Schulze Lars, Bürkner Paul-Christian, Bohländer Julian, Zetsche Ulrike
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Statistics, Faculty of Psychology, University of Münster, Münster, UK.
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 2;8(10):e022694. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022694.
Affective disturbances and difficulty in affect regulation are core features of major depressive disorder (MDD) as well as borderline personality disorder (BPD). Whereas depressed individuals are characterised by affective inertia, individuals with BPD are characterised by affective instability. Both groups have been found to use more maladaptive affect regulation strategies than healthy controls. Surprisingly, however, there have been hardly any studies directly comparing these two disorders to disentangle shared and disorder-specific deficits in affective dynamics and affect regulation.Furthermore, theoretical models link deficits in affect regulation to deficits in cognitive control functions. Given that individuals with MDD or BPD are both characterised by impairments in cognitive control, the present study will further examine the link between individual differences in cognitive control and disturbances in affect dynamics and regulation in the daily life of individuals with MDD or BPD.
We will use a smartphone application to assess negative and positive affect as well as affect regulation strategies at eight times a day for 7 days. We will further employ four computerised tasks to assess two cognitive control functions, namely interference control and discarding irrelevant information from working memory. Our hypotheses will be tested using a multimethod approach. Power analyses determined a sample size of 159 (53 MDD, 53 BPD, 53 controls) to detect medium effect sizes.
Ethics approval has been obtained from the Freie Universität Berlin. Data collection started in January 2017 and will last until the end of 2018. Results will be disseminated to relevant psychotherapeutic and patient communities in peer-reviewed journals, and at scientific conferences.
情感障碍及情感调节困难是重度抑郁症(MDD)和边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的核心特征。抑郁症患者的特点是情感惰性,而BPD患者的特点是情感不稳定。已发现这两组患者比健康对照组更多地使用适应不良的情感调节策略。然而,令人惊讶的是,几乎没有任何研究直接比较这两种障碍,以厘清情感动力学和情感调节方面的共同缺陷及特定于每种障碍的缺陷。此外,理论模型将情感调节缺陷与认知控制功能缺陷联系起来。鉴于MDD或BPD患者均具有认知控制受损的特征,本研究将进一步考察认知控制的个体差异与MDD或BPD患者日常生活中的情感动力学及调节障碍之间的联系。
我们将使用一款智能手机应用程序,在7天内每天8次评估消极和积极情感以及情感调节策略。我们还将采用四项计算机化任务来评估两种认知控制功能,即干扰控制和从工作记忆中丢弃无关信息。我们将使用多方法途径来检验我们的假设。功效分析确定样本量为159(53名MDD患者、53名BPD患者、53名对照组),以检测中等效应量。
已获得柏林自由大学的伦理批准。数据收集于2017年1月开始,将持续到2018年底。研究结果将在同行评审期刊及科学会议上向相关心理治疗和患者群体公布。