Department of Microbiology and Immunology, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2019 Jan;33(1):48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
In this review, we describe the indications, surgical aspects, benefits and risks of nephrectomy after graft failure. There is a great variation in the number of allograft nephrectomies performed among different centers. Nephrectomy of a failed allograft is associated with significant morbidity and mortality with a complication rate of 20-30% and mortality rates between 0% and 11%. A systematic review through Medline (Pubmed) and Embase identified thirteen retrospective studies that compared patients with and patients without allograft nephrectomy prior to retransplantation. Allograft nephrectomy associates with an increased risk of HLA antibody development. With two recent studies that used the more sensitive HLA antibody detection methods disproving the hypothesis of intragraft adsorption of HLA antibodies, the mechanism leading to the increased HLA antibody levels is not clear, but the role of immunosuppression withdrawal is becoming clear and needs further investigation. In nine of the thirteen studies that evaluated the impact of allograft nephrectomy on outcome in retransplantation, retransplant graft survival was not significantly different among patients with and patients without allograft nephrectomy. Only three studies showed significantly worse retransplant graft survival if prior allograft nephrectomy was performed. Most studies did not observe a significant difference in patient survival after retransplantation with versus without prior allograft nephrectomy. All studies were affected by the retrospective design, indication bias, and selection bias. On the basis of the available literature on this topic, we did not identify a clear advantage or disadvantage of allograft nephrectomy, in terms of outcome after repeat transplantation. Nevertheless, the significantly increased risk of HLA antibody sensitization, especially in patients at high immunological risk like high donor-recipientHLA epitope mismatch load and HLA-DQB1 mismatches, argues against routine allograft nephrectomy and immunosuppression withdrawal in asymptomatic patients who are eligible for repeat transplantation.
在这篇综述中,我们描述了移植肾失功后肾切除术的适应证、手术方面、益处和风险。不同中心行同种异体肾切除术的数量差异很大。失功的同种异体肾切除术与显著的发病率和死亡率相关,并发症发生率为 20-30%,死亡率在 0%至 11%之间。通过 Medline(Pubmed)和 Embase 进行系统回顾,确定了 13 项比较同种异体肾切除术前和术后再次移植患者的回顾性研究。同种异体肾切除术与 HLA 抗体产生的风险增加相关。最近的两项研究使用更敏感的 HLA 抗体检测方法证明了移植物内 HLA 抗体吸附的假设是错误的,导致 HLA 抗体水平升高的机制尚不清楚,但免疫抑制剂停药的作用越来越明显,需要进一步研究。在评估同种异体肾切除术对再次移植结局影响的 13 项研究中,有 9 项研究表明,同种异体肾切除术前和术后患者的再移植移植物存活率无显著差异。只有 3 项研究表明,如果先前进行了同种异体肾切除术,再移植移植物存活率显著降低。大多数研究在再次移植后患者存活率方面未观察到有无先前同种异体肾切除术的显著差异。所有研究都受到回顾性设计、适应证偏倚和选择偏倚的影响。基于这一主题的现有文献,我们没有发现同种异体肾切除术在重复移植后的结果方面有明显的优势或劣势。然而,HLA 抗体致敏的风险显著增加,尤其是在高免疫风险的患者中,如高供受者 HLA 表位匹配负荷和 HLA-DQB1 错配,这反对在有资格重复移植的无症状患者中常规进行同种异体肾切除术和免疫抑制剂停药。