Suppr超能文献

神经刺激治疗迟发性运动障碍/运动障碍:延迟启动、假刺激对照随机试验。

Neurostimulation in tardive dystonia/dyskinesia: A delayed start, sham stimulation-controlled randomized trial.

机构信息

Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany; Movement Disorders Clinic, Beelitz-Heilstaetten, Germany; Department of Neurology and Stereotactic Neurosurgery, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.

Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Brain Stimul. 2018 Nov-Dec;11(6):1368-1377. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Sep 11.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Growing evidence suggests that pallidal deep brain stimulation represents a potential new therapeutic avenue in tardive dystonia/dyskinesia, but controlled and blinded randomized studies (RCT) are missing. The present RCT compares dystonia/dyskinesia severity of pallidal neurostimulation in patients with tardive dystonia using a delayed-start design paradigm.

METHODS

Dystonia/dyskinesia severity was assessed via blinded videos following pallidal neurostimulation at 3 (blinded phase) and 6 months (open extension phase). Primary endpoint was the percentage change of dystonia severity (Burke-Fahn-Marsden-Dystonia-Rating-Scale, BFMDRS) at 3 months between active vs. sham neurostimulation using blinded-video assessment. Secondary endpoints comprised clinical rating scores for movement disorders. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00331669.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were randomized (1:1) to active (n = 12) or sham neurostimulation (n = 13). In the intention-to-treat analyses the between group difference of dystonia severity (BFMDRS) between active vs. sham stimulation was not significant at 3 months. Three months post-randomisation dystonia severity improved significantly within the neurostimulation by 22.8% and non-significantly within the sham group (12.0%) compared to their respective baseline severity. During the open-label extension with both groups being actively treated, significant and pronounced improvements of 41.5% were observed via blinded evaluation. Adverse events (n = 10) occurred in 10/25 of patients during the 6 months, mostly related to surgical implantation of the device; all resolved without sequelae.

CONCLUSION

The primary endpoint of this randomized trial was not significant, most likely due to incomplete recruitment. However, pronounced improvements of most secondary endpoints at 3 and 6 months provide evidence for efficacy and safety of pallidal neurostimulation in tardive dystonia.

摘要

简介

越来越多的证据表明,苍白球深部脑刺激在迟发性运动障碍/运动障碍中代表了一种新的潜在治疗途径,但缺乏对照和盲法随机研究(RCT)。本 RCT 采用延迟启动设计范式比较了迟发性运动障碍患者苍白球神经刺激的运动障碍/运动障碍严重程度。

方法

使用盲法视频评估在 3 个月(盲法阶段)和 6 个月(开放扩展阶段)进行苍白球神经刺激后的运动障碍/运动障碍严重程度。主要终点是使用盲法视频评估在 3 个月时主动 vs. 假神经刺激之间的运动障碍严重程度(Burke-Fahn-Marsden-Dystonia-Rating-Scale,BFMDRS)的百分比变化。次要终点包括运动障碍的临床评分。Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00331669。

结果

25 名患者被随机分为(1:1)主动(n=12)或假神经刺激(n=13)。在意向治疗分析中,主动 vs. 假刺激之间的运动障碍严重程度(BFMDRS)的组间差异在 3 个月时不显著。在随机分组后 3 个月,神经刺激组的运动障碍严重程度显著改善 22.8%,假刺激组非显著改善 12.0%,与各自的基线严重程度相比。在两组均接受主动治疗的开放标签扩展期间,通过盲法评估观察到显著且明显的 41.5%改善。在 6 个月期间,10/25 名患者发生了 10 起不良事件(AE),大多与设备的手术植入有关;所有不良事件均无后遗症解决。

结论

本随机试验的主要终点不显著,可能是由于不完全招募。然而,在 3 个月和 6 个月时大多数次要终点的显著改善提供了苍白球神经刺激在迟发性运动障碍中的疗效和安全性证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验