成人疼痛测量中反应量表的选择:文献综述结果

Response scale selection in adult pain measures: results from a literature review.

作者信息

Safikhani Shima, Gries Katharine S, Trudeau Jeremiah J, Reasner David, Rüdell Katja, Coons Stephen Joel, Bush Elizabeth Nicole, Hanlon Jennifer, Abraham Lucy, Vernon Margaret

机构信息

1Evidera, 7101 Wisconsin Ave., Suite 1400, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA.

2Janssen Global Services LLC, 700 Route US 202, Raritan, NJ 08869 USA.

出版信息

J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018 Sep 6;2:40. doi: 10.1186/s41687-018-0053-6. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this literature review was to examine the existing patient-reported outcome measurement literature to understand the empirical evidence supporting response scale selection in pain measurement for the adult population.

METHODS

The search strategy involved a comprehensive, structured, literature review with multiple search objectives and search terms.

RESULTS

The searched yielded 6918 abstracts which were reviewed against study criteria for eligibility across the adult pain objective. The review included 42 review articles, consensus guidelines, expert opinion pieces, and primary research articles providing insights into optimal response scale selection for pain assessment in the adult population. Based on the extensive and varied literature on pain assessments, the adult pain studies typically use simple response scales with single-item measures of pain-a numeric rating scale, visual analog scale, or verbal rating scale. Across 42 review articles, consensus guidelines, expert opinion pieces, and primary research articles, the NRS response scale was most often recommended in these guidance documents. When reviewing the empirical basis for these recommendations, we found that the NRS had slightly superior measurement properties (e.g., reliability, validity, responsiveness) across a wide variety of contexts of use as compared to other response scales.

CONCLUSIONS

Both empirical studies and review articles provide evidence that the 11-point NRS is likely the optimal response scale to evaluate pain among adult patients without cognitive impairment.

摘要

背景

本综述的目的是研究现有的患者报告结局测量文献,以了解支持成人疼痛测量中反应量表选择的实证证据。

方法

检索策略包括全面、结构化的文献综述,具有多个检索目标和检索词。

结果

检索得到6918篇摘要,根据成人疼痛目标的纳入标准对其进行了审查。该综述包括42篇综述文章、共识指南、专家意见文章和原始研究文章,这些文章为成人疼痛评估的最佳反应量表选择提供了见解。基于关于疼痛评估的广泛多样的文献,成人疼痛研究通常使用简单的反应量表,采用疼痛的单项测量——数字评定量表、视觉模拟量表或语言评定量表。在42篇综述文章、共识指南、专家意见文章和原始研究文章中,数字评定量表(NRS)反应量表在这些指导文件中最常被推荐。在审查这些建议的实证依据时,我们发现与其他反应量表相比,数字评定量表在各种使用情境下具有略优的测量属性(如信度、效度、反应度)。

结论

实证研究和综述文章均提供证据表明,11点数字评定量表可能是评估无认知障碍成年患者疼痛的最佳反应量表。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efdb/6153257/cbd5738fdf0b/41687_2018_53_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索