Suppr超能文献

依那西普治疗炎性手骨关节炎患者的多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。

Etanercept in patients with inflammatory hand osteoarthritis (EHOA): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Dec;77(12):1757-1764. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213202. Epub 2018 Oct 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Hand osteoarthritis is a prevalent disease with limited treatment options. Since joint inflammation is often present, we investigated tumour necrosis factor (TNF) as treatment target in patients with proven joint inflammation in a proof-of-concept study.

METHODS

This 1-year, double-blind, randomised, multicentre trial (NTR1192) enrolled patients with symptomatic erosive inflammatory hand osteoarthritis. Patients flaring after non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug washout were randomised to etanercept (24 weeks 50 mg/week, thereafter 25  mg/week) or placebo. The primary outcome was Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes included clinical and imaging outcomes (radiographs scored using Ghent University Scoring System (GUSS, n=54) and MRIs (n=20)).

RESULTS

Of 90 patients randomised to etanercept (n=45) or placebo (n=45), respectively, 12 and 10 discontinued prematurely. More patients on placebo discontinued due to inefficacy (6 vs 3), but fewer due to adverse effects (1 vs 6). The mean between-group difference (MD) in VAS pain was not statistically significantly different (-5.7 (95% CI -15.9 to 4.5), p=0.27 at 24 weeks; - 8.5 (95% CI -18.6 to 1.6), p=0.10 at 1  year; favouring etanercept). In prespecified per-protocol analyses of completers with pain and inflammation at baseline (n=61), MD was -11.8 (95% CI -23.0 to -0.5) (p=0.04) at 1  year. Etanercept-treated joints showed more radiographic remodelling (delta GUSS: MD 2.9 (95% CI 0.5 to 5.4), p=0.02) and less MRI bone marrow lesions (MD -0.22 (95% CI -0.35 to -0.09), p = 0.001); this was more pronounced in joints with baseline inflammation.

CONCLUSION

Anti-TNF did not relieve pain effectively after 24 weeks in erosive osteoarthritis. Small subgroup analyses showed a signal for effects on subchondral bone in actively inflamed joints, but future studies to confirm this are warranted.

摘要

目的

手骨关节炎是一种常见疾病,治疗选择有限。由于关节炎症通常存在,我们在一项概念验证研究中研究了肿瘤坏死因子 (TNF) 作为已证明存在关节炎症的患者的治疗靶点。

方法

这项为期 1 年、双盲、随机、多中心试验(NTR1192)纳入了有症状的侵蚀性炎性手骨关节炎患者。在非甾体抗炎药冲洗后出现病情加重的患者被随机分配至依那西普(24 周 50mg/周,之后 25mg/周)或安慰剂组。主要结局为 24 周时视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛。次要结局包括临床和影像学结局(使用根特大学评分系统(GUSS,n=54)和 MRI(n=20)评分的放射照片)。

结果

90 例患者随机分配至依那西普(n=45)或安慰剂(n=45)组,分别有 12 例和 10 例提前退出。更多安慰剂组患者因疗效不佳而停药(6 例 vs 3 例),但因不良反应停药的患者较少(1 例 vs 6 例)。24 周时,依那西普组和安慰剂组的 VAS 疼痛平均差值(MD)无统计学意义(-5.7(95%CI-15.9 至 4.5),p=0.27;-8.5(95%CI-18.6 至 1.6),p=0.10);1 年时,VAS 疼痛差值仍无统计学意义(-11.8(95%CI-23.0 至-0.5),p=0.04),依那西普治疗组。在基线时存在疼痛和炎症的符合方案分析的 61 例患者中,1 年时 MD 为-11.8(95%CI-23.0 至-0.5)(p=0.04)。依那西普治疗的关节显示出更多的放射学重塑(delta GUSS:MD 2.9(95%CI 0.5 至 5.4),p=0.02)和更少的 MRI 骨髓病变(MD-0.22(95%CI-0.35 至-0.09),p=0.001);在基线时有炎症的关节中,这一结果更为明显。

结论

在侵蚀性骨关节炎中,抗 TNF 治疗在 24 周后并未有效缓解疼痛。小亚组分析显示,在活跃炎症的关节中,亚软骨骨有治疗效果的信号,但需要进一步研究来证实这一点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验