Suppr超能文献

一项关于超大直径牙种植体即刻替代磨牙的前瞻性研究。

A prospective study on ultra-wide diameter dental implants for immediate molar replacement.

机构信息

Research Cluster Periodontology, Oral Implantology, Removable and Implant Prosthodontics, Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Private Practice for Periodontology and Oral Implantology, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Dec;20(6):1009-1015. doi: 10.1111/cid.12666. Epub 2018 Sep 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although wide diameter implants are well documented, little is known about ultra-wide diameter implants (>6 mm). This study evaluates the clinical outcome of ultra-wide diameter implants, placed in molar extraction sockets.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ultra-wide diameter implants (7-9 mm) were placed immediately after molar extraction in a 1-stage protocol, without raising a flap or using any bone grafts. After 4 months, the implant was loaded with a single screw-retained crown. Bone loss was evaluated using peri-apical radiographs. Plaque and bleeding were recorded. Crown and papilla dimensions were measured and compared with the contra-lateral tooth.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients (36 male and 15 female), mean ages 61 years old, were treated with 26 implants in the maxilla and 25 implants in the mandible. The majority had a thick (#19) or medium (#31) biotype. After a mean-follow-up period of 23 months, the mean bone level was located 1.16 mm apical of the implant-abutment junction (SD 0.42, range 0.00-2.45) while the actual bone remodeling associated with socket healing resulted in a mean coronal movement of the bone level of 0.15 mm. The mean insertion torque was 116 Ncm (SD 53, range 10-250). There were no differences in papilla height (P = .55), crown length (P = .32), zenith (P = .84), and bucco-palatal dimensions (P = .38). There was a significant difference in the mesio-distal dimension (P = .01). Mean probing depth was 2.59 mm at the implant and 2.23 mm at the contra-lateral tooth (P = .001). There was significantly more plaque at the tooth compared to the implant (P = .01), but there was no significant difference in terms of bleeding on probing (P = .08). Patient satisfaction was high with 72.5% of the patients experiencing no problems at all.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultra-wide diameter implants have a predictable outcome, demonstrating very little bone loss. Papilla and crown dimensions were comparable to the contra-lateral natural tooth.

摘要

背景

尽管宽直径种植体已有大量文献记载,但对于超宽直径种植体(>6 毫米)知之甚少。本研究评估了超宽直径种植体(7-9 毫米)在磨牙拔除后即刻植入的临床效果,采用一期手术,不翻瓣,不使用任何骨移植材料。4 个月后,种植体通过单颗螺丝固位冠进行负载。通过根尖周片评估骨吸收情况。记录菌斑和出血情况。测量并比较牙冠和牙乳头的尺寸与对侧同名牙。

结果

51 名患者(36 名男性和 15 名女性),平均年龄 61 岁,上颌 26 颗种植体,下颌 25 颗种植体。大多数患者的生物型为厚型(#19)或中厚型(#31)。经过平均 23 个月的随访,种植体-基台交界处骨水平平均位于种植体 1.16 毫米根尖方(SD 0.42,范围 0.00-2.45),而与拔牙窝愈合相关的实际骨重塑导致骨水平平均向冠方移动 0.15 毫米。平均植入扭矩为 116Ncm(SD 53,范围 10-250)。牙乳头高度(P = 0.55)、牙冠长度(P = 0.32)、牙顶(P = 0.84)和颊舌向宽度(P = 0.38)无差异。近远中向尺寸有显著差异(P = 0.01)。种植体探诊深度为 2.59 毫米,对侧同名牙探诊深度为 2.23 毫米(P = 0.001)。与种植体相比,牙齿的菌斑明显更多(P = 0.01),但探诊出血无显著差异(P = 0.08)。72.5%的患者满意度很高,没有任何问题。

结论

超宽直径种植体具有可预测的效果,骨吸收很少。牙乳头和牙冠的尺寸与对侧天然牙相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验