• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮椎间孔入路与经椎间孔硬膜外入路腰椎间盘突出症注射治疗的临床疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy Between Transforaminal and Interlaminar Epidural Injections in Lumbosacral Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Wooridul Spine Hospital, Seoul.

Heal & Teun Rehabilitation & Pain Clinic, Bundang, South Korea.

出版信息

Pain Physician. 2018 Sep;21(5):433-448.

PMID:30282389
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Epidural injection (EI) is used to treat back or radicular pain from lumbosacral disc herniation (LDH). Although several reports have stated that the transforaminal approach in EI (TFEI) has an advantage in target specificity and yields better clinical efficacy than the interlaminar approach in EI (ILEI), other studies have indicated that the clinical efficacy of ILEI was not inferior to that of TFEI and that ILEI also has the ability to spread medication into the ventral space to a degree similar to that of TFEI. There has been controversy about whether TFEI is superior to ILEI in clinical efficacy.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate whether TFEI is more useful than ILEI for achieving clinical outcomes in patients with LDH.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis using a random effects model on randomized controlled studies (RCT).

METHODS

A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane review, and KoreaMed for studies published from January 1996 until July 2017. From those found fulfilling the search criteria, manuscripts that compared the clinical efficacy of steroids and control agents, such as local anesthetics or saline, in terms of pain control and functional improvement were included in this study. Exclusion criteria included a previous history of lumbosacral surgery, non-specific low back pain, severe spinal stenosis, and severe disc degeneration. After reviewing titles, abstracts, and the full text of 6,711 studies; 12 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Data including pain scores, functional scores, and follow-up period were extracted from 10 studies and analyzed using a random effects model to obtain effect size and its statistical significance. The quality and level of evidence were analyzed in accordance with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.

RESULTS

In terms of pain control, TFEI showed significantly better short-term (2 weeks to 1 month) outcomes and slightly favorable long-term (4 - 6 month) outcomes, but without significance, in comparison with ILEI. In terms of functional improvement, TFEI also showed favorable short- and long-term outcomes, but without significance, in comparison with ILEI. TFEI had target specificity, required no additional cost and resources, and had equal applicability to ILEI. However, TFEI was more associated with a higher frequency of discomfort or adverse events during the procedure. Overall, better results were reported with TFEI over ILEI, but with low-grade evidence due to the inconsistency and imprecision of the selected studies.

LIMITATION

Analyses of safety or adverse effects could not be performed due to a lack of available data from the included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on low-grade evidence, TFEI showed significantly better short-term pain control and slightly favorable outcomes in long-term pain reduction and short- and long-term functional improvement in comparison with ILEI.

KEY WORDS

Epidural injection, interlaminar, transforaminal, meta-analysis, systemic review, pain, function.

摘要

背景

硬膜外注射(EI)用于治疗腰骶椎间盘突出症(LDH)引起的背部或神经根疼痛。尽管有几项报告表明,经椎间孔入路 EI(TFEI)在目标特异性方面具有优势,并且在临床疗效方面优于 EI 的经椎间孔入路(ILEI),但其他研究表明 ILEI 的临床疗效并不逊于 TFEI,并且 ILEI 也有能力将药物扩散到腹侧空间,程度类似于 TFEI。关于 TFEI 是否在临床疗效方面优于 ILEI 存在争议。

目的

本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在探讨 TFEI 是否比 ILEI 更能在 LDH 患者中获得临床结果。

研究设计

一项系统评价和荟萃分析,采用随机效应模型对随机对照研究(RCT)进行分析。

方法

在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 综述和 KoreaMed 中进行文献检索,检索自 1996 年 1 月至 2017 年 7 月发表的研究。从符合搜索标准的研究中,纳入了比较类固醇和对照剂(如局部麻醉剂或生理盐水)在疼痛控制和功能改善方面临床疗效的研究。排除标准包括腰骶部手术史、非特异性腰痛、严重的椎管狭窄和严重的椎间盘退变。在回顾了 6711 项研究的标题、摘要和全文后;12 项研究被纳入定性综合分析。从 10 项研究中提取疼痛评分、功能评分和随访时间等数据,并采用随机效应模型进行分析,以获得效应大小及其统计学意义。根据推荐评估、制定和评估(GRADE)方法学对质量和证据水平进行了分析。

结果

在疼痛控制方面,与 ILEI 相比,TFEI 在短期(2 周至 1 个月)结果方面表现出明显更好的结果,在长期(4-6 个月)结果方面也有稍微有利的结果,但无统计学意义。在功能改善方面,TFEI 也表现出短期和长期结果有利,但无统计学意义。TFEI 具有靶向特异性,无需额外的成本和资源,并且与 ILEI 具有同等的适用性。然而,TFEI 与手术过程中更频繁的不适或不良事件相关。总体而言,TFEI 比 ILEI 报告了更好的结果,但由于所选研究的不一致性和不精确性,证据水平较低。

