Suppr超能文献

肝内胆管细胞癌患者的治疗机构容量、治疗类型与总体生存的相关性。

Association between treatment facility volume, therapy types and overall survival in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, SC, USA.

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

HPB (Oxford). 2019 Mar;21(3):379-386. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Sep 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To determine the association between the number of patients with intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) treated annually at a treatment facility (volume) and overall survival (outcome).

METHODS

Patients with IHCC reported to the National Cancer Database (years 2004-2015) were included. We classified facilities by tertiles (T; mean IHCC patients treated/year): T1: <2.56; T2: 2.57-5.39 and T3: ≥5.40. Volume-outcome relationship was determined by using Cox regression adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, tumor characteristics, insurance type and therapy received.

RESULTS

There were 11,344 IHCC patients treated at 1106 facilities. On multivariable analysis, facility volume was independently associated with all-cause mortality (p < 0.001). The unadjusted median OS by facility volume was: T1: 5 months (m), T2: 8.1 m, and T3: 13.1 m (p < 0.001). Compared with patients treated at T3 facilities, patients treated at lower-tertile facilities had significantly higher risk of death [T2 hazard ratio (HR), 1.12 [95% CI, 1.05-1.23]; T1 HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.11-1.33]. Patients treated at high-volume centers were more likely to get surgery (34.6 vs 13.1%) and adjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSION

IHCC patients treated at high-volume facilities had a significant improvement in OS and were more likely to receive surgery and adjuvant therapy as compared to that of patients at low-volume facilities.

摘要

背景

确定治疗机构每年治疗的肝内胆管癌(IHCC)患者数量(即“容量”)与总生存率(即“结局”)之间的关系。

方法

纳入了国家癌症数据库(2004-2015 年)报告的 IHCC 患者。我们按 tertiles(T;每年治疗的 IHCC 患者平均值)对机构进行分类:T1:<2.56;T2:2.57-5.39;T3:≥5.40。使用 Cox 回归调整患者人口统计学、合并症、肿瘤特征、保险类型和接受的治疗,确定容量与结局之间的关系。

结果

1106 家机构治疗了 11344 例 IHCC 患者。多变量分析显示,机构容量与全因死亡率独立相关(p<0.001)。按机构容量计算的未调整中位 OS 为:T1:5 个月(m),T2:8.1 m,T3:13.1 m(p<0.001)。与在 T3 机构治疗的患者相比,在低容量机构治疗的患者死亡风险显著更高[T2 风险比(HR),1.12(95%CI,1.05-1.23);T1 HR,1.21(95%CI,1.11-1.33]。在大容量中心治疗的患者更有可能接受手术(34.6% vs 13.1%)和辅助治疗。

结论

与低容量机构相比,在高容量机构治疗的 IHCC 患者 OS 显著改善,并且更有可能接受手术和辅助治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验