Toohill Jocelyn, Callander Emily, Fox Haylee, Lindsay Daniel, Gamble Jenny, Creedy Debra, Fenwick Jennifer
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, 68 University Dr, Meadowbrook, Qld 4131, Australia. Email: ;
Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Building 48, Douglas Campus, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia. Email:.
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Jan;43(6):639-643. doi: 10.1071/AH17271.
Objective Fear of childbirth is known to increase a woman's likelihood of having a Caesarean section. Continuity of midwifery care is known to reduce this risk, but less than 8% of women have access to this relationship-based, primary care model. The aims of this study were to determine whether healthcare use and access to continuity models are equal across different indicators of socioeconomic status for women who are fearful of birth. Methods A secondary analysis was conducted of data obtained during a randomised controlled trial of a psychoeducation intervention by trained midwives to minimise childbirth fear (the Birth Emotions and Looking to Improve Expectant Fear (BELIEF) study). In all, 1410 women were screened, with 339 women reporting high levels of fear (Wijma-Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire ≥66). Demographic, obstetric information, birth preference and psychosocial measures were collected at recruitment and at 36 weeks gestation for the 339 fearful women, with the birth method and health service use returned by 183 women at 6 weeks after the birth. Results Univariate analysis revealed no significant difference in the number of general practitioner and midwife visits between women of high and low income and high and low education. However, women with higher levels of education had 2.51-fold greater odds of seeing the same midwife throughout their pregnancy than women with lower education (95% confidence interval 1.25-5.04), after adjusting for age, parity and hospital site. Conclusions Given the known positive outcomes of continuity of midwifery care for women fearful of birth, health policy makers need to provide equity in access to evidence-based models of midwifery care. What is known about this topic? Caseload midwifery care is considered the gold standard care due to the known positive outcomes it has for the mother and baby during the perinatal period. Pregnant women who receive caseload midwifery care are more likely to experience a normal vaginal birth. What does this paper add? There is unequal access to midwifery caseload care for women fearful of birth across socioeconomic boundaries. Midwifery caseload care is not used for all fearful mothers during the perinatal period. What are the implications for practitioners? Health policy makers seeking to provide equity in access to maternity care should be aware of these inequalities in use to target delivery of care at this specific cohort of mothers.
目的 已知对分娩的恐惧会增加女性进行剖宫产的可能性。已知连续性助产护理可降低这种风险,但只有不到8%的女性能够获得这种基于关系的初级护理模式。本研究的目的是确定对于害怕分娩的女性,在不同社会经济地位指标方面,医疗保健的使用情况以及获得连续性护理模式的机会是否平等。方法 对在一项随机对照试验中获得的数据进行二次分析,该试验由训练有素的助产士进行心理教育干预以尽量减少分娩恐惧(分娩情绪与期望改善预期恐惧(BELIEF)研究)。总共筛查了1410名女性,其中339名女性报告有高度恐惧(维伊马分娩预期/体验问卷≥66)。在招募时以及妊娠36周时,收集了这339名恐惧女性的人口统计学、产科信息、分娩偏好和心理社会指标,183名女性在产后6周反馈了分娩方式和医疗服务使用情况。结果 单因素分析显示,高收入和低收入、高学历和低学历女性之间看全科医生和助产士的次数没有显著差异。然而,在调整年龄、产次和医院地点后,高学历女性在整个孕期看同一名助产士的几率比低学历女性高2.51倍(95%置信区间1.25 - 5.04)。结论 鉴于已知连续性助产护理对害怕分娩的女性有积极效果,卫生政策制定者需要确保在获得循证助产护理模式方面的公平性。关于这个主题已知的情况是什么?由于已知其在围产期对母婴有积极效果,个案管理助产护理被认为是黄金标准护理。接受个案管理助产护理的孕妇更有可能经历正常阴道分娩。本文补充了什么?对于害怕分娩的女性,在社会经济层面获得个案管理助产护理的机会不平等。围产期并非所有害怕分娩的母亲都能获得个案管理助产护理。对从业者有什么影响?寻求在提供产妇护理方面实现公平的卫生政策制定者应该意识到这些使用上的不平等,以便针对这一特定母亲群体提供护理。