Asif Mohammad, Guntreddy Aman Sai
Department of Anesthesia, SDM Medical College, Dharwad, Karnataka, India.
Department of Anesthesia, Andhra Medical College, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Jul-Sep;12(3):711-714. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_95_18.
Tracheal intubation is usually facilitated by using a muscle relaxant to supplement drugs given for the induction of general anesthesia. Nondepolarizing muscle relaxants are also associated with the few disadvantages. Endotracheal intubation under volatile anesthetics without the use of muscle relaxants is possible, but it has disadvantages. Time available for intubation is much less when compared to the use of muscle relaxants. Considering the disadvantages of muscle relaxants and volatile agents in mind, there is a need for endotracheal intubation without muscle relaxants.
The objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of different doses of propofol for tracheal intubation - a randomized clinical trial.
A randomized study was conducted on 80 patients, comprising of 40 patients each. Patients of either sex were randomly allocated into Group P1 and Group P2 by computer-generated random numbers where Group P1 received 2 mg/kg propofol +3 μg/kg fentanyl and Group P2 received 4 mg/kg propofol +3 μg/kg fentanyl. SpO, heart rate, blood pressure (BP)- systolic BP, diastolic BP, and mean arterial pressure were recorded at 1 and 3 min after administration of study drugs were recorded. Intubating conditions were assessed modified Helbo-Hansen scoring system.
The success rate of endotracheal intubation was 62.5% and 95% in propofol 2 mg/kg + fentanyl 3 μg/kg and propofol 4 mg/kg + Fentanyl 3 μg/kg, respectively. The total incidence of hypotension was 40% and 83% in propofol 2 mg/kg + Fentanyl 3 μg/kg and propofol 4 mg/kg + Fentanyl 3 μg/kg, respectively. The incidence of hypersensitivity was noted only in propofol 4 mg/kg + Fentanyl 3 μg/kg group and was 2.5%.
We conclude that endotracheal intubation is possible in premedicated adult American Society of Anesthesiologists by Grade I patients with receiving 3 μg/kg Fentanyl + 2 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg propofol for induction without muscle relaxants, and the intubating conditions are acceptable. We found that propofol 4 mg/kg + Fentanyl 3 μg/kg is the optimal dose required for intubation without the use of muscle relaxants.
气管插管通常通过使用肌肉松弛剂来辅助用于全身麻醉诱导的药物。非去极化肌肉松弛剂也存在一些缺点。在不使用肌肉松弛剂的情况下,在挥发性麻醉剂作用下进行气管插管是可行的,但也有缺点。与使用肌肉松弛剂相比,可用于插管的时间要少得多。考虑到肌肉松弛剂和挥发性药物的缺点,需要在不使用肌肉松弛剂的情况下进行气管插管。
本研究的目的是评估不同剂量丙泊酚用于气管插管的疗效——一项随机临床试验。
对80例患者进行了一项随机研究,每组40例。通过计算机生成的随机数将男女患者随机分为P1组和P2组,其中P1组接受2mg/kg丙泊酚+3μg/kg芬太尼,P2组接受4mg/kg丙泊酚+3μg/kg芬太尼。在给予研究药物后1分钟和3分钟记录SpO、心率、血压(收缩压、舒张压和平均动脉压)。采用改良的Helbo-Hansen评分系统评估插管条件。
丙泊酚2mg/kg+芬太尼3μg/kg组和丙泊酚4mg/kg+芬太尼3μg/kg组的气管插管成功率分别为62.5%和95%。丙泊酚2mg/kg+芬太尼3μg/kg组和丙泊酚4mg/kg+芬太尼3μg/kg组的低血压总发生率分别为40%和83%。仅在丙泊酚4mg/kg+芬太尼3μg/kg组观察到过敏反应,发生率为2.5%。
我们得出结论,对于美国麻醉医师协会I级的成年患者,在不使用肌肉松弛剂的情况下,接受3μg/kg芬太尼+2mg/kg或4mg/kg丙泊酚诱导进行气管插管是可行的,且插管条件是可接受的。我们发现丙泊酚4mg/kg+芬太尼3μg/kg是不使用肌肉松弛剂进行插管所需的最佳剂量。