胆道闭锁性胆汁淤积和代谢性疾病。分配评分、共享类型或 CIT 均未改变移植物类型和移植物失败的风险。尽管人们可能预期移植物丢失率较高的个体不适合进行 SLT,但数据表明这些患者实际上具有相似的移植物丢失率。这些发现可以指导手术决策,并可能支持促进特定儿科受者 SLT 应用增加的政策变化。