a Coastal and Freshwater Group, Cawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand.
c Institute of Marine Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Genome. 2019 Mar;62(3):137-146. doi: 10.1139/gen-2018-0021. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
Molecular techniques may provide effective tools to enhance marine biosecurity surveillance. Prior to routine implementation, evidence-based consideration of their benefits and limitations is needed. In this study, we assessed the efficiency and practicality of visual diver surveys and real-time PCR assays (targeting DNA and RNA) for detecting two marine invasive species whose infestation levels varied between species and location: and . Filtered water samples ( = 171) were collected in parallel with dive surveys at two locations as part of the New Zealand Marine High Risk Site Surveillance programme: Nelson Harbour (27 sites) and Waitemata Harbour (30 sites). Diver surveys resulted in a greater number of detections compared to real-time PCR: - 21 versus 5 sites in Nelson, 6 versus 1 in Auckland; - 18 versus 10 in Auckland, no detections in Nelson. Occupancy modelling derived detection probabilities for the real-time PCR for were low (14%), compared to (66%). This could be related to abundances, or species-specific differences in DNA shedding. Only one RNA sample was positive, suggesting that most detections were from extracellular DNA or non-viable fragments. While molecular methods cannot yet replace visual observations, this study shows they provide useful complementary information.
分子技术可能为增强海洋生物安保监测提供有效工具。在常规实施之前,需要基于证据来考虑其优势和局限性。在本研究中,我们评估了目视潜水调查和实时 PCR 检测(针对 DNA 和 RNA)两种海洋入侵物种的效率和实用性,这些物种的感染水平在物种和地点之间存在差异: 和 。作为新西兰海洋高风险地点监测计划的一部分,在两个地点(纳尔逊港[27 个地点]和怀塔基港[30 个地点])与潜水调查同时采集了过滤水样本(=171)。与实时 PCR 相比,潜水调查的检测数量更多:在纳尔逊港, 为 21 比 5 个地点,在奥克兰为 6 比 1 个地点;在奥克兰, 为 18 比 10 个地点,在纳尔逊没有检测到。实时 PCR 对 的检出概率较低(14%),而 则为 66%。这可能与丰度或物种特异性的 DNA 脱落差异有关。只有一个 RNA 样本呈阳性,表明大多数检测结果来自细胞外 DNA 或无活力片段。虽然分子方法尚不能替代目视观察,但本研究表明它们提供了有用的补充信息。