• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对格兰特 - 斯特宾斯花部进化传粉者转移模型的一项测试。

A test of the Grant-Stebbins pollinator-shift model of floral evolution.

作者信息

Moir Matthew, Butler Hannah, Peter Craig, Dold Tony, Newman Ethan

机构信息

Department of Botany, Rhodes University, Makhanda, 6140, South Africa.

出版信息

New Phytol. 2025 Mar;245(5):2322-2335. doi: 10.1111/nph.20373. Epub 2025 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1111/nph.20373
PMID:39794298
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11798893/
Abstract

Pollinators are thought to play a key role in driving incipient speciation within the angiosperms. However, the mechanisms underlying floral divergence in plants with generalist pollination systems, remains understudied. Brunsvigia gregaria displays significant geographical variation in floral traits and are visited by diverse pollinator communities. Because pollinators are often shared between populations, we investigated whether specific pollinators are responsible for driving floral divergence between them. Three distinct ecotypes were identified, each dominated by three different pollinators: bees, swallowtail butterflies, and long-proboscid flies. Across seven populations, we found a pattern of association between style length and the morphology of pollinators that visit the flowers most frequently and contact the reproductive parts most often. Furthermore, we found significant linear, quadratic and correlational selection on flower number, tepal length and style length within the butterfly- and bee-dominated populations. We also found partial evidence for divergent selection on these traits between experimental sites. Our findings suggest that a handful of key pollinators that vary in their importance have the potential to drive population-level divergence in floral traits, which may lead to pollination ecotype formation.

摘要

传粉者被认为在被子植物的初始物种形成过程中发挥着关键作用。然而,对于具有泛化传粉系统的植物,其花部差异背后的机制仍未得到充分研究。群居布氏鸢尾在花部特征上表现出显著的地理变异,且有不同的传粉者群落对其进行访花。由于传粉者通常在不同种群间共享,我们研究了特定传粉者是否导致了不同种群间的花部差异。我们识别出了三种不同的生态型,每种生态型由三种不同的传粉者主导:蜜蜂、燕尾蝶和长喙蝇。在七个种群中,我们发现花柱长度与最常访花并最常接触生殖部位的传粉者形态之间存在关联模式。此外,在以蝴蝶和蜜蜂为主导的种群中,我们发现了对花数量、花被片长度和花柱长度的显著线性、二次和相关选择。我们还发现了实验地点之间在这些性状上存在趋异选择的部分证据。我们的研究结果表明,少数重要性不同的关键传粉者有可能推动花部性状的种群水平差异,这可能导致传粉生态型的形成。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81b/11798893/913731566517/NPH-245-2322-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81b/11798893/c5e2fed10698/NPH-245-2322-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81b/11798893/6e6fa4bd3042/NPH-245-2322-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81b/11798893/46c684a963da/NPH-245-2322-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81b/11798893/9a9d3c9699d9/NPH-245-2322-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81b/11798893/31a889af9134/NPH-245-2322-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81b/11798893/df257d6c2237/NPH-245-2322-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81b/11798893/913731566517/NPH-245-2322-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81b/11798893/c5e2fed10698/NPH-245-2322-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81b/11798893/6e6fa4bd3042/NPH-245-2322-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81b/11798893/46c684a963da/NPH-245-2322-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81b/11798893/9a9d3c9699d9/NPH-245-2322-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81b/11798893/31a889af9134/NPH-245-2322-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81b/11798893/df257d6c2237/NPH-245-2322-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d81b/11798893/913731566517/NPH-245-2322-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
A test of the Grant-Stebbins pollinator-shift model of floral evolution.对格兰特 - 斯特宾斯花部进化传粉者转移模型的一项测试。
New Phytol. 2025 Mar;245(5):2322-2335. doi: 10.1111/nph.20373. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
2
Matching floral and pollinator traits through guild convergence and pollinator ecotype formation.通过类群趋同和传粉者生态型形成来匹配花与传粉者的特征。
Ann Bot. 2014 Jan;113(2):373-84. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct203. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
3
A pollinator shift explains floral divergence in an orchid species complex in South Africa.传粉者转变解释了南非一种兰花物种复合体中的花部趋异现象。
Ann Bot. 2014 Jan;113(2):277-88. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct216. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
4
Geographical differentiation in floral traits across the distribution range of the Patagonian oil-secreting Calceolaria polyrhiza: do pollinators matter?巴塔哥尼亚分泌油脂的多根蒲包花分布范围内花部性状的地理分化:传粉者重要吗?
Ann Bot. 2014 Jan;113(2):251-66. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct239. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
5
Floral traits and their connection with pollinators and climate.花的特征及其与传粉者和气候的联系。
Ann Bot. 2025 Feb 8;135(1-2):125-140. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcae046.
6
Pollinator-driven ecological speciation in plants: new evidence and future perspectives.传粉者驱动的植物生态物种形成:新证据与未来展望。
Ann Bot. 2014 Jan;113(2):199-211. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct290.
7
Selection of trait combinations through bee and fly visitation to flowers of Polemonium foliosissimum.通过蜜蜂和蝇类访问花瓣细长的 Polemonium foliosissimum 花朵来选择特征组合。
J Evol Biol. 2014 Feb;27(2):325-36. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12295. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
8
Do pollinator distributions underlie the evolution of pollination ecotypes in the Cape shrub Erica plukenetii?传粉者分布是否是开普灌木埃丽卡普卢克内蒂(Erica plukenetii)授粉生态型进化的基础?
Ann Bot. 2014 Jan;113(2):301-15. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct193. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
9
Intraspecific divergence and convergence of floral tube length in specialized pollination interactions.专化传粉相互作用中花管长度的种内分歧与趋同
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Nov 22;281(1795). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1420.
10
Linking divergence in phenotypic selection on floral traits to divergence in local pollinator assemblages in a pollination-generalized plant.将花部性状表型选择差异与传粉泛化植物中局部传粉者组合的差异联系起来。
J Evol Biol. 2024 Nov 2;37(11):1312-1328. doi: 10.1093/jeb/voae115.

