Tahta Mesut, Simsek Mehmet Emin, Isik Cetin, Akkaya Mustafa, Gursoy Safa, Bozkurt Murat
Katip Celebi University, Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Izmir, Turkey.
Yildirim Beyazit University, Yenimahalle State Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ankara, Turkey.
J Orthop Sci. 2019 Mar;24(2):286-289. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.08.022. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) in patients with inflammatory joint diseases (IJD) could be challenging. Several tests used for diagnosing PJI may be inaccurate due to baseline inflammatory characteristics of such diseases. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of several infection biomarkers, in a specific subgroup of patients with PJI and IJD.
From January 2014 to August 2017, patients with resisting pain at the relevant site, following total knee arthroplasty were evaluated prospectively. A total of 38 patients were undergone revision arthroplasty. Patients were categorized in terms of MSIS criteria: Patients with PJI (Group 1, n = 17) and patients without PJI (Group 2, n = 21). Serum ESR, CRP, Procalcitonin, synovial cell count, percentage of neutrophils in synovial fluid, synovial CRP, Lactoferrin, ELA-2, Thiol - Disulphide levels, BPI and the Alpha defensin test results were obtained. The results of two groups were compared and the diagnostic accuracy of each variable was evaluated.
There were 22 women, 16 men with a mean age of 67.8 ± 6.9 years. The differences were significant in all evaluated biomarkers in terms of PJI (p values of all biomarker were <0.001). Alpha defensin, Lactoferrin, ELA-2, BPI, Procalcitonin and synovial CRP were the most accurate tests with area under curve >0.90.
Our results demonstrated that IJD may not affect the accuracy of infection biomarkers in patients with PJI. Alpha defensin test, Lactoferrin, ELA-2, BPI, Procalcitonin and synovial CRP can be used in the diagnosis of PJI in patients with IJD.
炎症性关节疾病(IJD)患者的人工关节周围感染(PJI)诊断可能具有挑战性。由于此类疾病的基线炎症特征,用于诊断PJI的几种检测方法可能不准确。我们旨在评估几种感染生物标志物在特定PJI和IJD患者亚组中的准确性。
2014年1月至2017年8月,对全膝关节置换术后相关部位疼痛的患者进行前瞻性评估。共有38例患者接受了翻修关节成形术。根据MSIS标准对患者进行分类:PJI患者(第1组,n = 17)和无PJI患者(第2组,n = 21)。获取血清血沉(ESR)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、降钙素原、滑膜细胞计数、滑液中中性粒细胞百分比、滑膜CRP、乳铁蛋白、弹性蛋白酶-2(ELA-2)、硫醇-二硫键水平、杀菌/通透性增加蛋白(BPI)和α防御素检测结果。比较两组结果并评估每个变量的诊断准确性。
共有22名女性和16名男性,平均年龄67.8±6.9岁。就PJI而言,所有评估的生物标志物差异均有统计学意义(所有生物标志物的p值均<0.001)。α防御素、乳铁蛋白、ELA-2、BPI、降钙素原和滑膜CRP是曲线下面积>0.90的最准确检测方法。
我们的结果表明,IJD可能不影响PJI患者感染生物标志物的准确性。α防御素检测、乳铁蛋白、ELA-2、BPI、降钙素原和滑膜CRP可用于IJD患者PJI的诊断。