Suppr超能文献

电子知情同意书:利用移动技术实现手术知情同意

e-Consent: approaching surgical consent with mobile technology.

作者信息

Bethune Allison, Davila-Foyo Marisol, Valli Mikaeel, da Costa Leodante

机构信息

From the Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Bethune, Costa, Davila-Foyo); and the Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. (Valli).

出版信息

Can J Surg. 2018 Oct 1;61(5):339-344. doi: 10.1503/cjs.016017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient recall of information about procedures, including risks and benefits and potential outcomes, is often insufficient. We sought to determine whether a multimedia educational tool enhances the informed consent discussion for elective neurosurgical procedures by increasing patient knowledge of the procedure.

METHODS

Adult patients from a single neurosurgical site eligible for 4 neurosurgical procedures (lumbar spine or cervical spine decompression for degenerative disease, craniotomy for brain tumour or trigeminal neuralgia treatment) were offered enrolment. Patients were randomly assigned to either the control arm (standard consent discussion) or the intervention arm (review of an e-book containing information tailored to their disease/injury plus standard consent discussion). Participants completed a 14-item questionnaire before and after the consent discussion.

RESULTS

Questionnaires were completed by 38 participants, 18 in the control group and 20 in the intervention group. The mean age was 62.2 (standard deviation [SD] 13.6) years and did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. The mean baseline questionnaire scores were similar for the control and intervention groups (20.4 [SD 7.3] v. 20.6 [SD 6.7]). However, the mean scores on the follow-up questionnaire were significantly different between the 2 groups (20.2 [SD 4.0] v. 23.2 [SD 4.9], = 0.02). There was no change in the scores on the 2 questionnaires in the control group, whereas, in the intervention group, the mean score was significantly higher after the intervention ( = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

The use of an electronic booklet appears to improve patients’ knowledge of their surgical procedure. The use of multimedia booklets in clinical practice could help standardize and optimize the consent process, ensuring that patients receive the relevant information to make a truly informed decision.

摘要

背景

患者对手术相关信息的回忆,包括风险、益处及潜在结果,往往并不充分。我们试图确定一种多媒体教育工具是否能通过增加患者对手术的了解,来加强择期神经外科手术的知情同意讨论。

方法

来自单一神经外科站点、符合4种神经外科手术(因退行性疾病行腰椎或颈椎减压术、因脑肿瘤或三叉神经痛行开颅手术)条件的成年患者可报名参加。患者被随机分配至对照组(标准同意讨论)或干预组(阅读一本针对其疾病/损伤定制信息的电子书并加上标准同意讨论)。参与者在同意讨论前后完成一份14项的问卷。

结果

38名参与者完成了问卷,其中对照组18名,干预组20名。平均年龄为62.2(标准差[SD]13.6)岁,两组间无显著差异。对照组和干预组的平均基线问卷得分相似(20.4[SD 7.3]对20.6[SD 6.7])。然而,两组随访问卷的平均得分有显著差异(20.2[SD 4.0]对23.2[SD 4.9],P = 0.02)。对照组两份问卷的得分无变化,而干预组干预后的平均得分显著更高(P = 0.03)。

结论

使用电子手册似乎能提高患者对其手术的了解。在临床实践中使用多媒体手册有助于规范和优化同意过程,确保患者获得相关信息以做出真正知情的决定。

相似文献

3

引用本文的文献

1
Digital consent in gynecology: an evaluation of patient experience.妇科数字知情同意:患者体验评估。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Feb;309(2):611-619. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07304-1. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
3
Improving Surgical Informed Consent: Unanswered Questions.改善手术知情同意书:未解决的问题。
Ann Surg Open. 2021 Jan 7;2(1):e030. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000030. eCollection 2021 Mar.

本文引用的文献

2
Language barriers to informed consent for dermatologic interventions.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 Feb;70(2):366-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.08.043.
4
Informed consent and relational conceptions of autonomy.知情同意与自主性的关系概念。
J Med Philos. 2011 Aug;36(4):375-84. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhr029. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
7
Predictors of comprehension during surgical informed consent.手术知情同意过程中理解能力的预测因素。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Jun;210(6):919-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.02.049.
8
Preoperative anxiety in neurosurgical patients.神经外科患者的术前焦虑
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2009 Apr;21(2):127-30. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e31819a6ca3.
10
Informed consent in cardiac surgery: is it truly informed?心脏手术中的知情同意:它真的是充分知情的吗?
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2006 Sep;7(9):675-81. doi: 10.2459/01.JCM.0000243001.59675.bf.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验