Gidaszewski Beata, Khajehei Marjan, McGee Therese
Department of Women's and Newborn Health, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia.
Department of Women's and Newborn Health, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia; Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Midwifery. 2018 Dec;67:57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.09.012. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
To examine discomfort/pain associated with the Foley catheter insertion process and explore factors affecting discomfort/pain.
This cohort study conducted in the context of larger randomised clinical trial comparing silicone and latex Foley catheters.
A tertiary hospital in Western Sydney.
Outpatient pregnant women (eligible participants in the main study).
We asked about the discomfort/pain expectations and experience during the digital vaginal examination and insertion of the speculum, insertion of the Foley catheter and while the catheter was in situ.
We used visual analog scale and a purposefully designed questionnaire to measure outcomes.
We found digital vaginal examination and speculum insertion (mean pain score = 4.6-4.7/10) to be significantly more uncomfortable than Foley catheter insertion (mean pain score = 3/10), while having the catheter in situ for a median of 14 h was mid-way in discomfort (mean pain score = 3.7/10). Only 12-13% of women experienced no discomfort during digital vaginal examination and speculum insertion, while about 40% experienced no discomfort during Foley catheter insertion. We identified no factors that influenced the experience of discomfort during speculum insertion. However, being overseas-born (odds ratio = 1.91, 95% = 1.10, 3.33) and experiencing discomfort during the speculum insertion (odds ratio = 8.15, 95% = 3.19, 20.79) increased the chance of discomfort on catheter insertion. Women's discomfort was not influenced by inserter designation or experience.
Digital vaginal examination and speculum insertion were moderately uncomfortable while insertion of a Foley catheter and having the catheter in situ for several hours were less uncomfortable procedures.
Only 8% of insertions were rated as difficult by staff while 70% were rated easy. This, together with the fact that the inserter's level of experience had no influence on women's discomfort, are reassuring for midwives who wish to teach and learn this common procedure.
研究与福乐导尿管插入过程相关的不适/疼痛,并探讨影响不适/疼痛的因素。
本队列研究是在一项比较硅胶和乳胶福乐导尿管的大型随机临床试验背景下进行的。
西悉尼的一家三级医院。
门诊孕妇(主要研究的合格参与者)。
我们询问了在指诊阴道检查、插入窥阴器、插入福乐导尿管以及导尿管留置期间的不适/疼痛预期和体验。
我们使用视觉模拟量表和专门设计的问卷来测量结果。
我们发现指诊阴道检查和插入窥阴器(平均疼痛评分=4.6 - 4.7/10)比插入福乐导尿管(平均疼痛评分=3/10)明显更不舒服,而导尿管中位留置14小时的不适程度处于中间水平(平均疼痛评分=3.7/10)。只有12 - 13%的女性在指诊阴道检查和插入窥阴器期间没有不适,而约40%的女性在插入福乐导尿管期间没有不适。我们未发现影响插入窥阴器时不适体验的因素。然而,出生在海外(优势比=1.91,95% = 1.10,3.33)以及在插入窥阴器时感到不适(优势比=8.15,95% = 3.19,20.79)会增加插入导尿管时不适的几率。女性的不适不受插入者职称或经验的影响。
指诊阴道检查和插入窥阴器有中度不适,而插入福乐导尿管及导尿管留置数小时的操作不适程度较轻。
工作人员仅将8%的插入操作评为困难,而70%评为容易。这一点,再加上插入者的经验水平对女性不适没有影响,对于希望教授和学习这一常见操作的助产士来说是令人安心的。