Singh Y N, Dryden W F, Chen H
Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1986 Nov;64(11):1446-50. doi: 10.1139/y86-245.
An electrophysiological study was made of the effects of four adenosine analogues, 2-chloroadenosine (2-CIA), 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA), L-N6-phenylisopropyladenosine (L-PIA), and 2-(p-methoxyphenyl)-adenosine (CV-1674) on neurotransmitter release in the mouse phrenic nerve - hemidiaphragm preparation. All four drugs decreased miniature end-plate potential frequency in a dose-dependent manner. Evoked transmitter release in the cut diaphragm preparation was depressed by 2-CIA and CV-1674 to a similar extent. The ability of theophylline to antagonize the inhibitory effect of CV-1674 on spontaneous transmitter release was also established. On the basis of these results, the rank order of potencies was: L-PIA greater than NECA greater than 2-CIA greater than CV-1674. A clear classification of receptor type could not be made, since the ratio of potencies of L-PIA and NECA was narrow. Different slopes of the concentration-effect curves for 2-CIA and CV-1674 compared with L-PIA and NECA suggest an additional component to simple agonist action in their overall effects.
对四种腺苷类似物,即2-氯腺苷(2-CIA)、5'-N-乙基甲酰胺基腺苷(NECA)、L-N6-苯异丙基腺苷(L-PIA)和2-(对甲氧基苯基)腺苷(CV-1674)对小鼠膈神经-半膈肌标本中神经递质释放的影响进行了电生理研究。所有这四种药物均以剂量依赖性方式降低微小终板电位频率。在切断膈膜的标本中,2-CIA和CV-上1674对诱发递质释放的抑制程度相似。还证实了茶碱拮抗CV-1674对自发递质释放抑制作用的能力。根据这些结果,效价顺序为:L-PIA>NECA>2-CIA>CV-1674。由于L-PIA和NECA的效价比范围较窄,因此无法明确受体类型。与L-PIA和NECA相比,2-CIA和CV-1674浓度-效应曲线的不同斜率表明,在它们的总体效应中,除了简单的激动剂作用外,还有其他因素。