• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会动机在分享和公平中的作用:来自威廉姆斯综合征的启示。

The role of social motivation in sharing and fairness: insights from Williams syndrome.

机构信息

Department of Educational Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.

Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Neurodev Disord. 2024 Aug 31;16(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s11689-024-09568-3.

DOI:10.1186/s11689-024-09568-3
PMID:39217324
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11365235/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sharing and fairness are important prosocial behaviors that help us navigate the social world. However, little is known about how and whether individuals with Williams Syndrome (WS) engage in these behaviors. The unique phenotype of individuals with WS, consisting of high social motivation and limited social cognition, can also offer insight into the role of social motivation in sharing and fairness when compared to typically developing (TD) individuals. The current study used established experimental paradigms to examine sharing and fairness in individuals with WS and TD individuals.

METHODS

We compared a sample of patients with WS to TD children (6-year-olds) matched by mental age (MA) on two experimental tasks: the Dictator Game (DG, Experiment 1, N = 17 WS, 20 TD) with adults modeling giving behaviors used to test sharing and the Inequity Game (IG, Experiment 2, N = 14 WS, 17 TD) used to test fairness.

RESULTS

Results showed that the WS group behaved similarly to the TD group for baseline giving in the DG and in the IG, rejecting disadvantageous offers but accepting advantageous ones. However, after viewing an adult model giving behavior, the WS group gave more than their baseline, with many individuals giving more than half, while the TD group gave less. Combined these results suggest that social motivation is sufficient for sharing and, in particular, generous sharing, as well as the self-focused form of fairness. Further, individuals with WS appear capable of both learning to be more generous and preventing disadvantageous outcomes, a more complex profile than previously known.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the present study provides a snapshot into sharing and fairness-related behaviors in WS, contributing to our understanding of the intriguing social-behavioral phenotype associated with this developmental disorder.

摘要

背景

分享和公平是重要的亲社会行为,有助于我们在社交世界中生存。然而,目前对于威廉姆斯综合征(WS)患者是否以及如何表现出这些行为知之甚少。WS 患者独特的表型由高度的社交动机和有限的社交认知组成,与典型发育(TD)个体相比,这种表型也可以深入了解社交动机在分享和公平中的作用。本研究使用既定的实验范式,研究了 WS 患者和 TD 个体的分享和公平行为。

方法

我们将 WS 患者与 TD 儿童(6 岁)进行比较,他们的心理年龄(MA)相匹配,进行了两个实验任务:独裁者游戏(DG,实验 1,N=17 WS,20 TD),成人示范给予行为,用于测试分享,以及不公平游戏(IG,实验 2,N=14 WS,17 TD),用于测试公平。

结果

结果表明,WS 组在 DG 和 IG 的基线给予方面与 TD 组行为相似,拒绝不利的提议,但接受有利的提议。然而,在观察到成人的给予行为后,WS 组的给予量超过了基线,许多个体的给予量超过了一半,而 TD 组的给予量减少了。综合这些结果表明,社交动机足以促进分享,特别是慷慨的分享,以及自我关注的公平形式。此外,WS 患者似乎能够学会更加慷慨大方,并防止不利的结果,这是一种比之前已知的更为复杂的行为模式。

