Suppr超能文献

[丙泊酚无神经肌肉阻滞插管。术前用药对芬太尼和利多卡因的影响]

[Intubation with propofol without neuromuscular blockade. Effect of premedication on fentanyl and lidocaine].

作者信息

Olmos M, Ubierna B, Ruano C

机构信息

Servicio de Anestesia, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, Hospital de Cruces, Baracaldo, Vizcaya.

出版信息

Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 1993 May-Jun;40(3):132-6.

PMID:8516523
Abstract

AIMS

Laryngotracheal reflexes, and possibilities of intubations following anaesthetic induction with propofol, with or without premedication and without neuromuscular blockade were evaluated. Hemodynamic parameters were also measured.

METHODS

Sixty ASA I-II patients were randomly allocated into 3 groups according to anaesthetic premedication. Group P: (placebo), 2 and 4 ml of saline 0.9%; group F, 4 micrograms/kg of fentanyl and 2 ml of saline 0.9%; group L, 4 micrograms/kg of fentanyl and 1.5 mg/kg of lidocaine 5%. Two point five mg/kg of propofol were administered and 45 seconds later intubation was attempted. Mandibular relaxation, visualization of the glottis, opening of the vocal chords, reflex reactions to laryngoscopy and intubation, time used, blood pressure and heart rate were evaluated.

RESULTS

Mandibular relaxation and visualization of the glottis were acceptable in all the patients. The aperture of the vocal chords was enough so as to carry out intubation in 65% (P), 100% (F) (p < 0.05) and 95% (L) (p < 0.05). Laryngeal reactivity significantly decreased (p < 0.001) from 40% (P) to 15% (F) and 10% (L). Tracheal reflexes decreased from 84.6% (P) to 55% (F) (p < 0.01) and 37% (L) (p < 0.001). Blood pressure and heart rate rose with intubation over the basal levels in group P and significantly decreased in groups F and L.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of propofol without neuromuscular blockade is inadequate for intubation since laryngotracheal reflexes are not suppressed. Besides, propofol does not prevent hemodynamic reactions. Premedication with fentanyl and/or lidocaine improves the responses not sufficiently to safely perform intubation.

摘要

目的

评估在未使用神经肌肉阻滞剂的情况下,使用或不使用术前用药,丙泊酚麻醉诱导后喉气管反射及插管的可能性。同时测量血流动力学参数。

方法

60例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为I-II级的患者根据麻醉前用药情况随机分为3组。P组(安慰剂组):2毫升和4毫升0.9%生理盐水;F组:4微克/千克芬太尼和2毫升0.9%生理盐水;L组:4微克/千克芬太尼和1.5毫克/千克5%利多卡因。给予2.5毫克/千克丙泊酚,45秒后尝试插管。评估下颌松弛情况、声门可视化程度、声带张开情况、喉镜检查和插管时的反射反应、所用时间、血压和心率。

结果

所有患者的下颌松弛和声门可视化情况均可接受。声带开口足以进行插管的比例在P组为65%,F组为100%(p<0.05),L组为95%(p<0.05)。喉反应性从P组的40%显著降低(p<0.001)至F组的15%和L组的10%。气管反射从P组的84.6%降至F组的55%(p<0.01)和L组的37%(p<0.001)。P组插管时血压和心率高于基础水平,F组和L组则显著降低。

结论

在未使用神经肌肉阻滞剂的情况下,使用丙泊酚进行插管是不足的,因为喉气管反射未被抑制。此外,丙泊酚不能预防血流动力学反应。使用芬太尼和/或利多卡因进行术前用药虽能改善反应,但仍不足以安全地进行插管。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验