• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Promoting guideline-based cancer genetic risk assessment for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in ethnically and geographically diverse cancer survivors: Rationale and design of a 3-arm randomized controlled trial.促进基于指南的遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌癌症遗传风险评估在不同种族和地理分布的癌症幸存者中的应用:一项三臂随机对照试验的原理和设计。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Oct;73:123-135. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
2
Identifying Mediators of Intervention Effects Within a Randomized Controlled Trial to Motivate Cancer Genetic Risk Assessment Among Breast and Ovarian Cancer Survivors.在一项随机对照试验中识别干预效果的中介因素,以激励乳腺癌和卵巢癌幸存者进行癌症遗传风险评估。
Ann Behav Med. 2023 Oct 16;57(11):965-977. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaad048.
3
Understanding cancer genetic risk assessment motivations in a remote tailored risk communication and navigation intervention randomized controlled trial.在一项远程定制风险沟通与导航干预随机对照试验中理解癌症遗传风险评估的动机。
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2022 Dec 9;10(1):1190-1215. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2022.2150623. eCollection 2022.
4
Improving Uptake of Cancer Genetic Risk Assessment in a Remote Tailored Risk Communication and Navigation Intervention: Large Effect Size but Room to Grow.提高偏远地区癌症遗传风险评估的接受度:定制风险沟通和导航干预的大效应量,但仍有增长空间。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 May 20;41(15):2767-2778. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00751. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
5
Randomized trial promoting cancer genetic risk assessment when genetic counseling cost removed: 1-year follow-up.随机试验在去除遗传咨询费用后促进癌症遗传风险评估:1 年随访。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024 Feb 29;8(2). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkae018.
6
Patient and Clinician Decision Support to Increase Genetic Counseling for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.患者和临床医生决策支持以增加初级保健中遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌综合征的遗传咨询:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2222092. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22092.
7
Racial disparities in BRCA testing and cancer risk management across a population-based sample of young breast cancer survivors.基于人群的年轻乳腺癌幸存者样本中BRCA检测与癌症风险管理的种族差异。
Cancer. 2017 Jul 1;123(13):2497-2505. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30621. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
8
Cultural adaptations to a telephone genetic counseling protocol and booklet for Latina breast cancer survivors at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.文化适应的电话遗传咨询协议和手册,为有遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌风险的拉丁裔乳腺癌幸存者。
Transl Behav Med. 2023 May 13;13(5):297-308. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac106.
9
Increasing referral of at-risk women for genetic counseling and BRCA testing using a screening tool in a community breast imaging center.在社区乳腺影像中心使用筛查工具增加有风险的女性接受遗传咨询和 BRCA 检测的转介率。
Cancer. 2022 Jan 1;128(1):94-102. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33866. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
10
Interdisciplinary risk counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: real-world data from a specialized center.遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌的跨学科风险咨询:来自专门中心的真实世界数据。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 May;307(5):1585-1592. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06819-3. Epub 2022 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving genetics equity: identifying women eligible for genetic care services using mammography clinics in underserved areas as screening hubs.改善基因公平性:利用服务欠缺地区的乳腺钼靶检查诊所作为筛查中心,确定符合基因护理服务条件的女性。
Oncologist. 2025 Jul 4;30(7). doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf113.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of Remote Tailored Risk Communication and Navigation for Hereditary Genetic Risk Assessment Uptake: Economic Evaluation From the Genetic Risk Assessment for Cancer Education and Empowerment Trial.远程定制风险沟通与导航以促进遗传性基因风险评估接受度的成本效益:来自癌症教育与赋权基因风险评估试验的经济评估
JCO Oncol Pract. 2025 Jun;21(6):824-831. doi: 10.1200/OP-24-00617. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
3
A ten-year overview of cancer genetic family history screening in Georgia's Latina population.乔治亚州拉丁裔人群中癌症遗传家族史筛查的十年综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 2;12:1432971. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1432971. eCollection 2024.
4
Randomized trial promoting cancer genetic risk assessment when genetic counseling cost removed: 1-year follow-up.随机试验在去除遗传咨询费用后促进癌症遗传风险评估:1 年随访。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024 Feb 29;8(2). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkae018.
5