局限性

由于纳入研究缺乏可用数据,因此无法进行安全性或不良影响的分析。

结论

基于低质量证据,与 ILEI 相比,TFEI 在短期疼痛控制方面表现出明显更好的结果,在长期疼痛缓解和短期及长期功能改善方面也有稍微有利的结果。

关键词

硬膜外注射、经椎间孔入路、经椎间孔入路、荟萃分析、系统评价、疼痛、功能。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Clinical Efficacy Between Transforaminal and Interlaminar Epidural Injections in Lumbosacral Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮椎间孔入路与经椎间孔硬膜外入路腰椎间盘突出症注射治疗的临床疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pain Physician. 2018 Sep;21(5):433-448.
2
Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Epidural Injection With or Without Steroid in Lumbosacral Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.硬膜外注射与不注射类固醇治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pain Physician. 2018 Sep;21(5):449-468.
3
Comparison of clinical efficacy of transforaminal and caudal epidural steroid injection in lumbar and lumbosacral disc herniation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经椎间孔硬膜外注射与骶管硬膜外注射治疗腰椎和腰骶椎间盘突出症的临床疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Spine J. 2018 Dec;18(12):2343-2353. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.06.720. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
4
Effectiveness of Transforaminal, Interlaminar, and Caudal Epidural Injections in Lumbosacral Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.经皮椎间孔入路、经椎间孔入路、经骶管硬膜外腔注射治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Pain Physician. 2023 Mar;26(2):113-123.
5
Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Transforaminal and Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection in Radicular Pain due to Cervical Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经椎间孔与椎板间硬膜外注射类固醇治疗颈椎病神经根性疼痛的临床疗效比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Pain Physician. 2022 Dec;25(9):E1351-E1366.
6
The effectiveness of lumbar interlaminar epidural injections in managing chronic low back and lower extremity pain.腰椎经椎间孔硬膜外注射治疗慢性下腰痛和下肢痛的效果。
Pain Physician. 2012 Jul-Aug;15(4):E363-404.
7
Efficacy of Epidural Injections in Managing Chronic Spinal Pain: A Best Evidence Synthesis.硬膜外注射治疗慢性脊柱疼痛的疗效:最佳证据综合分析
Pain Physician. 2015 Nov;18(6):E939-1004.
8
A Prospective Comparison of CT-Epidurogram Between Th1-Transforaminal Epidural Injection and Th1/2-Parasagittal Interlaminar Epidural Injection for Cervical Upper Limb Pain.经 Th1 椎间孔硬膜外注射与 Th1/2 经矢状旁椎间孔硬膜外注射治疗颈椎上肢痛的 CT 硬膜外造影前瞻性比较。
Pain Physician. 2019 Mar;22(2):165-176.
9
The Impact of Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae on Therapeutic Outcomes of Transforaminal Epidural Injection in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation.腰骶部移行椎对腰椎间盘突出症患者经椎间孔硬膜外注射治疗效果的影响
Pain Pract. 2016 Jul;16(6):688-95. doi: 10.1111/papr.12315. Epub 2015 May 27.
10
A Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3 Routes of Administration of Epidural Injections in Lumbar Disc Herniation.一种腰椎间盘突出症硬膜外注射 3 种给药途径的比较系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pain Physician. 2021 Sep;24(6):425-440.

引用本文的文献

1
Innovative strategies in combating intervertebral disc degeneration: pathological mechanisms and biomaterial advancements.对抗椎间盘退变的创新策略:病理机制与生物材料进展
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Aug 14;13:1643222. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1643222. eCollection 2025.
2
Results of cervical epidural steroid injections based on the physician referral source.基于医生转诊来源的颈椎硬膜外类固醇注射结果。
Interv Pain Med. 2021 Dec 6;1(1):100001. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2021.100001. eCollection 2022 Mar.
3
The role of psychosocial factors in mediating the treatment response of epidural steroid injections for low back pain with or without lumbosacral radiculopathy: A scoping review.
心理社会因素在介导硬膜外类固醇注射治疗伴或不伴腰骶神经根病的腰痛的治疗反应中的作用:一项范围综述。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 15;20(1):e0316366. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316366. eCollection 2025.
4
Association between postoperative intravenous methylprednisolone and surgical site infection in posterior lumbar fusion surgery: a retrospective single-center study.腰椎后路融合手术中术后静脉注射甲基强的松龙与手术部位感染的相关性:一项回顾性单中心研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Dec 19;25(1):1045. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08145-y.
5
Comparison of Clinical Effects and Physical Examination of Transforaminal and Caudal Steroid Injection With Targeted Catheter in Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.经皮椎间孔与骶管注射靶向治疗腰椎神经根病的临床效果和体格检查比较:一项单盲随机临床试验。
Brain Behav. 2024 Oct;14(10):e70067. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70067.
6
Comparing the clinical outcomes of lumbar transforaminal vs interlaminar epidural steroid injections in a registry cohort.在一个登记队列中比较腰椎经椎间孔与椎板间硬膜外类固醇注射的临床结果。
Interv Pain Med. 2024 Feb 25;3(1):100396. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100396. eCollection 2024 Mar.
7
Retrospective analysis of cervical transforaminal versus interlaminar epidural steroid injections.颈椎经椎间孔与椎板间硬膜外类固醇注射的回顾性分析。
Interv Pain Med. 2022 May 25;1(2):100102. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100102. eCollection 2022 Jun.
8
Acute back pain - Role of injection techniques and surgery: WFNS spine committee recommendations.急性背痛——注射技术与手术的作用:世界神经外科联合会脊柱委员会建议
World Neurosurg X. 2024 Mar 11;22:100315. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100315. eCollection 2024 Apr.
9
Multimodal management strategies for chronic pain after spinal surgery: a comprehensive review.脊柱手术后慢性疼痛的多模式管理策略:一项综合综述。
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2024 Jan;19(1):12-23. doi: 10.17085/apm.23122. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
10
Spinal Injections: A Narrative Review from a Surgeon's Perspective.脊柱注射:外科医生视角的叙述性综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 21;11(16):2355. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162355.