Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Magn Reson Med. 2019 Jan;81(1):514-523. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27397. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
To investigate limitations of partial Fourier acquisition in phase-contrast MRI of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE).
To assess the validity of partial Fourier reconstruction of TKE and phase images, computational fluid dynamics data of mean and turbulent velocities in a stenotic U-bend phantom was used. Partial Fourier acquisition with 75% k-space coverage was simulated and TKE data were reconstructed using zero-filling, homodyne reconstruction, and the method of projections onto convex sets (POCS). Results were compared to data from fully sampled k-space and 75% symmetric sampling. In addition, compressed sensing (CS) reconstruction was compared for a standard variable density sampling pattern and a variable density sampling pattern combined with 75% partial Fourier. For illustration purposes, in vivo examples of velocity magnitude and TKE maps of aortic flow reconstructed with the different methods are provided.
In accordance with theory, partial Fourier reconstruction of TKE maps from phase-contrast data results in artifacts relative to fully sampled data. It is demonstrated that neither homodyne reconstruction nor POCS can improve reconstruction of TKE data with respect to zero-filling reconstruction when compared to ground-truth (RMS error: 4.70%, 4.34%, and 2.45% for homodyne, POCS, and zero-filling reconstruction of in vivo data, respectively). CS reconstruction from data acquired with partial Fourier did not recover the resolution loss incurred by partial Fourier sampling.
Partial Fourier reconstruction of TKE maps from phase-contrast data does not yield a benefit over zero-filling reconstruction. In consequence, symmetric sampling is preferred over partial Fourier acquisition for a given number of phase-encodes in phase-contrast MRI.
研究部分傅里叶采集在湍流动能耗散(TKE)的相位对比 MRI 中的局限性。
为了评估 TKE 和相位图像部分傅里叶重建的有效性,使用狭窄 U 形弯管模型中的平均速度和湍流动态的计算流体动力学数据。模拟了 75%的 k 空间覆盖率的部分傅里叶采集,并使用零填充、同相重建和凸集投影法(POCS)重建 TKE 数据。结果与完全采样 k 空间和 75%对称采样的数据进行了比较。此外,还对标准变密度采样模式和与 75%部分傅里叶相结合的变密度采样模式的压缩感知(CS)重建进行了比较。为了说明问题,提供了用不同方法重建的主动脉血流速度幅度和 TKE 图谱的体内实例。
根据理论,与完全采样数据相比,从相位对比数据中部分傅里叶重建 TKE 图谱会导致伪影。与零填充重建相比,同相重建和 POCS 都不能改善 TKE 数据的重建,这一点在与真实数据的比较中得到了证明(同相、POCS 和零填充重建体内数据的均方根误差分别为 4.70%、4.34%和 2.45%)。部分傅里叶采集的数据进行 CS 重建并不能恢复部分傅里叶采样所导致的分辨率损失。
从相位对比数据中部分傅里叶重建 TKE 图谱并不能带来比零填充重建更好的效果。因此,在相位对比 MRI 中,对于给定数量的相位编码,对称采样比部分傅里叶采集更优。