Hausman-Kedem Moran, Kosofsky Barry E, Ross Gail, Yohay Kaleb, Forrest Emily, Dennin Margaret H, Patel Reena, Bennett Kristen, Holahan James P, Ward Mary J
Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Division of Pediatric Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical College/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2018 Sep 1;40(3):367-375. doi: 10.1007/s10862-018-9642-1. Epub 2018 Jan 20.
To compare community diagnoses of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) reported by parents to consensus diagnoses made using standardized tools plus clinical observation. 87 participants (85% male, average age 7.4 years), with reported community diagnosis of ASD were evaluated using the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule) (ADOS-2), Differential Ability Scale (DAS-II), and Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS-II). Detailed developmental and medical history was obtained from all participants. Diagnosis was based on clinical consensus of at least two expert clinicians, using test results, clinical observations, and parent report. 23% of participants with a reported community diagnosis of ASD were classified as non-spectrum based on our consensus diagnosis. ASD and non-spectrum participants did not differ on age at evaluation and age of first community diagnosis. Non-verbal IQ scores and Adaptive Behavior Composite scores were significantly higher in the non-spectrum group compared to the ASD group (104.5 ± 21.7 vs. 80.1 ± 21.6, < .01; 71.1 ± 15 versus 79.5 ± 17.6, < .05, respectively). Participants enrolled with community diagnosis of PDD-NOS were significantly more likely to be classified as non-spectrum on the study consensus diagnosis than Participants with Autism or Asperger (36% versus 9.5%, Odds Ratio = 5.4, < .05). This study shows suboptimal agreement between community diagnoses of ASD and consensus diagnosis using standardized instruments. These findings are based on limited data, and should be further studied, taking into consideration the influence of DSM 5 diagnostic criteria on ASD prevalence.
比较家长报告的自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)社区诊断结果与使用标准化工具及临床观察得出的共识诊断结果。对87名报告有ASD社区诊断的参与者(85%为男性,平均年龄7.4岁),使用自闭症诊断观察量表(ADOS - 2)、差异能力量表(DAS - II)和文兰适应行为量表(VABS - II)进行评估。从所有参与者处获取详细的发育和病史。诊断基于至少两名专家临床医生的临床共识,综合测试结果、临床观察和家长报告。根据我们的共识诊断,23%报告有ASD社区诊断的参与者被归类为非谱系。ASD组和非谱系组在评估年龄和首次社区诊断年龄上无差异。非谱系组的非言语智商得分和适应行为综合得分显著高于ASD组(分别为104.5±21.7对80.1±21.6,P<.01;71.1±15对79.5±17.6,P<.05)。社区诊断为广泛性发育障碍未特定型(PDD - NOS)的参与者在研究共识诊断中被归类为非谱系的可能性显著高于自闭症或阿斯伯格综合征参与者(36%对9.5%,优势比 = 5.4,P<.05)。本研究表明ASD的社区诊断与使用标准化工具的共识诊断之间一致性欠佳。这些发现基于有限的数据,应进一步研究,同时考虑《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版(DSM 5)诊断标准对ASD患病率的影响。