Schwarcz R, Speciale C, Okuno E, French E D, Köhler C
Adv Exp Med Biol. 1986;203:697-707. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-7971-3_53.
The evidence for an involvement of QUIN in human seizure disorders is clearly circumstantial. Importantly, QUIN is not a classical neurotransmitter and may thus play only a negligible or no role at all in normal brain function (Foster et al., 1984). We have yet to understand if and how such a possibly inert metabolite may turn into a pathogen. Several crucial questions remain to be addressed before a case can be made for a 'quinolinic acid hypothesis' of temporal lobe epilepsy. Among the most prominent ones figure the extracellular concentration of QUIN in the human brain under normal and pathological ('epileptic') conditions, the relationship between QUIN metabolism in the brain and its extracellular concentration and, a related issue, the regulation of cerebral QUIN metabolism (i.e., turnover). It is of equal importance to assess if NMDA-receptors, particularly those in the hippocampus and other parts of the limbic system, can exert a modulatory function upon brain QUIN. Unquestionably, future experiments with selective NMDA-antagonists will prove useful for the elucidation of such possible (feedback) interactions.
有关喹啉酸(QUIN)参与人类癫痫疾病的证据显然只是间接的。重要的是,QUIN并非经典神经递质,因此在正常脑功能中可能仅发挥微不足道的作用或根本不起作用(福斯特等人,1984年)。我们尚不清楚这样一种可能无活性的代谢物是否以及如何转变为病原体。在提出颞叶癫痫的“喹啉酸假说”之前,仍有几个关键问题有待解决。其中最突出的问题包括正常和病理(“癫痫”)状态下人脑中QUIN的细胞外浓度、脑内QUIN代谢与其细胞外浓度之间的关系,以及一个相关问题,即脑QUIN代谢(即周转)的调节。评估N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体,尤其是海马体和边缘系统其他部位的受体是否能对脑QUIN发挥调节作用同样重要。毫无疑问,未来使用选择性NMDA拮抗剂的实验将有助于阐明此类可能的(反馈)相互作用。