Identifying Mediators of Intervention Effects Within a Randomized Controlled Trial to Motivate Cancer Genetic Risk Assessment Among Breast and Ovarian Cancer Survivors.在一项随机对照试验中识别干预效果的中介因素,以激励乳腺癌和卵巢癌幸存者进行癌症遗传风险评估。
Ann Behav Med. 2023 Oct 16;57(11):965-977. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaad048.
6
A practical method for integrating community priorities in planning and implementing cancer control programs.一种将社区优先事项纳入癌症控制规划和实施的实用方法。
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Dec;34(Suppl 1):113-123. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01688-w. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
7
Improving Uptake of Cancer Genetic Risk Assessment in a Remote Tailored Risk Communication and Navigation Intervention: Large Effect Size but Room to Grow.提高偏远地区癌症遗传风险评估的接受度:定制风险沟通和导航干预的大效应量,但仍有增长空间。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 May 20;41(15):2767-2778. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00751. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
8
Understanding cancer genetic risk assessment motivations in a remote tailored risk communication and navigation intervention randomized controlled trial.在一项远程定制风险沟通与导航干预随机对照试验中理解癌症遗传风险评估的动机。
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2022 Dec 9;10(1):1190-1215. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2022.2150623. eCollection 2022.
9
Disparities in cancer genetics care by race/ethnicity among pan-cancer patients with pathogenic germline variants.泛癌种携带致病变异体种系变异患者的种族/民族差异与癌症遗传学护理。
Cancer. 2022 Nov 1;128(21):3870-3879. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34434. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
10
Motivational interviewing for genetic counseling: A unified framework for persuasive and equipoise conversations.动机性访谈在遗传咨询中的应用:一种用于有说服力和平衡对话的统一框架。
J Genet Couns. 2022 Oct;31(5):1020-1031. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1609. Epub 2022 Jul 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Gaps in Receipt of Clinically Indicated Genetic Counseling After Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.乳腺癌诊断后临床指征遗传咨询的接受情况存在差距。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr 20;36(12):1218-1224. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.2369. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
2
National Estimates of Genetic Testing in Women With a History of Breast or Ovarian Cancer.有乳腺癌或卵巢癌病史女性的基因检测全国估计数。
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;35(34):3800-3806. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.73.6314. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
3
Immunotherapy holds the key to cancer treatment and prevention in constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD) syndrome.免疫疗法是先天性错配修复缺陷(CMMRD)综合征癌症治疗和预防的关键。
Cancer Lett. 2017 Sep 10;403:159-164. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
4
Olaparib for Metastatic Breast Cancer in Patients with a Germline BRCA Mutation.奥拉帕利治疗携种系 BRCA 突变的转移性乳腺癌患者。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 10;377(6):523-533. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1706450. Epub 2017 Jun 4.
5
Gaps in Incorporating Germline Genetic Testing Into Treatment Decision-Making for Early-Stage Breast Cancer.将生殖系基因检测纳入早期乳腺癌治疗决策过程中的差距。
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 10;35(20):2232-2239. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.6480. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
6
Intervention Mediators in a Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Colonoscopy Uptake Among Individuals at Increased Risk of Familial Colorectal Cancer.一项旨在提高家族性结直肠癌风险增加个体结肠镜检查接受率的随机对照试验中的干预介导因素。
Ann Behav Med. 2017 Oct;51(5):694-706. doi: 10.1007/s12160-017-9893-1.
7
Racial disparities in BRCA testing and cancer risk management across a population-based sample of young breast cancer survivors.基于人群的年轻乳腺癌幸存者样本中BRCA检测与癌症风险管理的种族差异。
Cancer. 2017 Jul 1;123(13):2497-2505. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30621. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
8
Genetic Testing and Counseling Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer .新诊断乳腺癌患者的基因检测与咨询
JAMA. 2017 Feb 7;317(5):531-534. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.16918.
9
Evolution of Hereditary Breast Cancer Genetic Services: Are Changes Reflected in the Knowledge and Clinical Practices of Florida Providers?遗传性乳腺癌基因检测服务的演变:佛罗里达州医疗服务提供者的知识和临床实践中是否体现了这些变化?
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2016 Oct;20(10):569-578. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2016.0113. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
10
Multilevel Intervention Raises Latina Participation in Mammography Screening: Findings from ¡Fortaleza Latina!多级干预提高了拉丁裔女性参与乳房X光检查筛查的比例:来自“拉丁力量!”的研究结果
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Apr;25(4):584-92. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-1246.

