• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估高危成年囚犯群体中自我伤害的可预测性:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Assessing the predictability of self-harm in a high-risk adult prisoner population: a prospective cohort study.

作者信息

Horton Mike C, Dyer Wendy, Tennant Alan, Wright Nat M J

机构信息

Section of Rehabilitation Medicine, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, D Floor, Martin Wing, LGI, LS1 3EX, Leeds, UK.

School of Arts and Social Sciences, Northumbria University, Lipman Building Room 216, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK.

出版信息

Health Justice. 2018 Sep 21;6(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40352-018-0076-3.

DOI:10.1186/s40352-018-0076-3
PMID:30242541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6755554/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prisoners are at increased risk of self-harm and when either intent is expressed, or an act of self-harm carried out, prisoners in the UK are subject to self-harm/suicide monitoring (referred to as "open ACCT" monitoring). However, there is a paucity of validated instruments to identify risk of self-harm in prisoner populations. In response to the need to support prison staff to determine who is at increased risk of self-harm or repeat self-harm, the aim of this study was to determine whether any pre-existing, standardised instruments could usefully identify future self-harm events in prisoners undergoing ACCT monitoring.

METHODS

A multi-stage prospective cohort study was conducted, where the Prison Screening Questionnaire (PriSnQuest), a modified Borderline Symptom List-23 (BSL-23), Self-Harm Inventory (SHI), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) instruments were administered to prisoners aged 18 and above, who were judged to be at an increased risk of self-harm (on open ACCT monitoring) during the recruitment phase. A 6-month follow-up determined self-harm occurrence since baseline, and Area-Under-the-Curve (AUC) analysis examined the ability of the instruments to predict future self-harm.

RESULTS

Prison records established that 29.1% self-harmed during the follow up period, involving a total of 423 self-harm events reported from 126 individuals, followed up for 66,789 prisoner days (median 167 days; IQR 71-207.5 days). This translated to an 'event incidence' of 6.33 per 1000 prisoner days of those who had been placed upon an ACCT, or 'prisoner incidence' of 1.89 per 1000 days, with considerable variation for both gender and participating prisons. None of the summary scores derived from the selected instruments showed a meaningful ability to predict self-harm, however, exploratory logistic regression analysis of individual background and instrument items revealed gender-specific item sets which were statistically significant in predicting future self-harm.

CONCLUSIONS

Prospective self-harm was not predicted by any of the pre-existing instruments that were under consideration. Exploratory logistic regression analysis did reveal gender-specific item sets, producing predictive algorithms which were statistically significant in predicting future self-harm; however, the operational functionality of these item sets may be limited.

摘要

背景

囚犯自残风险较高,在英国,一旦有自残意图表达或发生自残行为,囚犯就会受到自残/自杀监测(称为“开放式ACCT”监测)。然而,缺乏经过验证的工具来识别囚犯群体中的自残风险。为了满足支持监狱工作人员确定谁有更高自残或重复自残风险的需求,本研究的目的是确定是否有任何现有的标准化工具能够有效识别接受ACCT监测的囚犯未来的自残事件。

方法

进行了一项多阶段前瞻性队列研究,向18岁及以上、在招募阶段被判定有更高自残风险(处于开放式ACCT监测)的囚犯发放监狱筛查问卷(PriSnQuest)、改良版边缘症状清单-23(BSL-23)、自残量表(SHI)、患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)和常规评估临床结果-结果测量(CORE-OM)工具。6个月的随访确定了自基线以来的自残发生情况,曲线下面积(AUC)分析检验了这些工具预测未来自残的能力。

结果

监狱记录显示,在随访期间29.1%的人有自残行为,共报告了来自126人的423起自残事件,随访了66789个囚犯日(中位数167天;四分位间距71 - 207.5天)。这相当于被置于ACCT监测的人每1000个囚犯日的“事件发生率”为6.33,或每1000天的“囚犯发生率”为1.89,性别和参与研究的监狱之间差异很大。从所选工具得出的汇总分数均未显示出有意义的预测自残的能力,然而,对个体背景和工具项目的探索性逻辑回归分析揭示了特定性别的项目集,这些项目集在预测未来自残方面具有统计学意义。

