Vanoni Federica, Caorsi Roberta, Aeby Sandra, Cochard Marie, Antón Jordi, Berg Stefan, Brik Riva, Dolezalova Pavla, Koné-Paut Isabelle, Neven Benedicte, Ozen Seza, Pillet Pascal, Stojanov Silvia, Wouters Carine, Gattorno Marco, Hofer Michaël
Istituto Pediatrico della Svizzera Italiana, Ospedale San Giovanni, 6500, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Unité Romande d'Immuno-rhumatologie Pédiatrique, CHUV, University of Lausanne, Lausanne and HUG, Geneva, Switzerland.
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2018 Sep 21;16(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12969-018-0277-2.
Diagnosis of Periodic Fever, Aphthous stomatitis, Pharyngitis and Cervical Adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome is currently based on the modified Marshall's criteria, but no validated evidence based classification criteria for PFAPA has been established so far.
A multistep process, based on the Delphi and Nominal Group Technique was conducted. After 2 rounds of e-mail Delphi survey involving 21 experts in autoinflammation we obtained a list of variables that were discussed in an International Consensus Conference. Variables reaching the 80% of consensus between participants were included in the new classification criteria. In the second phase the new classification criteria and the modified Marshall's criteria were applied on a cohort of 80 pediatric PFAPA patients to compare their performance.
The Delphi Survey was sent to 22 participants, 21 accepted to participate. Thirty variables were obtained from the survey and have been discussed at the Consensus Conference. Through the Nominal Group Technique we obtained a new set of classification criteria. These criteria were more restrictive in respect to the modified Marshall's criteria when applied on our cohort of patients.
Our work led us to identify a new set of classification criteria for PFAPA syndrome, but they resulted to be too restrictive to be applied in daily clinical practice for the diagnosis of PFAPA.
周期性发热、口疮性口炎、咽炎和颈淋巴结炎(PFAPA)综合征目前的诊断基于改良的马歇尔标准,但迄今为止尚未建立经过验证的基于证据的PFAPA分类标准。
采用基于德尔菲法和名义群体技术的多步骤流程。在两轮电子邮件德尔菲调查中,涉及21名自身炎症领域专家,我们获得了一份在国际共识会议上讨论的变量清单。参与者之间达成80%共识的变量被纳入新的分类标准。在第二阶段,新的分类标准和改良的马歇尔标准应用于80例儿科PFAPA患者队列,以比较它们的性能。
德尔菲调查发送给22名参与者,21名接受参与。从调查中获得30个变量,并在共识会议上进行了讨论。通过名义群体技术,我们获得了一组新的分类标准。当应用于我们的患者队列时,这些标准相对于改良的马歇尔标准更为严格。
我们的工作使我们确定了一组PFAPA综合征的新分类标准,但结果表明这些标准过于严格,无法应用于PFAPA诊断的日常临床实践。