促进基于指南的遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌癌症遗传风险评估在不同种族和地理分布的癌症幸存者中的应用:一项三臂随机对照试验的原理和设计。

Promoting guideline-based cancer genetic risk assessment for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in ethnically and geographically diverse cancer survivors: Rationale and design of a 3-arm randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, Jersey; Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, Jersey.

Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, Mexico.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Oct;73:123-135. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Sep 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2018.09.005
PMID:30236776
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6214814/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although national guidelines for cancer genetic risk assessment (CGRA) for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) have been available for over two decades, less than half of high-risk women have accessed these services, especially underserved minority and rural populations. Identification of high-risk individuals is crucial for cancer survivors and their families to benefit from biomedical advances in cancer prevention, early detection, and treatment.

METHODS

This paper describes community-engaged formative research and the protocol of the ongoing randomized 3-arm controlled Genetic Risk Assessment for Cancer Education and Empowerment (GRACE) trial. Ethnically and geographically diverse breast and ovarian cancer survivors at increased risk for hereditary cancer predisposition who have not had a CGRA are recruited through the three statewide cancer registries. The specific aims are to: 1) compare the effectiveness of a targeted intervention (TP) vs. a tailored counseling and navigation(TCN) intervention vs. usual care (UC) on CGRA utilization at 6 months post-diagnosis (primary outcome); compare the effectiveness of the interventions on genetic counseling uptake at 12 months after removal of cost barriers (secondary outcome); 2) examine potential underlying theoretical mediating and moderating mechanisms; and 3) conduct a cost evaluation to guide dissemination strategies.

DISCUSSION

The ongoing GRACE trial addresses an important translational gap by developing and implementing evidence-based strategies to promote guideline-based care and reduce disparities in CGRA utilization among ethnically and geographically diverse women. If effective, these interventions have the potential to reach a large number of high-risk families and reduce disparities through broad dissemination.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03326713; clinicaltrials.gov.

摘要

背景

尽管癌症遗传风险评估(CGRA)的国家指南已经存在了二十多年,但只有不到一半的高风险女性接受了这些服务,尤其是服务不足的少数族裔和农村地区的女性。确定高风险个体对于癌症幸存者及其家庭从癌症预防、早期发现和治疗的生物医学进展中获益至关重要。

方法

本文描述了社区参与的形成性研究和正在进行的随机 3 臂对照遗传风险评估以进行癌症教育和赋权(GRACE)试验的方案。通过三个全州癌症登记处招募了患有遗传性癌症易感性增加的乳腺癌和卵巢癌幸存者,这些幸存者尚未进行 CGRA。具体目标是:1)比较靶向干预(TP)与量身定制的咨询和导航(TCN)干预与常规护理(UC)在诊断后 6 个月 CGRA 利用率方面的有效性(主要结局);比较干预措施在消除成本障碍后 12 个月内对遗传咨询参与的有效性(次要结局);2)检查潜在的潜在理论中介和调节机制;并 3)进行成本评估以指导传播策略。

讨论

正在进行的 GRACE 试验通过制定和实施循证策略来解决重要的转化差距,以促进基于指南的护理并减少不同种族和地理背景的女性在 CGRA 利用方面的差异。如果有效,这些干预措施有可能通过广泛传播来接触到大量高危家庭并减少差异。

登记号

NCT03326713;clinicaltrials.gov。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b14/6214814/f0821287388e/nihms-1507841-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b14/6214814/ce8706791889/nihms-1507841-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b14/6214814/24f614c275fe/nihms-1507841-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b14/6214814/f0821287388e/nihms-1507841-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b14/6214814/ce8706791889/nihms-1507841-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b14/6214814/24f614c275fe/nihms-1507841-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b14/6214814/f0821287388e/nihms-1507841-f0003.jpg