Lininger Monica R, Leahy Theresa E, Haug Elise C, Bowman Thomas G
Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Department of Physical Therapy, Lynchburg College, Lynchburg, VA, USA.
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Aug;13(5):800-807.
A reliable measure of dynamic postural control is needed for inclusion in the sports-related concussion assessment battery. Currently, there is not a clinical gold standard. The Limits of Stability (LOS) test has potential to be a useful tool to collect objective data on important dynamic postural stability variables. Psychometric properties of the LOS test with healthy young adults are yet to be established.
HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the intra-session and test-retest reliability for the LOS on the NeuroCom® VSR Sport when performed by young adults.
Reliability study.
Twenty-seven healthy university students completed four trials of the LOS in each of two testing sessions one week apart. Relative reliability was measured within each session with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC[3,]) for Session 1 and Session 2, respectively, on each of the five dependent variables (movement velocity [MVL], directional control [DCL], maximum excursion [MXE], endpoint excursion [EPE], and reaction time [RT]) provided by the Neurocom. Test-retest reliability was assessed using a repeated-measures analysis of variance along with an ICC (3,) for relative reliability. An ICC value of 0.90 or higher was defined as having a high reliability, moderate reliability for ICC values between 0.80-0.89, and below 0.80 as questionable.
The reliability within each session for LOS composite scores for MVL, DCL, and MXE was moderate to high (ICC[3,]=0.89-0.95). These same three variables also had high levels of test-retest reliability (ICC[3,]=0.95-0.96). EPE and RT had moderate reliability over time (ICC[3,]=0.88) but differences for within session reliability.
LOS provides a reliable measure of dynamic postural control for young adults. Two trials are recommended at baseline with the first being an adaptation trial to ensure accuracy of findings. Care needs to be taken when interpreting EPE and DCL scores on post-injury tests due to a learning effect for those variables.
2c.
在与运动相关的脑震荡评估组合中,需要一种可靠的动态姿势控制测量方法。目前,尚无临床金标准。稳定性极限(LOS)测试有潜力成为收集重要动态姿势稳定性变量客观数据的有用工具。LOS测试在健康年轻成年人中的心理测量特性尚未确立。
假设/目的:本研究的目的是检验年轻成年人在NeuroCom® VSR Sport上进行LOS测试时的组内信度和重测信度。
信度研究。
27名健康大学生在相隔一周的两个测试时段中,每个时段完成四次LOS测试。在每个时段内,使用组内相关系数(ICC[3,])分别对Neurocom提供的五个因变量(运动速度[MVL]、方向控制[DCL]、最大偏移[MXE]、终点偏移[EPE]和反应时间[RT])进行相对信度测量。使用重复测量方差分析以及ICC(3,)评估重测信度以确定相对信度。ICC值为0.90或更高被定义为具有高信度,ICC值在0.80 - 0.89之间为中度信度,低于0.80则信度存疑。
MVL、DCL和MXE的LOS综合得分在每个时段内的信度为中度到高度(ICC[3,]=0.89 - 0.95)。这三个相同变量的重测信度也很高(ICC[3,]=0.95 - 0.96)。EPE和RT随时间具有中度信度(ICC[3,]=0.88),但在时段内信度存在差异。
LOS为年轻成年人提供了可靠的动态姿势控制测量方法。建议在基线时进行两次测试,第一次为适应性测试以确保结果的准确性。由于这些变量存在学习效应,在解释损伤后测试中的EPE和DCL分数时需谨慎。
2c。