• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1706例行桡动脉导管插入术患者经桡动脉途径术后手臂疼痛的预测因素。

The Predictors of Post-Procedural Arm Pain after Transradial Approach in 1706 Patients Underwent Transradial Catheterization.

作者信息

Dharma Surya, Kedev Sasko, Patel Tejas, Gilchrist Ian C, Rao Sunil V

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, Indonesian Cardiovascular Research Center, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, University Clinic of Cardiology, University of St Cyril & Methodius, Vodnjanska 17, Skopje, Macedonia.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Aug;20(8):674-677. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.carrev.2018.09.006
PMID:30245153
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although patients prefer radial over femoral approach, some develop post-procedural arm pain after transradial procedures. This complication has been poorly defined in prior studies. We evaluated the extent of non-ischemic arm pain after transradial arterial access and identify variables that may be associated with this complication.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of a 1706 patient database on patients who underwent transradial catheterization at three experienced radial centers. Arm pain was assessed by adult visual analogue scale (score > 4) defined as moderate to severe pain at the accessed forearm not related to hand ischemia and was evaluated at one day after the procedure. Logistic regression was used to identify the predictors of post-procedural arm pain.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of post-procedural arm pain one day after a transradial procedure was 4.5%. Covariate associated with post-procedural arm pain were hemostasis compression >4 h (odds ratio (OR) = 29.47, p < 0.001), radial artery occlusion by Doppler evaluation (OR = 3.35, p < 0.001), radial artery diameter < 2.8 mm (OR = 2.66, p = 0.01), and multiple puncture attempts (OR = 2.31, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Approximately 1 in 20 patients undergoing transradial procedure have post-procedural arm pain one day after the procedure. Predictors of this complication relate to radial hemostasis, radial artery occlusion, radial artery diameter, and number of access attempts.

摘要

背景

尽管患者更喜欢经桡动脉途径而非股动脉途径,但一些患者在经桡动脉手术后会出现术后手臂疼痛。先前的研究对这种并发症的定义并不明确。我们评估了经桡动脉穿刺术后非缺血性手臂疼痛的程度,并确定了可能与这种并发症相关的变量。

方法

我们对三个经验丰富的桡动脉中心进行经桡动脉导管插入术的1706例患者的数据库进行了回顾性分析。采用成人视觉模拟量表(评分>4)评估手臂疼痛,定义为穿刺侧前臂中度至重度疼痛,与手部缺血无关,并在术后一天进行评估。采用逻辑回归分析确定术后手臂疼痛的预测因素。

结果

经桡动脉手术后一天,术后手臂疼痛的总体发生率为4.5%。与术后手臂疼痛相关的协变量包括止血压迫>4小时(比值比(OR)=29.47,p<0.001)、多普勒评估显示桡动脉闭塞(OR=3.35,p<0.001)、桡动脉直径<2.8mm(OR=2.66,p=0.01)和多次穿刺尝试(OR=2.31,p=0.03)。

结论

大约每20例接受经桡动脉手术的患者中就有1例在术后一天出现术后手臂疼痛。这种并发症的预测因素与桡动脉止血、桡动脉闭塞、桡动脉直径和穿刺尝试次数有关。

相似文献

1
The Predictors of Post-Procedural Arm Pain after Transradial Approach in 1706 Patients Underwent Transradial Catheterization.1706例行桡动脉导管插入术患者经桡动脉途径术后手臂疼痛的预测因素。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Aug;20(8):674-677. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
2
A novel approach to reduce radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization: postprocedural/prehemostasis intra-arterial nitroglycerin.一种减少经桡动脉导管插入术后桡动脉闭塞的新方法:术后/止血前动脉内注射硝酸甘油。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr;85(5):818-25. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25661. Epub 2014 Sep 13.
3
Prevention of Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Catheterization: The PROPHET-II Randomized Trial.经桡动脉入路导管介入术后预防桡动脉闭塞:PROPHET-II 随机试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct 10;9(19):1992-1999. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.020.
4
Postprocedural radial artery occlusion rate using a sheathless guiding catheter for left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy performed by transradial approach.经桡动脉途径使用无鞘引导导管进行左心室心内膜活检后的桡动脉闭塞率。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Dec 8;16(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0432-y.
5
The long-term incidence and predictors of radial artery occlusion following a transradial coronary procedure.经桡动脉冠状动脉介入术后桡动脉闭塞的长期发生率及预测因素。
Cardiol J. 2014;21(4):350-6. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2013.0128. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
6
Radial artery spasm associated with transradial cardiovascular procedures: results from the RAS registry.经桡动脉心血管介入术后发生的桡动脉痉挛:RAS 注册研究结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan 1;83(1):E32-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25082. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
7
Different Spasmolytic Regimens (Nitroglycerin vs Verapamil) and the Incidence of Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Catheterization.不同解痉方案(硝酸甘油与维拉帕米)与经桡动脉导管插入术后桡动脉闭塞的发生率
J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 Dec;30(12):461-464.
8
Transradial interventions in contemporary vascular surgery practice.当代血管外科实践中的经桡动脉介入治疗。
Vascular. 2019 Feb;27(1):110-116. doi: 10.1177/1708538118797556. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
9
Safety and Feasibility of Transradial Access for Noncoronary and Peripheral Vascular Interventions.经桡动脉途径用于非冠状动脉及外周血管介入治疗的安全性与可行性
Ann Vasc Surg. 2018 Nov;53:255-261. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
10
Prevention of radial artery occlusion-patent hemostasis evaluation trial (PROPHET study): a randomized comparison of traditional versus patency documented hemostasis after transradial catheterization.桡动脉闭塞预防-通畅止血评估试验(PROPHET研究):经桡动脉导管插入术后传统止血与记录通畅性止血的随机对照比较
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Sep 1;72(3):335-340. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21639.

引用本文的文献

1
Simultaneous Radial and Ipsilateral Ulnar Artery Compression versus Isolated Radial Artery Compression after Conventional Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and/or Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.冠状动脉造影和/或介入治疗传统桡动脉入路后同时压迫桡动脉和同侧尺动脉与单纯压迫桡动脉的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 27;11(23):7013. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237013.
2
Procedure-Related Access Site Pain Multimodal Management following Percutaneous Cardiac Intervention: A Randomized Control Trial.经皮心脏介入术后与操作相关的入路部位疼痛的多模式管理:一项随机对照试验。
Pain Res Manag. 2022 Jan 24;2022:6102793. doi: 10.1155/2022/6102793. eCollection 2022.
3
Predictive Factors for Access-Site Pain Chronicity after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Radial Artery Access.
经桡动脉入路行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后穿刺部位疼痛慢性化的预测因素。
Pain Res Manag. 2020 Nov 16;2020:8887499. doi: 10.1155/2020/8887499. eCollection 2020.
4
Safety of ultrasound-guided distal radial artery access for abdominopelvic transarterial interventions: a prospective study.超声引导下经桡动脉远端入路用于腹盆部经动脉介入治疗的安全性:一项前瞻性研究。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2020 Nov;26(6):570-574. doi: 10.5152/dir.2020.19543.