Levine S D, Jacoby M
Am J Physiol. 1987 Feb;252(2 Pt 2):F357-60. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.1987.252.2.F357.
We have reported that Pf/Pd(w) (the ratio of osmotic and diffusional water permeabilities) for the luminal membrane of toad urinary bladder is approximately 17 for tissues stimulated with either vasopressin or 8-bromoadenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (8-BrcAMP). In a recent abstract, Kachadorian and co-workers have shown that tissues stimulated with adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP) or forskolin have a lower Pf than would be anticipated from the frequency of aggregates visualized on the flat portion of the luminal membrane using freeze-fracture electron microscopy. We report here measurements of Pf/Pd(w) for the luminal membrane of tissues receiving these agents: Pf/Pd(w) for submaximally stimulated tissues was the same, regardless of whether the stimulant was vasopressin (12.7 +/- 0.3), forskolin (13.7 +/- 0.9), or cAMP (12.0 +/- 1.3). The calculated Pd(w)'s for the series barrier were also identical (6.8 +/- 0.5, 6.5 +/- 0.3, and 8.2 +/- 1.0 X 10(-4) cm/s respectively). Our data, taken together with those of Kachadorian et al. are consistent with a number of possibilities: because our methodology does not permit estimation of Pf for the series barrier, we cannot rule out the possibility of a "post-luminal barrier" that is rate-limiting for Pf, but not for Pd(w) in forskolin- and cAMP-stimulated tissues, Pf and Pd(w) of the luminal surface aggregates could decrease in parallel, so that luminal membrane Pf/Pd(w) remains constant, and there could be a diminished frequency of fused aggregate-rich aggrephores, but not of aggregates that are on the flat portion of the luminal membrane. Only the latter can be unequivocally quantitated using freeze-fracture electron microscopy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
我们曾报道,用血管加压素或8-溴腺苷3',5'-环磷酸(8-BrcAMP)刺激蟾蜍膀胱管腔膜时,其Pf/Pd(w)(渗透水通透性与扩散水通透性之比)约为17。在最近的一篇摘要中,卡查多里安及其同事表明,用腺苷3',5'-环磷酸(cAMP)或福斯高林刺激的组织,其Pf低于根据冷冻断裂电子显微镜在管腔膜平坦部分观察到的聚集频率所预期的值。我们在此报告了接受这些药物刺激的组织管腔膜Pf/Pd(w)的测量结果:无论刺激物是血管加压素(12.7±0.3)、福斯高林(13.7±0.9)还是cAMP(12.0±1.3),亚最大刺激组织的Pf/Pd(w)都是相同的。该系列屏障的计算Pd(w)也相同(分别为6.8±0.5、6.5±0.3和8.2±1.0×10⁻⁴cm/s)。我们的数据与卡查多里安等人的数据综合起来,符合多种可能性:由于我们的方法不允许估计该系列屏障的Pf,我们不能排除存在“管腔后屏障”的可能性,该屏障对福斯高林和cAMP刺激组织中的Pf起限速作用,但对Pd(w)不起限速作用;管腔表面聚集物的Pf和Pd(w)可能平行降低,从而使管腔膜Pf/Pd(w)保持恒定;富含融合聚集物的聚集小体的频率可能降低,但管腔膜平坦部分的聚集物频率不会降低。只有后者可以使用冷冻断裂电子显微镜明确量化。(摘要截短于250字)