Institute of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Zürich, Zollikerstrasse 107,, CH-8008, Zürich, Switzerland.
Evolution. 2018 Dec;72(12):2653-2668. doi: 10.1111/evo.13611. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
Whereas specialized pollination is well recognized to cause floral adaptation, we know little about the evolutionary impact of generalized pollination. For example, it is largely unknown whether such pollination can lead to adaptive floral divergence and to what degree pollinators with different effectiveness determine evolutionary trajectories. Here, we investigated the evolutionary consequences of combined bumblebee- and hoverfly-pollination ("generalized" pollination) in comparison with those of each individual pollinator species (specialized pollination), using fast-cycling Brassica rapa plants during seven generations of experimental evolution. Bumblebees were twice as efficient as hoverflies in pollinating B. rapa flowers, but phenotypic selection and evolutionary change in plants with generalized pollination was different from both bumblebee- and hoverfly-pollinated plants for several traits. After seven generations evolution, plants with generalized pollination resembled bumblebee-pollinated plants in having little spontaneous selfing and tall size, but were more similar to hoverfly-pollinated plants in having low floral scent emission. This unique trait combination supports the idea of a generalized-pollination ecotype, coined neither by the most efficient pollinator, nor by an evolutionary average between the changes caused by each individual pollinator. For a better understanding of such "nonadditive evolution," future research should target interactions of pollinators and their effect on phenotypic selection.
虽然专门的传粉已经被很好地认识到会导致花部适应,但我们对广义传粉的进化影响知之甚少。例如,我们还不知道这种传粉是否会导致适应性花部分歧,以及不同有效程度的传粉者在多大程度上决定了进化轨迹。在这里,我们使用快速循环的甘蓝型油菜植物进行了七个世代的实验进化,研究了熊蜂和食蚜蝇传粉(“广义”传粉)与每个单独的传粉者物种(专门化传粉)的进化后果。熊蜂在为油菜传粉方面比食蚜蝇效率高两倍,但在几个性状上,具有广义传粉的植物的表型选择和进化变化与熊蜂和食蚜蝇传粉的植物都不同。经过七代进化,具有广义传粉的植物在自发自交和高大方面与熊蜂传粉的植物相似,但在花香散发方面与食蚜蝇传粉的植物更为相似。这种独特的性状组合支持了广义传粉生态型的概念,它既不是由最有效的传粉者形成的,也不是由每个单独的传粉者引起的变化的进化平均值形成的。为了更好地理解这种“非加性进化”,未来的研究应该针对传粉者的相互作用及其对表型选择的影响。