Livingston R B, Schulman S, Mira J G, Harker G, Vogel S, Coltman C A, Rivkin S E, Budd G T, Grever M R, Crowley J P
Cancer Treat Rep. 1986 Dec;70(12):1395-401.
The Southwest Oncology Group performed a study for patients with extensive small cell lung cancer in which two hypotheses were tested: that combined alkylating agents for induction might improve the initial response rate; and that multiple-site, involved-field consolidation with irradiation in patients with response to chemotherapy might further improve response quality and duration. A regimen of combined alkylating agents plus vincristine [carmustine, thiotepa, vincristine, and cyclophosphamide (BTOC)] was compared to our standard program of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine (CAV). Patients with bone marrow metastases and/or disseminated bone metastases were randomized to BTOC or CAV as initial induction therapy, but received no multiple-field irradiation afterward. Among 189 such patients, the overall response rates were similar (48% to BTOC and 61% to CAV, with complete remission in 5% and 15%, respectively). Toxic effects were also comparative, with 23% sustaining life-threatening or fatal complications on BTOC and 16% on CAV. Median survival (5.9 and 7 months for BTOC and CAV, respectively) and overall survival were not different, and are superimposable upon our previously reported results with CAV alone. For patients with no evidence of bone marrow involvement and no metastases identified beyond the confines of ipsilateral hemithorax, liver, and brain, the plan of therapy consisted of induction chemotherapy (BTOC or CAV) every 3 weeks for three cycles, followed by multiple-field irradiation consolidation to sites of prior involvement. Among 239 such patients, response rates to therapy initiated with BTOC and CAV were also similar: 54% for BTOC and 62% for CAV, with complete response in 16% and 13%, respectively. However, the program of BTOC followed by multiple-site irradiation was associated with a higher incidence of severe or life-threatening thrombocytopenia (23% versus 8% for CAV), accounted for almost entirely by patients receiving hepatic irradiation after chemotherapy, among whom the incidence of this complication (grade 3 or 4) was 76% and 14%, respectively. Other toxic effects, including granulocytopenia, were comparable. With the exception of thrombocytopenia in the cited subgroup, multiple-field irradiation consolidation proved feasible and tolerable, with improved quality of response evident after its initiation in 24% of 135 patients. However, a similar proportion developed disease progression during or shortly after radiation therapy, and the median survival of patients who received irradiation was only 9 months (7 months from the start of consolidation).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
西南肿瘤协作组针对广泛期小细胞肺癌患者开展了一项研究,其中检验了两个假设:诱导治疗联合烷化剂可能提高初始缓解率;化疗有反应的患者采用多部位累及野放疗巩固治疗可能进一步提高缓解质量和持续时间。将联合烷化剂加长春新碱的方案[卡莫司汀、噻替派、长春新碱和环磷酰胺(BTOC)]与我们的环磷酰胺、多柔比星和长春新碱(CAV)标准方案进行比较。有骨髓转移和/或播散性骨转移的患者被随机分配接受BTOC或CAV作为初始诱导治疗,但之后不接受多野照射。在189例此类患者中,总体缓解率相似(BTOC组为48%,CAV组为61%,完全缓解率分别为5%和15%)。毒性反应也具有可比性,BTOC组有23%出现危及生命或致命的并发症,CAV组为16%。中位生存期(BTOC组和CAV组分别为5.9个月和7个月)和总生存期无差异,且与我们之前单独使用CAV时报告的结果相当。对于无骨髓受累证据且未发现同侧半胸、肝脏和脑范围以外转移的患者,治疗方案包括每3周进行诱导化疗(BTOC或CAV)共三个周期,随后对先前受累部位进行多野照射巩固治疗。在239例此类患者中,以BTOC和CAV开始治疗的缓解率也相似:BTOC组为54%,CAV组为