Department of Clinical, Educational, and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium.
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 26;8(1):14400. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32775-7.
The current study investigated the effects of social interactions on effortful control (EC) and mentalizing in individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD) features. 123 nonclinical participants completed the emotional Stroop task to assess EC and the modified Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) to assess mentalizing capacities before and after having social interactions. The Cyberball paradigm was used to generate socially inclusive and exclusive interactions. Results indicated the high BPD group made more errors on the Stroop task following exclusive social interactions than the low BPD group. The high BPD group, compared to the low BPD group, associated fewer emotional words with facial cues following inclusive social interactions but overanalysed facial cues (hypermentalizing) following the exclusive social interaction. Exclusive social interactions hindered the inhibitory capacities in individuals with high BPD features, but inclusive social interactions facilitated. Individuals with high BPD features responded to exclusive social interactions by hypermentalizing. Thus, it was found social rejection could activate cognitive-affective processes which led to hypermentalizing and impairments in EC which in combination could explain the disruptive effects on social interactions in people with BPD features.
本研究旨在探讨社会互动对边缘型人格障碍(BPD)特征个体的努力控制(EC)和心理化的影响。123 名非临床参与者在进行社会互动之前和之后完成了情绪 Stroop 任务,以评估 EC,以及改良的“读心在眼测试”(RMET),以评估心理化能力。Cyberball 范式用于产生社交包容和排斥的互动。结果表明,在排斥性社会互动后,高 BPD 组在 Stroop 任务中的错误比低 BPD 组更多。与低 BPD 组相比,高 BPD 组在包容性社会互动后,将较少的情绪词与面部线索联系起来,但在排斥性社会互动后,对面部线索的过度分析(过度心理化)。排斥性社会互动阻碍了高 BPD 特征个体的抑制能力,但包容性社会互动促进了这种能力。高 BPD 特征个体对排斥性社会互动的反应是过度心理化。因此,研究发现社会排斥可能激活认知情感过程,导致过度心理化和 EC 受损,这两者结合可能解释了 BPD 特征个体在社会互动中出现破坏性行为的原因。