Social and Cultural Anthropology, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 18, FI-00014, Finland.
Department of Psychology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02467, US.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Jan;177:282-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.08.012. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
Recent research has shown that children's sense of fairness is shaped in part by cultural practices, values, and norms. However, the specific social factors that motivate children's fairness decisions remain poorly understood. The current study combined an ethnographic approach with experimental tests of fairness (the Inequity Game) in two Chinese schools with qualitatively different practices and norms. In the "University school," children received explicit moral instruction on fairness reinforced by adults when supervising children's activities. By contrast, in the "Community school," children received less formal moral education and little adult supervision during play time, but norms of cooperation and fairness emerged through informal interactions with peers and other members of the community. Contrary to our predictions, children in both schools (N = 66) rejected both disadvantageous and advantageous allocations of resources in the test trials. However, in the very first practice trials, children from the Community school tended to reject all inequalities, whereas children from the University school tended to accept inequalities. We draw on the ethnographies of the schools to interpret these results, concluding that, despite the similarities in the experimental results, different motivations and social factors likely underlie the rejection of inequality in the two schools.
最近的研究表明,儿童的公平感部分是由文化实践、价值观和规范塑造的。然而,激励儿童公平决策的具体社会因素仍知之甚少。本研究在两所具有不同实践和规范的中国学校中,将民族志方法与公平实验测试(不公平游戏)相结合。在“大学学校”,儿童在成人监督他们的活动时,接受关于公平的明确道德教育,并得到强化。相比之下,在“社区学校”,儿童在玩耍时间接受的正规道德教育较少,成人监督也较少,但合作和公平的规范通过与同龄人及社区其他成员的非正式互动而出现。与我们的预测相反,两所学校的儿童(共 66 名)在测试试验中都拒绝了不利和有利的资源分配。然而,在最初的实践试验中,社区学校的儿童往往拒绝所有不平等,而大学学校的儿童往往接受不平等。我们借鉴学校的民族志来解释这些结果,得出结论,尽管实验结果相似,但在两所学校中,拒绝不平等的动机和社会因素可能不同。