Centre for Fetal Care, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; Institute for Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Centre for Fetal Care, Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;220(1):96.e1-96.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.017. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
The mechanism underlying fetal-placental Doppler index changes in preeclampsia and/or fetal growth restriction are unknown, although both are associated with maternal cardiovascular dysfunction.
We sought to investigate whether there was a relationship between maternal cardiac output and vascular resistance and fetoplacental Doppler findings in healthy and complicated pregnancy.
Women with healthy pregnancies (n=62), preeclamptic pregnancies (n=13), preeclamptic pregnancies with fetal growth restriction (n=15), or fetal growth restricted pregnancies (n=17) from 24-40 weeks gestation were included. All of them underwent measurement of cardiac output with the use of an inert gas rebreathing technique and derivation of peripheral vascular resistance. Uterine and fetal Doppler indices were recorded; the latter were z scored to account for gestation. Associations were determined by polynomial regression analyses.
Mean uterine artery pulsatility index was higher in fetal growth restriction (1.37; P=.026) and preeclampsia+fetal growth restriction (1.63; P=.001) but not preeclampsia (0.92; P=1) compared with control subjects (0.8). There was a negative relationship between uterine pulsatility index and cardiac output (r=0.101; P=.025) and umbilical pulsatility index z score and cardiac output (r=0.078; P=.0015), and there were positive associations between uterine pulsatility index and peripheral vascular resistance (r=0.150; P=.003) and umbilical pulsatility index z score and peripheral vascular resistance (r= 0.145; P=.001). There was no significant relationship between cardiac output and peripheral vascular resistance with cerebral Doppler indices.
Uterine artery Doppler change is abnormally elevated in fetal growth restriction with and without preeclampsia, but not in preeclampsia, which may explain the limited sensitivity of uterine artery Doppler changes for all these complications when considered in aggregate. Furthermore, impedance within fetoplacental arterial vessels is at least, in part, associated with maternal cardiovascular function. This relationship may have important implications for fetal surveillance and would inform therapeutic options in those pathologic pregnancy conditions currently, and perhaps erroneously, attributed purely to placental maldevelopment. Uterine and fetal placental Doppler indices are associated significantly with maternal cardiovascular function. The classic description of uterine and fetal Doppler changes being initiated by placental maldevelopment is a less plausible explanation for the pathogenesis of the conditions than that relating to maternal cardiovascular changes.
子痫前期和/或胎儿生长受限的胎儿胎盘多普勒指数变化的机制尚不清楚,尽管两者均与母体心血管功能障碍有关。
我们试图研究健康妊娠和复杂妊娠中母体心输出量和血管阻力与胎儿胎盘多普勒检查结果之间是否存在关系。
本研究纳入了 24-40 孕周的健康妊娠孕妇(n=62)、子痫前期孕妇(n=13)、子痫前期合并胎儿生长受限孕妇(n=15)和胎儿生长受限孕妇(n=17)。所有孕妇均采用惰性气体再呼吸技术测量心输出量,并计算外周血管阻力。记录子宫和胎儿多普勒指数;后者被 z 评分以反映胎龄。通过多项式回归分析确定相关性。
与对照组(0.8)相比,胎儿生长受限(1.37;P=.026)和子痫前期+胎儿生长受限(1.63;P=.001)的子宫动脉搏动指数更高,但子痫前期(0.92;P=1)的子宫动脉搏动指数无显著差异。子宫搏动指数与心输出量呈负相关(r=0.101;P=.025),脐动脉搏动指数 z 评分与心输出量呈负相关(r=0.078;P=.0015),而子宫动脉搏动指数与外周血管阻力呈正相关(r=0.150;P=.003),脐动脉搏动指数 z 评分与外周血管阻力呈正相关(r=0.145;P=.001)。心输出量和外周血管阻力与大脑多普勒指数之间无显著相关性。
胎儿生长受限合并或不合并子痫前期时,子宫动脉多普勒变化异常升高,但子痫前期时无明显升高,这可能解释了将这些并发症综合考虑时,子宫动脉多普勒变化对所有这些并发症的敏感性有限。此外,胎儿胎盘血管内的阻抗至少部分与母体心血管功能有关。这种关系对胎儿监测具有重要意义,并为目前在病理妊娠条件下,或许错误地归因于胎盘发育不良的治疗选择提供信息。子宫和胎儿胎盘多普勒指数与母体心血管功能显著相关。与胎盘发育不良引发子宫和胎儿多普勒变化的经典描述相比,与母体心血管变化相关的发病机制更合理。