Suppr超能文献

强度分布变化对运动表现及训练负荷量化的影响。

Effects of intensity distribution changes on performance and on training loads quantification.

作者信息

Jean-Christophe Hourcade, Philippe Noirez, Michel Sidney, Jean-François Toussaint, François Desgorces

机构信息

Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.

IRMES, EA7329, INSEP, Paris, France.

出版信息

Biol Sport. 2018 Mar;35(1):67-74. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2018.70753. Epub 2017 Oct 12.

Abstract

The present study analyses the effects of the high-intensity distribution change within sessions on physical performance and on training loads (TL) provided by quantification methods based on heart rate (HR) and on whole body indicators of exercise-induced physiological stress. Fourteen trained physical education students (21.9±1.2 years, 68.3±7.9 kg, 180±7.3 cm) performed two sessions with the same intensities, volumes and pauses but differing in the efforts' intensity distribution: one was composed of exercises dissociating the intensities (12 repetitions of 30 m sprints then 12 min interval runs) and the second mixed the intensities (30 m sprint followed by 60 s rest and 2 runs of 15 s - 15 s at 100% and 50% of maximal aerobic velocity - MAV). Session TL was calculated using methods based on heart rate zones, training impulse, ratings of perceived exertion (session RPE) and endurance limit. Session-induced fatigue was observed using performances in repeated sprints and counter-movement jumps. The heart rate zone method provided higher TL for the mixed session (=0.007), while training impulse described similar TL for the two sessions (=0.420). The endurance limit method showed borderline significantly higher TL in dissociated sessions (=0.058) and session RPE provided similar but the largest differences between sessions' TL (=0.001). The dissociated session induced larger losses in counter-movement jumps (=0.010) but lower speed decreases in sprints (=0.007). Change in intensity distribution within sessions induced contradictory effects on performances and on TL quantification according to the method used. When high intensities are programmed, methods based on heart rate may present limitations for TL quantification, as such methods based on whole body indicators of exercise-induced physiological stress should be preferred.

摘要

本研究分析了训练课中高强度分布变化对身体机能以及基于心率(HR)的量化方法和运动诱发生理应激的全身指标所提供的训练负荷(TL)的影响。14名受过训练的体育专业学生(21.9±1.2岁,68.3±7.9千克,180±7.3厘米)进行了两节强度、运动量和休息时间相同,但用力强度分布不同的训练课:一节由强度分离的练习组成(30米短跑12次,然后进行12分钟间歇跑),另一节混合了强度(30米短跑后休息60秒,进行2次15秒的跑步——分别以最大有氧速度(MAV)的100%和50%进行)。使用基于心率区间、训练冲量、主观用力程度评分(训练课RPE)和耐力极限的方法计算训练课TL。通过重复短跑和反向纵跳的表现来观察训练课诱发的疲劳。心率区间法显示混合训练课的TL更高(=0.007),而训练冲量表明两节训练课的TL相似(=0.420)。耐力极限法显示分离训练课的TL略高(=0.058),训练课RPE显示两节训练课的TL相似但差异最大(=0.001)。分离训练课导致反向纵跳的下降幅度更大(=0.010),但短跑时速度下降幅度较小(=0.007)。训练课中强度分布的变化根据所使用的方法对运动表现和TL量化产生了矛盾的影响。当安排高强度训练时,基于心率的方法在TL量化方面可能存在局限性,因此应优先选择基于运动诱发生理应激的全身指标的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2128/6135970/14697cd67002/JBS-35-70753-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验