结论

总之,本研究提供了 WS 患者在分享和公平相关行为方面的一个快照,有助于我们理解与这种发育障碍相关的引人入胜的社会行为表型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df8d/11365235/78789f3b990c/11689_2024_9568_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df8d/11365235/49e8eeedd38c/11689_2024_9568_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df8d/11365235/2fe37a345087/11689_2024_9568_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df8d/11365235/237431ab2118/11689_2024_9568_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df8d/11365235/78789f3b990c/11689_2024_9568_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df8d/11365235/49e8eeedd38c/11689_2024_9568_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df8d/11365235/2fe37a345087/11689_2024_9568_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df8d/11365235/237431ab2118/11689_2024_9568_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df8d/11365235/78789f3b990c/11689_2024_9568_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The role of social motivation in sharing and fairness: insights from Williams syndrome.社会动机在分享和公平中的作用:来自威廉姆斯综合征的启示。
J Neurodev Disord. 2024 Aug 31;16(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s11689-024-09568-3.
2
Toward a deeper characterization of the social phenotype of Williams syndrome: The association between personality and social drive.迈向对威廉姆斯综合征社会表型的更深入刻画:人格与社会驱动力之间的关联。
Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Aug;35(8):1838-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.04.015. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
3
Autonomic response to approachability characteristics, approach behavior, and social functioning in Williams syndrome.威廉姆斯综合征中对可接近性特征、趋近行为和社交功能的自主反应。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Nov;78:159-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.012. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
4
Characterizing associations and dissociations between anxiety, social, and cognitive phenotypes of Williams syndrome.刻画威廉姆斯综合征焦虑、社交和认知表型之间的关联与分离。
Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Oct;35(10):2403-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.06.010. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
5
Spatial exploration and navigation in Down syndrome and Williams syndrome.唐氏综合征和威廉姆斯综合征的空间探索和导航。
Cortex. 2024 Sep;178:32-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.06.004. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
6
Visual-motor integration, visual perception and motor coordination in a population with Williams syndrome and in typically developing children.威廉姆斯综合征患者与正常发育儿童的视动整合、视觉感知和运动协调能力
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2016 Oct;60(10):945-55. doi: 10.1111/jir.12328. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
7
Empathic responsiveness and helping behaviours in young children with Williams syndrome.威廉姆斯综合征幼儿的共情反应能力与帮助行为
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2016 Oct;60(10):1010-9. doi: 10.1111/jir.12302. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
8
Functional play in young children with autism and Williams syndrome: A cross-syndrome comparison.自闭症和威廉姆斯综合征幼儿的功能性游戏:跨综合征比较。
Child Neuropsychol. 2021 Jan;27(1):125-149. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2020.1804846. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
9
Explorative function in Williams syndrome analyzed through a large-scale task with multiple rewards.通过具有多种奖励的大规模任务分析威廉姆斯综合征的探索功能。
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 May-Jun;32(3):972-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.02.001. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
10
Strategies and biases in location memory in Williams syndrome.威廉姆斯综合征中位置记忆的策略与偏差
Res Dev Disabil. 2008 Sep-Oct;29(5):385-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2007.07.002. Epub 2007 Sep 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Distinct Inhibitory-Control Processes Underlie Children's Judgments of Fairness.不同的抑制控制过程是儿童公平判断的基础。
Psychol Sci. 2024 Jan;35(1):93-107. doi: 10.1177/09567976231217420. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
2
Simulating peers: Can puppets simulate peer interactions in studies on children's socio-cognitive development?模拟同伴:木偶能否在儿童社会认知发展研究中模拟同伴互动?
Child Dev. 2023 Sep-Oct;94(5):1117-1135. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13913. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
3
Social feedback enhances learning in Williams syndrome.社会反馈增强了威廉姆斯综合征患者的学习能力。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 4;13(1):164. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26055-8.
4
The ontogeny of children's social emotions in response to (un)fairness.儿童对(不)公平做出反应时社会情绪的个体发生。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Aug 31;9(8):191456. doi: 10.1098/rsos.191456. eCollection 2022 Aug.
5
Puppets facilitate attention to social cues in children with ASD.木偶有助于自闭症谱系障碍儿童关注社会线索。
Autism Res. 2021 Sep;14(9):1975-1985. doi: 10.1002/aur.2552. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
6
Williams syndrome.威廉姆斯综合征。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021 Jun 17;7(1):42. doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00276-z.
7
Autism does not Dictate Children's Lack of Sharing in a Prosocial Choice Test.自闭症并不影响儿童在亲社会选择测试中的分享行为。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2021 Jun;51(6):2029-2035. doi: 10.1007/s10803-020-04691-1.
8
Peripersonal Visuospatial Abilities in Williams Syndrome Analyzed by a Table Radial Arm Maze Task.通过桌面放射状臂迷宫任务分析威廉姆斯综合征患者的个人周边视觉空间能力
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Jul 20;14:254. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00254. eCollection 2020.
9
Examining the Diversity of Prosocial Behavior: Helping, Sharing, and Comforting in Infancy.审视亲社会行为的多样性:婴儿期的帮助、分享与安慰
Infancy. 2011 May;16(3):227-247. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2010.00041.x.
10
Ingroup bias does not influence inequity aversion in children.内群体偏见不会影响儿童的不平等厌恶感。
Dev Psychol. 2020 Jun;56(6):1080-1091. doi: 10.1037/dev0000924. Epub 2020 Apr 16.