Kowalik Krzysztof, Węgierska Małgorzata, Barczyńska Tacjana, Jeka Sławomir
Non-public Health Care Centre "Nasz Lekarz" Krzysztof Kowalik, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Diseases Clinic of dr Jan Biziel University Hospital No. 2 in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Reumatologia. 2018;56(4):212-218. doi: 10.5114/reum.2018.77972. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
Modern treatment of autoimmune diseases is becoming increasingly widely used. We owe it to the continuous and rapid development of biotechnology, molecular biology, immunology, and biochemistry. The proven effectiveness of biological therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) should result in its widespread use. At present, only about 1% of patients with RA have access to biological therapy in Poland.
The study material was retrospectively collected in the Rheumatology and Systemic Tissue Diseases Clinic and Rheumatology Outpatient Clinic in dr Jan Biziel University Hospital No. 2 in Bydgoszcz 2009-2014. Patients were divided into 3 groups: patient receiving infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab.
The study involved analyses of cost effectiveness. The time horizon of patient documentation analysis ranged from the time a patient was enrolled to infliximab, etanercept or adalimumab therapy until remission of the disease. The majority of patients achieved remission in the case of adalimumab treatment (85.29%), followed by etanercept (74.07%), then infliximab (37.21%). Taking into account the DAS28 parameter, analysis was performed using medical costs of the analyzed treatment regimens. For this purpose, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated. According to the analysis, obtaining one DAS28 unit, replacing infliximab with etanercept, would cost PLN 40 964 67. Higher costs would be required in the case of replacement of infliximab with adalimumab - PLN 43 076 08. Obtaining one additional DAS28 unit (in this case, a decrease in DAS28 by one unit) by introducing adalimumab instead of etanercept would amount to PLN 45 409 74.
Undoubtedly, the pharmacoeconomic analysis makes it easier to decide on the appropriate treatment. Therefore, its implementation should be a widely used solution not only for RA, but also for other diseases. Health care and other entities' systems should also be improved in such a way that the data needed for pharmacoeconomic analysis are fully available.
自身免疫性疾病的现代治疗方法应用越来越广泛。这得益于生物技术、分子生物学、免疫学和生物化学的持续快速发展。生物疗法在类风湿关节炎(RA)中的疗效已得到证实,理应得到广泛应用。目前在波兰,仅有约1%的RA患者能够接受生物疗法。
研究材料于2009 - 2014年在比得哥什市扬·比齐埃尔第二大学医院的风湿病与系统性组织疾病诊所及风湿病门诊进行回顾性收集。患者被分为3组:接受英夫利昔单抗、依那西普和阿达木单抗治疗的患者。
该研究涉及成本效益分析。患者病历分析的时间范围从患者开始接受英夫利昔单抗、依那西普或阿达木单抗治疗直至疾病缓解。在阿达木单抗治疗的情况下,大多数患者实现了缓解(85.29%),其次是依那西普(74.07%),然后是英夫利昔单抗(37.21%)。考虑到DAS28参数,使用所分析治疗方案的医疗成本进行分析。为此,计算了增量成本效益比(ICER)。根据分析,用依那西普替代英夫利昔单抗,每获得1个DAS28单位将花费4096467波兰兹罗提。用阿达木单抗替代英夫利昔单抗则需要更高的成本——4307608波兰兹罗提。通过引入阿达木单抗而非依那西普来额外获得1个DAS28单位(在此情况下,DAS28降低1个单位)将达到4540974波兰兹罗提。
毫无疑问,药物经济学分析有助于做出合适的治疗决策。因此,其应用不仅应成为RA,也应成为其他疾病广泛采用的解决方案。医疗保健及其他实体系统也应以能充分获取药物经济学分析所需数据的方式加以改进。