本文引用的文献

1
Adaptive generalization in pollination systems: Hawkmoths increase fitness to long-tubed flowers, but secondary pollinators remain important.传粉系统中的适应性泛化:天蛾提高了对长管花的适应性,但次要传粉者仍然很重要。
Ecol Evol. 2024 May 22;14(5):e11443. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11443. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Evolution of intraspecific floral variation in a generalist-specialist pollination system.泛化-特化传粉系统中种内花部变异的演化
J Evol Biol. 2024 Dec 2;37(12):1474-1487. doi: 10.1093/jeb/voae028.
3
Components of local adaptation and divergence in pollination efficacy in a coevolving species interaction.
在协同进化的物种相互作用中,传粉功效的局部适应和分化的组成部分。
Ecology. 2023 Jun;104(6):e4043. doi: 10.1002/ecy.4043. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
4
Secondary pollinators contribute to reproductive success of a pink-flowered sand verbena population.次级传粉者有助于粉花海滩马鞭草种群的繁殖成功。
Ecology. 2023 Apr;104(4):e3977. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3977. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
5
Pollinator type strongly impacts gene flow within and among plant populations for six Neotropical species.传粉者类型强烈影响了 6 种新热带物种的植物种群内和种群间的基因流动。
Ecology. 2023 Jan;104(1):e3845. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3845. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
6
Why honeybees are poor pollinators of a mass-flowering plant: Experimental support for the low pollen quality hypothesis.为什么蜜蜂是大规模开花植物的劣质传粉者:对低花粉质量假说的实验支持。
Am J Bot. 2022 Aug;109(8):1305-1312. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.16036. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
7
Analytical results for directional and quadratic selection gradients for log-linear models of fitness functions.适应度函数的对数线性模型的方向和二次选择梯度的分析结果。
Evolution. 2022 Jul;76(7):1378-1390. doi: 10.1111/evo.14486. Epub 2022 May 18.
8
Pollinator Community Predicts Trait Matching between Oil-Producing Flowers and a Guild of Oil-Collecting Bees.传粉媒介群落预测产油花与采油蜂类群之间的性状匹配。
Am Nat. 2021 Dec;198(6):750-758. doi: 10.1086/717050. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
9
Fly pollination drives convergence of flower coloration.蝇类传粉驱动花部颜色趋同。
New Phytol. 2022 Jan;233(1):52-61. doi: 10.1111/nph.17696. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
10
Flower Color Evolution and the Evidence of Pollinator-Mediated Selection.花色进化与传粉者介导的选择证据
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jul 26;12:617851. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.617851. eCollection 2021.