Amodio Emanuele, d'Oro Luca Cavalieri, Chiarazzo Elisabetta, Picco Carlo, Migliori Maurizio, Trezzi Isabella, Lopez Silvano, Rinaldi Oliviero, Giupponi Massimo
Health Protection Agency of Brianza (Italy), Viale Elvezia n.2 Monza (MB) 20900.
AREU-Urgency Emergency Regional Agency, Lombardy.
AIMS Public Health. 2018 Jun 29;5(3):217-224. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2018.3.217. eCollection 2018.
Hospital emergency departments (ED) can contribute to improve health outcomes and reduce costs of health care system. This study evaluated ED admissions during a twelve months period, analyzing characteristics of patients who underwent to emergency care in order to understand factors involved in ED overcrowding and promote adequate management. This retrospective study analyzed a twelve months window, with in-depth focus on December/January when almost all EDs reported overcrowding. All ED admissions were recorded in electronic schedules including: demographic characteristics, time/date of the access, incoming triage code, diagnosis, performed procedures, discharge, time/date of discharge. A backward multivariable logistic regression model was used to estimate relationships between investigated variables and ED pattern mortality. A total of 416,299 ED admissions were analyzed. During the overcrowded period there was an increase in patients admissions (+32 patients per day, = 0.0079) with a statistically significant rise of critical patients (+1.7% yellow codes and +0.7% red codes, < 0.001) and older subjects (+1.4% patients aged 75 or more years, < 0.001). Moreover, there were statistically significant increases in waiting times and in length of visits, a higher percentage of patients who were hospitalized (13.3% 12.2%, < 0.001), left ED (4.46% 4.15%, < 0.001) and died (0.27% 0.17%, < 0.0001). This latter result maintained a marginal statistical significance (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.98-1.38, = 0.075) after adjustment for confounding. Our study highlights that ED crowding can determine measurable worsening in ED services and patient outcomes as mortality, waiting times, lengths of stay, percentage of abandonment without being seen and, probably, costs. Thus, address ED crowding has to be considered an important public health priority requiring policymakers involvement.
医院急诊科有助于改善健康状况并降低医疗保健系统的成本。本研究评估了十二个月期间的急诊科入院情况,分析了接受急诊护理的患者特征,以了解急诊科过度拥挤的相关因素并促进适当管理。这项回顾性研究分析了一个十二个月的时间段,特别关注12月/1月,当时几乎所有急诊科都报告了过度拥挤的情况。所有急诊科入院情况都记录在电子日程表中,包括:人口统计学特征、就诊时间/日期、入院分诊代码、诊断、执行的程序、出院情况、出院时间/日期。使用向后多变量逻辑回归模型来估计研究变量与急诊科模式死亡率之间的关系。共分析了416,299例急诊科入院情况。在过度拥挤期间,患者入院人数增加(每天增加32例患者,P = 0.0079),危急患者(黄色代码增加1.7%,红色代码增加0.7%,P < 0.001)和老年患者(75岁及以上患者增加1.4%,P < 0.001)有统计学显著增加。此外,等待时间和就诊时长有统计学显著增加,住院患者的百分比更高(13.3%对12.2%,P < 0.001),离开急诊科的患者(4.46%对4.15%,P < 0.001)和死亡患者(0.27%对0.17%,P < 0.0001)也有增加。在对混杂因素进行调整后,后一结果仍保持边际统计学显著性(OR = 1.16,95%CI = 0.98 - 1.38,P = 0.075)。我们的研究强调,急诊科拥挤会导致急诊科服务和患者结局出现可衡量的恶化,如死亡率、等待时间、住院时长、未就诊即放弃治疗的百分比以及可能的成本。因此,解决急诊科拥挤问题必须被视为一项重要的公共卫生优先事项,需要政策制定者的参与。