Aguilera Moisés A, Dobringer Johanne, Petit Ignacio J
Departamento de Biología Marina Facultad de Ciencias del Mar Universidad Católica del Norte Coquimbo Chile.
Programa Doctorado en Biología y Ecología Aplicada (BEA) Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Zonas Áridas (CEAZA) Universidad Católica del Norte Universidad de La Serena Coquimbo Chile.
Ecol Evol. 2018 Jul 25;8(16):8627-8638. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4371. eCollection 2018 Aug.
Ecological manipulative experiments conducted in marine coastal ecosystems have substantially improved ecological theory during the last decades and have provided useful knowledge for the management and conservation of coastal ecosystems. Although different studies report global trends in ecological patterns worldwide, Southeastern Pacific coastal ecosystems have been poorly considered. Given that the SE Pacific coast encompasses diverse coastal ecosystems, consideration of studies conducted along this range can shed light on the heterogeneity of processes regulating coastal communities. We reviewed the biotic interactions and habitat type considered, as well as the complexity in terms of spatial and temporal extent of manipulative field experimental studies conducted along the SE Pacific coast from 0°S to 56°S (Ecuador to Chile). We test the effect of funding reported by different studies as a main factor limiting experimental complexity. From field ecological studies published from 1970 to 2016, we found that 81 studies were truly manipulative, in which one or multiple factors were "manipulated." Around 77% of these studies were located between 21°S and 40°S, and conducted in intertidal rocky habitats. An increase in experimental studies was observed between 2010 and 2015, especially focused on herbivore-alga interactions, although we found that both the temporal extent and spatial extent of these studies have shown a decrease in recent decades. Funding grant amount reported had a positive effect on elapsed time of field experiments, but no effect was observed on spatial extent or in the biotic interactions considered. Elapsed time of experiments was different among the main biotic interactions considered, that is, herbivory, predation, and competition. We suggest that to further progress in applied ecological knowledge, it will be necessary to consider pollution and urbanization processes explicitly using a field experimental framework. This information could improve our understanding of how ecosystems present along the SE Pacific coast respond to climate change and increased levels of human interventions.
在过去几十年中,在海洋沿岸生态系统中进行的生态操纵实验极大地推动了生态理论的发展,并为沿海生态系统的管理和保护提供了有用的知识。尽管不同的研究报告了全球范围内生态模式的总体趋势,但东南太平洋沿岸生态系统却很少被纳入考虑。鉴于东南太平洋海岸包含多样的沿海生态系统,对该区域开展的研究进行考量,有助于揭示调节沿海群落过程的异质性。我们回顾了从0°S至56°S(从厄瓜多尔到智利)的东南太平洋海岸进行的操纵性野外实验研究中所涉及的生物相互作用、栖息地类型,以及在空间和时间范围方面的复杂性。我们检验了不同研究报告的资金投入作为限制实验复杂性的主要因素所产生的影响。从1970年至2016年发表的野外生态研究中,我们发现有81项研究属于真正的操纵性研究,其中一个或多个因素被“操纵”。这些研究中约77%位于21°S至40°S之间,且在潮间带岩石栖息地进行。在2010年至2015年期间,实验研究有所增加,尤其集中在食草动物与藻类的相互作用上,不过我们发现这些研究的时间范围和空间范围在近几十年均有所减小。报告的资金资助金额对野外实验的持续时间有积极影响,但对空间范围或所考虑的生物相互作用没有影响。在所考虑的主要生物相互作用(即食草作用、捕食作用和竞争作用)中,实验的持续时间有所不同。我们建议,为了在应用生态学知识方面取得进一步进展,有必要在野外实验框架中明确考虑污染和城市化进程。这些信息可以增进我们对东南太平洋沿岸生态系统如何应对气候变化和人类干预增加的理解。