RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr;54(2):502-508. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13056. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
To evaluate the dimensionality of hospital quality indicators treated as unidimensional in a prior publication.
DATA SOURCE/STUDY DESIGN: Pooled cross-sectional 2010-2011 Hospital Compare data (10/1/10 and 10/1/11 archives) and the 2012 American Hospital Association Annual Survey.
We used 71 indicators of structure, process, and outcomes of hospital care in a principal component analysis of Ridit scores to evaluate the dimensionality of the indicators. We conducted an exploratory factor analysis using only the indicators in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Hospital Value-Based Purchasing.
There were four underlying dimensions of hospital quality: patient experience, mortality, and two clinical process dimensions.
Hospital quality should be measured using a variety of indicators reflecting different dimensions of quality. Treating hospital quality as unidimensional leads to erroneous conclusions about the performance of different hospitals.
评估先前出版物中视为单维的医院质量指标的维度。
数据来源/研究设计:2010-2011 年医院比较数据的汇总横断面数据(10/1/10 和 10/1/11 档案)和 2012 年美国医院协会年度调查。
我们使用医院护理结构、过程和结果的 71 个指标的 Ridit 评分主成分分析来评估指标的维度。我们仅使用医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的医院价值购买计划中的指标进行探索性因素分析。
医院质量有四个潜在维度:患者体验、死亡率和两个临床过程维度。
应使用反映质量不同维度的各种指标来衡量医院质量。将医院质量视为单维会导致对不同医院绩效的错误结论。