• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病肾病新发腹膜透析患者的临床结局

Clinical outcome of incident peritoneal dialysis patients with diabetic kidney disease.

作者信息

Kishida Kyoko, Maruyama Yukio, Asari Kana, Nakao Masatsugu, Matsuo Nanae, Tanno Yudo, Ohkido Ichiro, Ikeda Masato, Yokoyama Keitaro, Yokoo Takashi

机构信息

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi Minato-ku, Tokyo, 1058461, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Exp Nephrol. 2019 Mar;23(3):409-414. doi: 10.1007/s10157-018-1646-3. Epub 2018 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1007/s10157-018-1646-3
PMID:30255261
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although peritoneal dialysis (PD) is becoming more widespread, PD among diabetic patients carries some concerns, such as worsened glycemic control due to constant exposure to glucose and operational errors due to diabetic complications. However, several technical advances could overcome these disadvantages. We, therefore, aimed to compare technical and patient survival between diabetic and non-diabetic PD patients.

METHODS

We conducted a historical cohort study of 103 patients (mean age, 57 ± 16 years; 75 males, 32 diabetic patients) who started PD between January 2011 and January 2016. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare technical and patient survivals between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to estimate the effects of the presence of diabetes on these outcomes.

RESULTS

Technical and patient survivals did not differ significantly between groups (P = 0.62, P = 0.34, respectively). In addition, presence of diabetes affected neither technical nor patient survival in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-2.82 and HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.22-2.68, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Technical and patient survivals of diabetic PD patients were not inferior to those of non-diabetic PD patients. These results suggest that no hesitation is warranted in initiating PD for diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease.

摘要

背景

尽管腹膜透析(PD)越来越普遍,但糖尿病患者的腹膜透析存在一些问题,例如因持续接触葡萄糖导致血糖控制恶化,以及因糖尿病并发症导致操作失误。然而,一些技术进步可以克服这些缺点。因此,我们旨在比较糖尿病和非糖尿病腹膜透析患者的技术生存率和患者生存率。

方法

我们对2011年1月至2016年1月开始进行腹膜透析的103例患者(平均年龄57±16岁;男性75例,糖尿病患者32例)进行了一项历史性队列研究。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析比较糖尿病和非糖尿病患者的技术生存率和患者生存率。多变量Cox回归分析用于评估糖尿病对这些结果的影响。

结果

两组之间的技术生存率和患者生存率无显著差异(分别为P = 0.62,P = 0.34)。此外,在多变量分析中,糖尿病的存在对技术生存率和患者生存率均无影响(风险比[HR]分别为1.31;95%置信区间[CI]为0.58 - 2.82和HR 0.80;95% CI为0.22 - 2.68)。

