Burris Howard A, Saltz Leonard B, Yu Peter P
From Sarah Cannon, Nashville, TN; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, CT, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018 May 23;38:139-146. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_200825.
Next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based technology has lowered the cost of cancer testing for genomic alterations and is now commercially available from a growing number of diagnostic laboratories. However, laboratories vary in the methodologies underlying their tests, the types and numbers of genomic alterations covered by the test, and the clinical annotation of the sequencing findings. Determining the value of NGS tests is dependent on whether it is used to support clinical trials or as a part of routine clinical care at a time when both the investigational drug pipeline and the list of U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved or Compendium-listed therapeutics is in a high state of flux. Reimbursement policy for NGS testing by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid is evolving as the value of NGS testing becomes more clearly defined for specific clinical situations. Patient care and clinical decisions-making are dependent on the oncologist's knowledge of when NGS testing has value. Here, we review principles and practice for NGS testing in this dynamic confluence of technology, cancer biology, and health care policy.
基于新一代测序(NGS)的技术降低了癌症基因组改变检测的成本,目前越来越多的诊断实验室都可提供商业化检测。然而,各实验室在检测所依据的方法、检测涵盖的基因组改变的类型和数量,以及测序结果的临床注释方面存在差异。在研究性药物研发流程以及美国食品药品监督管理局批准或《美国药典》列出的治疗药物清单都处于高度变化的时期,确定NGS检测的价值取决于它是用于支持临床试验还是作为常规临床护理的一部分。随着NGS检测在特定临床情况下的价值变得更加明确,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心对NGS检测的报销政策也在不断演变。患者护理和临床决策取决于肿瘤学家对NGS检测何时具有价值的了解。在此,我们回顾在技术、癌症生物学和医疗保健政策这一动态交汇点上进行NGS检测的原则和实践。