Cooper Eve B, Kruuk Loeske E B
Division of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology The Australian National University Acton Canberra ACT 2601 Australia.
Evol Lett. 2018 Aug 16;2(5):460-471. doi: 10.1002/evl3.79. eCollection 2018 Oct.
What determines variation between individuals in how they senesce, and are environmental conditions experienced during development relevant to late-life performance? We report a meta-analysis of studies of wild populations to determine how the quality of the environment experienced during development affects rates of survival and reproductive senescence. From studies of 14 bird or mammal species, we calculated effect sizes for the interaction between the effects of environmental quality during development and age in predicting survival ( = 18) or reproduction ( = 30) over time in late life. We found no evidence that developmental environment affected rates of survival senescence (β = -1.2 × 10 ± 0.022SE). However, a better developmental environment was associated with slower rates of reproductive senescence in late life (β = 0.062 ± 0.023SE), indicating a small, but significant, "silver-spoon" effect of early-life conditions that persisted through to late life. Our results illustrate how the effects of environmental conditions during development can persist throughout life, and indicate one possible cause of phenotypic plasticity in senescence.
是什么决定了个体衰老方式的差异,发育过程中所经历的环境条件与晚年表现相关吗?我们报告了一项对野生种群研究的荟萃分析,以确定发育过程中所经历的环境质量如何影响生存和生殖衰老率。通过对14种鸟类或哺乳动物的研究,我们计算了发育期间环境质量的影响与年龄之间的相互作用在预测晚年生存(n = 18)或繁殖(n = 30)随时间变化方面的效应大小。我们没有发现证据表明发育环境会影响生存衰老率(β = -1.2 × 10 ± 0.022SE)。然而,更好的发育环境与晚年较慢的生殖衰老率相关(β = 0.062 ± 0.023SE),这表明早年条件存在虽小但显著的“银匙”效应,并持续到晚年。我们的结果说明了发育期间环境条件的影响如何贯穿一生,并指出了衰老中表型可塑性的一个可能原因。