结论

糖尿病腹膜透析患者的技术生存率和患者生存率并不低于非糖尿病腹膜透析患者。这些结果表明,对于终末期肾病的糖尿病患者开始进行腹膜透析无需犹豫。

相似文献

1
Clinical outcome of incident peritoneal dialysis patients with diabetic kidney disease.糖尿病肾病新发腹膜透析患者的临床结局
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2019 Mar;23(3):409-414. doi: 10.1007/s10157-018-1646-3. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
2
[Current peritoneal dialysis compared with haemodialysis: medium-term survival analysis of incident dialysis patients in the Canary Islands in recent years].[近年来加那利群岛新入透析患者的中期生存分析:当前腹膜透析与血液透析的比较]
Nefrologia. 2011;31(2):174-84. doi: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2011.Jan.10743.
3
Better outcomes of peritoneal dialysis in diabetic patients in spite of risk of loss of autonomy for home dialysis.尽管存在家庭透析自主性丧失的风险,但糖尿病患者腹膜透析的预后更佳。
Perit Dial Int. 2014 Nov-Dec;34(7):775-80. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2012.00111. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
4
A comparison of medium-term survival between peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis in accordance with the initial vascular access.根据初始血管通路比较腹膜透析和血液透析的中期生存率。
Nefrologia. 2013;33(5):629-39. doi: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2013.May.12048.
5
Dialysis outcomes in Colombia (DOC) study: a comparison of patient survival on peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis in Colombia.哥伦比亚透析结果(DOC)研究:哥伦比亚腹膜透析与血液透析患者生存率比较
Kidney Int Suppl. 2008 Apr(108):S165-72. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002619.
6
Early initiation of peritoneal dialysis in diabetic patients.糖尿病患者腹膜透析的早期启动
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2009;43(2):148-53. doi: 10.1080/00365590802602903.
7
Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes between Peritoneal Dialysis Patients with Diabetes as a Primary Renal Disease or as a Comorbid Condition.原发性肾脏疾病为糖尿病或合并糖尿病的腹膜透析患者的长期结局比较。
PLoS One. 2015 May 11;10(5):e0126549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126549. eCollection 2015.
8
Is there impact of mortality prior hemodialysis therapy in peritoneal dialysis patients?腹膜透析患者行血液透析前死亡是否有影响?
Nefrologia. 2012 May 14;32(3):335-42. doi: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2012.Jan.11143. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
9
[Morbidity and mortality in diabetic patients on peritoneal dialysis. Twenty-five years of experience at a single centre].[糖尿病患者腹膜透析的发病率和死亡率。单一中心25年的经验]
Nefrologia. 2010;30(6):626-32. doi: 10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2010.Jul.10553.
10
Serum uric acid predicts cardiovascular mortality in male peritoneal dialysis patients with diabetes.血清尿酸可预测男性糖尿病腹膜透析患者的心血管死亡率。
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 Jan;26(1):20-6. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2015.10.011. Epub 2015 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio as a novel prognostic indicator in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis: a propensity score matching analysis.白蛋白与碱性磷酸酶比值作为腹膜透析患者的一种新型预后指标:倾向评分匹配分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 18;11:1302603. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1302603. eCollection 2024.
2
Prognostic implications of predialysis patients' symptoms in peritoneal dialysis patients.透析前患者症状对腹膜透析患者预后的影响。
Ren Fail. 2021 Dec;43(1):216-222. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2021.1871920.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk Predictors and Causes of Technique Failure Within the First Year of Peritoneal Dialysis: An Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA) Study.腹膜透析第一年的技术失败风险预测因素和原因:澳大利亚和新西兰透析和移植登记处(ANZDATA)研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Aug;72(2):188-197. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.10.019. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
2
ISPD Peritonitis Recommendations: 2016 Update on Prevention and Treatment.国际腹膜透析学会腹膜炎推荐意见:2016年预防与治疗更新版
Perit Dial Int. 2016 Sep 10;36(5):481-508. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2016.00078. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
3
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker use and cardiovascular outcomes in patients initiating peritoneal dialysis.
开始腹膜透析患者使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂与心血管结局
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017 May 1;32(5):862-869. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw053.
4
Glycemic Control Modifies Difference in Mortality Risk Between Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis in Incident Dialysis Patients With Diabetes: Results From a Nationwide Prospective Cohort in Korea.血糖控制改变糖尿病初治透析患者中血液透析与腹膜透析之间死亡率风险的差异:韩国一项全国性前瞻性队列研究的结果
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Mar;95(11):e3118. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003118.
5
33 Years of Peritoneal Dialysis-Associated Peritonitis: A Single-Center Study in Japan.33年的腹膜透析相关性腹膜炎:日本一项单中心研究
Ther Apher Dial. 2016 Feb;20(1):60-5. doi: 10.1111/1744-9987.12372. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
6
Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes between Peritoneal Dialysis Patients with Diabetes as a Primary Renal Disease or as a Comorbid Condition.原发性肾脏疾病为糖尿病或合并糖尿病的腹膜透析患者的长期结局比较。
PLoS One. 2015 May 11;10(5):e0126549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126549. eCollection 2015.
7
An overview of regular dialysis treatment in Japan (as of 31 December 2012).日本常规透析治疗概况(截至2012年12月31日)。
Ther Apher Dial. 2014 Dec;18(6):535-602. doi: 10.1111/1744-9987.12281.
8
Dialysis modality choice in diabetic patients with end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review of the available evidence.终末期肾病糖尿病患者的透析方式选择:现有证据的系统评价
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015 Feb;30(2):310-20. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfu293. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
9
The impact of diabetes mellitus on peritoneal dialysis: the Turkey Multicenter Clinic Study.糖尿病对腹膜透析的影响:土耳其多中心临床研究
Ren Fail. 2014 Mar;36(2):149-53. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2013.843275. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
10
Randomized, controlled trial of glucose-sparing peritoneal dialysis in diabetic patients.随机对照试验研究葡萄糖保存型腹膜透析在糖尿病患者中的应用。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Nov;24(11):1889-900. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012100987. Epub 2013 Aug 15.