Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany.
Medical Scientific Affairs, B.Braun Melsungen AG, Berlin, Germany.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 1;93(2):181-188. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27724. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
This prospective, observational all-comers registry assessed the safety and efficacy of a Drug Coated Balloon-only strategy (DCB-only) in patients with coronary lesions.
Data regarding the performance of a DCB-only approach, especially in patients with previously untreated de-novo coronary artery disease (CAD), are still limited.
This study was conducted as an international, multicenter registry primarily enrolling patients with de-novo CAD. However, it was also possible to include patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). The primary endpoint was the rate of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) after 9 months.
A total of 1,025 patients with a mean age of 64.0 ± 11.2 years were enrolled. The majority of treated lesions were de-novo (66.9%), followed by drug-eluting-stent ISR (DES-ISR; 22.6%) and bare-metal-stent ISR (BMS-ISR; 10.5%). The TLR rate was lower in the de-novo group (2.3%) when compared to BMS- (2.9%) and DES-ISR (5.8%) (P = 0.049). Regarding MACE, there was a trend toward fewer events in the de-novo group (5.6%) than in the BMS- (7.8%) and DES-ISR cohort (9.6%) (P = 0.131). Subgroup analyses revealed that lesion type (95% CI 1.127-6.587); P = 0.026) and additional stent implantation (95% CI 0.054-0.464; P = 0.001) were associated with higher TLR rates.
Our results show that DCB-only angioplasty of de-novo coronary lesions is associated with low MACE and TLR rates. Thus, DCBs appear to be an attractive alternative for the interventional, stentless treatment of suitable de-novo coronary lesions.
本前瞻性、观察性的所有患者登记研究评估了单纯药物涂层球囊(DCB)策略在冠状动脉病变患者中的安全性和疗效。
关于单纯 DCB 治疗方法的表现的数据,特别是在未经治疗的初发冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者中,仍然有限。
本研究主要招募初发 CAD 患者,作为一项国际性、多中心登记研究进行。然而,也可以包括支架内再狭窄(ISR)患者。主要终点是 9 个月时临床驱动的靶病变血运重建(TLR)率。
共纳入 1025 名平均年龄为 64.0±11.2 岁的患者。接受治疗的病变大多数为初发(66.9%),其次是药物洗脱支架 ISR(DES-ISR;22.6%)和裸金属支架 ISR(BMS-ISR;10.5%)。与 BMS-ISR(2.9%)和 DES-ISR(5.8%)相比,初发组的 TLR 率较低(2.3%)(P=0.049)。关于 MACE,初发组(5.6%)的事件发生率低于 BMS-(7.8%)和 DES-ISR 组(9.6%)(P=0.131),有下降趋势。亚组分析显示,病变类型(95%CI 1.127-6.587);P=0.026)和额外支架植入(95%CI 0.054-0.464;P=0.001)与更高的 TLR 率相关。
我们的结果表明,单纯 DCB 血管成形术治疗初发冠状动脉病变与较低的 MACE 和 TLR 率相关。因此,DCB 似乎是一种有吸引力的替代方法,用于介入治疗,无支架治疗合适的初发冠状动脉病变。