• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估犯罪思维过程的主动性和反应性维度:与犯罪风险和未来结果的变量和个体水平测量的相关模式的差异。

Assessing the Proactive and Reactive Dimensions of Criminal Thought Process: Divergent Patterns of Correlation With Variable- and Person-Level Measures of Criminal Risk and Future Outcome.

机构信息

Department of Criminal Justice, Kutztown University.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 2020 Mar-Apr;102(2):223-230. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1508469. Epub 2018 Sep 21.

DOI:10.1080/00223891.2018.1508469
PMID:30239221
Abstract

The goal of this study was to determine whether measures of proactive and reactive criminal thinking display divergent patterns of correlation with outside criteria. A sample of 3,039 male medium-security federal prisoners who completed the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS) served as participants in this study. Despite being highly correlated ( = .75), the PICTS proactive and reactive scales displayed divergent patterns of correlation with the eight risk/outcome measures. As predicted, the proactive scale corresponded with lower criminal risk, older age of first conviction, and decreased odds of prior substance misuse and mental illness, whereas the reactive scale corresponded with higher criminal risk, earlier age of first conviction, greater odds of prior substance misuse and mental illness, and more evidence of subsequent arrest. Contrary to predictions, the proactive scale was associated with increased rather than decreased commission of disciplinary infractions in prison. When participants with elevated proactive scores were compared to participants with elevated reactive scores on the eight risk/outcome variables, the results revealed that the two profiles were moderately negatively correlated. Thus, although proactive criminal thinking is associated with below-average criminal risk and below-average future negative outcomes, reactive criminal thinking does just the opposite.

摘要

本研究旨在确定主动和被动犯罪思维的衡量标准与外部标准的相关性是否存在差异。该研究的参与者是 3039 名完成《犯罪思维方式心理评估》(PICTS)的男性中度安全联邦囚犯。尽管这两个量表高度相关(r=0.75),但它们与八种风险/结果测量的相关性存在差异。正如预测的那样,主动量表与较低的犯罪风险、较晚的首次定罪年龄、较少的药物滥用和精神疾病史相关,而被动量表与较高的犯罪风险、较早的首次定罪年龄、更多的药物滥用和精神疾病史、以及更多的后续逮捕证据相关。与预测相反,主动量表与监狱中纪律违规行为的增加而不是减少有关。当将高主动得分的参与者与高被动得分的参与者在八项风险/结果变量上进行比较时,结果表明这两种特征呈中度负相关。因此,尽管主动犯罪思维与平均犯罪风险和平均未来负面结果相关,但被动犯罪思维则恰恰相反。

相似文献

1
Assessing the Proactive and Reactive Dimensions of Criminal Thought Process: Divergent Patterns of Correlation With Variable- and Person-Level Measures of Criminal Risk and Future Outcome.评估犯罪思维过程的主动性和反应性维度:与犯罪风险和未来结果的变量和个体水平测量的相关模式的差异。
J Pers Assess. 2020 Mar-Apr;102(2):223-230. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1508469. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
2
Criminal thinking as a bipolar dimensional construct: Testing the risk-promotive status of the PICTS proactive and reactive criminal thinking scales.作为一种双相维度结构的犯罪思维:检验 PICTS 主动和反应性犯罪思维量表的风险促进状态。
Psychol Assess. 2023 Dec;35(12):1152-1157. doi: 10.1037/pas0001277. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
3
An exploration of criminal thinking styles among civil psychiatric patients.民事精神病患者犯罪思维方式探究。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2009;19(5):334-46. doi: 10.1002/cbm.749.
4
Toward a hierarchical model of criminal thinking: evidence from item response theory and confirmatory factor analysis.迈向犯罪思维的层级模型:来自项目反应理论和验证性因素分析的证据。
Psychol Assess. 2011 Dec;23(4):925-36. doi: 10.1037/a0024017. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
5
Postdicting arrests for proactive and reactive aggression with the PICTS Proactive and Reactive composite scales.使用PICTS主动和反应性综合量表对主动和反应性攻击行为的逮捕情况进行事后预测。
J Interpers Violence. 2007 Nov;22(11):1415-30. doi: 10.1177/0886260507305556.
6
Measuring proactive and reactive criminal thinking with the PICTS: correlations with outcome expectancies and hostile attribution biases.使用PICTS测量主动和被动犯罪思维:与结果预期和敌意归因偏差的相关性。
J Interpers Violence. 2007 Apr;22(4):371-85. doi: 10.1177/0886260506296988.
7
Construct validity of the psychological inventory of criminal thinking styles in relationship to the PAI, disciplinary adjustment, and program completion.犯罪思维方式心理量表与人格评估问卷、纪律调整及项目完成情况相关的结构效度。
J Pers Assess. 2005 Jun;84(3):252-60. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8403_04.
8
Substance abuse and criminal thinking: testing the countervailing, mediation, and specificity hypotheses.物质滥用与犯罪思维:检验制衡、中介和特异性假设。
Law Hum Behav. 2012 Dec;36(6):506-12. doi: 10.1037/h0093936. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
9
Criminal thinking styles and emotional intelligence in Egyptian offenders.埃及罪犯的犯罪思维方式与情商
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2013 Feb;23(1):56-71. doi: 10.1002/cbm.1854. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
10
Effect of test administration set on the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS).测试施测套件对犯罪思维方式心理量表(PICTS)的影响。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2006 Dec;50(6):661-71. doi: 10.1177/0306624X06287192.

引用本文的文献

1
SLC25A24 gene methylation and gray matter volume in females with and without conduct disorder: an exploratory epigenetic neuroimaging study.SLC25A24 基因甲基化与伴或不伴品行障碍女性的灰质体积:一项探索性的表观遗传学神经影像学研究。
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 24;11(1):492. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01609-y.