结论

所考虑的任何现有工具均未预测到前瞻性自残情况。探索性逻辑回归分析确实揭示了特定性别的项目集,生成了在预测未来自残方面具有统计学意义的预测算法;然而,这些项目集的操作功能可能有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c4/6755554/dedb136fc365/40352_2018_76_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c4/6755554/fab2c521e90b/40352_2018_76_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c4/6755554/dedb136fc365/40352_2018_76_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c4/6755554/fab2c521e90b/40352_2018_76_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98c4/6755554/dedb136fc365/40352_2018_76_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the predictability of self-harm in a high-risk adult prisoner population: a prospective cohort study.评估高危成年囚犯群体中自我伤害的可预测性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Health Justice. 2018 Sep 21;6(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40352-018-0076-3.
2
Assessing the risk of self-harm in an adult offender population: an incidence cohort study.评估成年罪犯群体中的自残风险:一项发病率队列研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Oct;18(64):1-151, vii-viii. doi: 10.3310/hta18640.
3
Predicting self-harm in prisoners: Risk factors and a prognostic model in a cohort of 542 prison entrants.预测囚犯自残行为:542 名新入狱囚犯队列中的风险因素和预后模型。
Eur Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 28;63(1):e42. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.40.
4
Self-harm and overcrowding among prisoners in Geneva, Switzerland.瑞士日内瓦监狱中的自残行为与过度拥挤现象。
Int J Prison Health. 2016;12(1):39-44. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-04-2015-0009.
5
Environmental risk factors for self-harm during imprisonment: A pilot prospective cohort study.监禁期间自我伤害的环境风险因素:一项前瞻性队列试点研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 4;20(2):e0318200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318200. eCollection 2025.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Detecting and predicting self-harm behaviour in prisoners: a prospective psychometric analysis of three instruments.检测和预测囚犯的自残行为:三种工具的前瞻性心理测量分析
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;44(10):853-61. doi: 10.1007/s00127-009-0007-7. Epub 2009 Mar 12.
8
Self-harm in prisons in England and Wales: an epidemiological study of prevalence, risk factors, clustering, and subsequent suicide.英格兰和威尔士监狱中的自残行为:流行率、风险因素、聚集性和随后自杀的流行病学研究。
Lancet. 2014 Mar 29;383(9923):1147-54. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62118-2. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
9
Profiles of vulnerability for suicide and self-harm in UK prisoners: Neurodisability, mood disturbance, substance use, and bullying.英国囚犯自杀和自残脆弱性特征:神经残疾、情绪障碍、物质使用和欺凌。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 3;19(1):e0296078. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296078. eCollection 2024.
10
Problem-solving training: assessing the feasibility and acceptability of delivering and evaluating a problem-solving training model for front-line prison staff and prisoners who self-harm.解决问题培训:评估为一线监狱工作人员和有自残行为的囚犯提供并评估一种解决问题培训模式的可行性和可接受性。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 3;9(10):e026095. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026095.

引用本文的文献

1
Using the stress-vulnerability model to better understand suicide in prison populations.运用压力易感性模型更好地理解监狱人群中的自杀行为。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2022 Feb 15;30(3):299-333. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.2013340. eCollection 2023.
2
Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Prevention of Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviour in Prisons: A Literature Review.监狱中自杀念头和行为的流行病学、风险因素及预防:文献综述
Psychol Belg. 2021 Nov 22;61(1):341-355. doi: 10.5334/pb.1072. eCollection 2021.
3
Liability and Patient Suicide.责任与患者自杀

本文引用的文献

1
Rise of the machines? Machine learning approaches and mental health: opportunities and challenges.机器的崛起?机器学习方法与心理健康:机遇与挑战。
Br J Psychiatry. 2018 Sep;213(3):509-510. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2018.105.
2
Accuracy and predictive value of incarcerated adults' accounts of their self-harm histories: findings froman Australian prospective data linkage study.被监禁成年人自述自残史的准确性和预测价值:一项澳大利亚前瞻性数据关联研究的结果
CMAJ Open. 2017 Sep 11;5(3):E694-E701. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20170058.
3
Interactive machine learning for health informatics: when do we need the human-in-the-loop?
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2019 Oct;17(4):349-354. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20190023. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
健康信息学中的交互式机器学习:何时需要人工介入?
Brain Inform. 2016 Jun;3(2):119-131. doi: 10.1007/s40708-016-0042-6. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
4
Predicting suicide following self-harm: systematic review of risk factors and risk scales.预测自伤后自杀:风险因素和风险评估量表的系统综述。
Br J Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;209(4):277-283. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.115.170050. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
5
Cross examination of clinicians at coroners' inquests following deaths in custody.对羁押期间死亡事件进行死因裁判庭聆讯时对临床医生的交叉询问。
Int J Prison Health. 2012;8(3-4):92-8. doi: 10.1108/17449201211284969.
6
Alcohol use and misuse, self-harm and subsequent mortality: an epidemiological and longitudinal study from the multicentre study of self-harm in England.饮酒与酗酒、自我伤害及后续死亡率:来自英国自我伤害多中心研究的一项流行病学与纵向研究
Emerg Med J. 2015 Oct;32(10):793-9. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202753. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
7
Assessing the risk of self-harm in an adult offender population: an incidence cohort study.评估成年罪犯群体中的自残风险:一项发病率队列研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Oct;18(64):1-151, vii-viii. doi: 10.3310/hta18640.
8
Scales for predicting risk following self-harm: an observational study in 32 hospitals in England.预测自伤后风险的量表:在英国32家医院进行的一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 May 2;4(5):e004732. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004732.
9
Preventing self-harm and suicide in prisoners: job half done.预防囚犯的自我伤害和自杀:工作完成了一半。
Lancet. 2014 Mar 29;383(9923):1109-11. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62571-4. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
10
Self-harm in prisons in England and Wales: an epidemiological study of prevalence, risk factors, clustering, and subsequent suicide.英格兰和威尔士监狱中的自残行为:流行率、风险因素、聚集性和随后自杀的流行病学研究。
Lancet. 2014 Mar 29;383(9923):1147-54. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62118-2. Epub 2013 Dec 16.