Suppr超能文献

雾化皮质类固醇治疗 COPD 加重:系统评价、荟萃分析和临床视角。

Nebulized Corticosteroids in the Treatment of COPD Exacerbations: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Clinical Perspective.

机构信息

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC Pulmonary Department, and Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Chapel Hill School of Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2018 Oct;63(10):1302-1310. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06384.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

COPD guidelines report that systemic corticosteroids are preferred over inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of exacerbations, but the inhaled route is considered to be an option.

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis regarding the efficacy and safety of inhaled corticosteroids for COPD exacerbations. The second objective was to provide pharmacologic and clinical perspectives of inhaled corticosteroids for COPD exacerbations.

METHODS

The primary outcome was a change in FEV baseline versus the last measured value. Secondary outcomes were a change in (P ) and (P ) baselines versus the last measured values; FEV, P , and P at 24 or 72 h; and hyperglycemia.

RESULTS

Each of the 9 studies included in the meta-analysis was conducted in subjects who were hospitalized and not critically ill. Our meta-analysis indicated that high-dose nebulized budesonide 4-8 mg/d was noninferior to systemic corticosteroids on the change in FEV between baseline and the last measured value (mean difference of 0.05, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.12, = .13) and P (mean difference of -1.14, 95% CI -2.56 to 0.27, = .11) but of inferior efficacy for P changes (mean difference of -1.46, 95% -2.75 to -0.16, = .03). Hyperglycemia was less frequent with high-dose nebulized budesonide (risk ratio, 0.13; 95% CI 0.03-0.46; = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our meta-analysis with a change in FEV as the primary end point, high-dose nebulized budesonide was an acceptable alternative to systemic corticosteroids in hospitalized subjects with COPD exacerbations who were not critically ill. Additional well-designed prospective studies are needed in both the acute care and ambulatory settings. We provide perspective on how this evidence might be applied in clinical practice.

摘要

背景

COPD 指南报告称,在治疗加重期时,全身性皮质类固醇优于吸入皮质类固醇,但吸入途径被认为是一种选择。

目的

对吸入皮质类固醇治疗 COPD 加重的疗效和安全性进行系统评价和荟萃分析。第二个目标是提供吸入皮质类固醇治疗 COPD 加重的药理学和临床观点。

方法

主要结局是 FEV 基线与最后一次测量值的变化。次要结局是(P )和(P )基线与最后一次测量值的变化;FEV、P 、P 在 24 或 72 小时;以及高血糖。

结果

荟萃分析中纳入的 9 项研究均在住院但未危重症的患者中进行。我们的荟萃分析表明,高剂量雾化布地奈德 4-8mg/d 在 FEV 变化方面不劣于全身皮质类固醇,即与基线和最后一次测量值之间的差异(平均差异 0.05,95%CI-0.01 至 0.12, =.13)和 P (平均差异-1.14,95%CI-2.56 至 0.27, =.11),但在 P 变化方面疗效较差(平均差异-1.46,95%CI-2.75 至-0.16, =.03)。高剂量雾化布地奈德发生高血糖的频率较低(风险比,0.13;95%CI 0.03-0.46; =.002)。

结论

根据我们以 FEV 变化为主要终点的荟萃分析,在不危及生命的住院 COPD 加重患者中,高剂量雾化布地奈德是全身皮质类固醇的一种可接受的替代方案。在急性护理和门诊环境中还需要进行更多精心设计的前瞻性研究。我们提供了如何将这一证据应用于临床实践的观点。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验