Aurnhammer Felix, Först Gesche, Kern Winfried V
Abteilung Infektiologie, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg.
Apotheke, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2018 Oct;143(20):1445-1449. doi: 10.1055/a-0651-4759. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
The adequate duration of antibiotic therapy in the treatment of bacterial infections is often unclear. For many indications guidelines recommend intervals with ranges of several days instead of fixed courses of treatment, and physicians tend to choose longer rather than shorter durations. The emergence of infections due to multidrug-resistant bacteria and the valuation of avoidable side effects from antibiotic agents raised the question whether a shortened duration of therapy is appropriate in specific indications. Therefore clinical trials to investigate the effectiveness of shorter in comparison to prolonged antibiotic treatment have yet been of growing interest to current research. Recent studies have shown that, concerning clinical endpoints, shorter duration of antibiotic therapy is not inferior to longer treatment in the management of pyelonephritis, intraabdominal infections, community acquired pneumonia an also gramnegative bloodstream infections and febrile neutropenia.
在细菌感染治疗中,抗生素治疗的适当疗程往往并不明确。对于许多适应症,指南推荐的疗程范围是数天,而非固定疗程,并且医生倾向于选择较长而非较短的疗程。多重耐药菌引起的感染的出现以及对抗生素可避免副作用的评估,引发了关于在特定适应症中缩短治疗疗程是否合适的问题。因此,与延长抗生素治疗相比,研究缩短疗程有效性的临床试验已日益成为当前研究的关注点。最近的研究表明,在临床终点方面,在肾盂肾炎、腹腔内感染、社区获得性肺炎、革兰氏阴性菌血流感染以及发热性中性粒细胞减少症的治疗中,较短疗程的抗生素治疗并不逊色于较长疗程的治疗。