Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
J Anxiety Disord. 2019 Jan;61:27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
Trials of virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) for anxiety-related disorders have proliferated in number and diversity since our previous meta-analysis that examined 13 total trials, most of which were for specific phobias (Powers & Emmelkamp, 2008). Since then, new trials have compared VRET to more diverse anxiety and related disorders including social anxiety disorder (SAD), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and panic disorder (PD) with and without agoraphobia. With the availability of this data, it is imperative to re-examine the efficacy of VRET for anxiety. A literature search for randomized controlled trials of VRET versus control or in vivo exposure yielded 30 studies with 1057 participants. Fourteen studies tested VRET for specific phobias, 8 for SAD or performance anxiety, 5 for PTSD, and 3 for PD. A random effects analysis estimated a large effect size for VRET versus waitlist (g = 0.90) and a medium to large effect size for VRET versus psychological placebo conditions (g = 0.78). A comparison of VRET and in vivo conditions did not show significantly different effect sizes (g = -0.07). These findings were relatively consistent across disorders. A meta-regression analysis revealed that larger sample sizes were associated with lower effect sizes in VRET versus control comparisons (β = -0.007, p < 0.05). These results indicate that VRET is an effective and equal medium for exposure therapy.
自我们之前的荟萃分析(Powers & Emmelkamp, 2008)检查了 13 项总试验,其中大多数是针对特定恐惧症以来,虚拟现实暴露疗法(VRET)治疗与焦虑相关的障碍的试验数量和多样性不断增加。从那时起,新的试验比较了 VRET 与更广泛的焦虑和相关障碍,包括社交焦虑障碍(SAD)、创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和恐慌症(PD),包括有无广场恐惧症。有了这些数据,重新检查 VRET 治疗焦虑的疗效是当务之急。一项针对 VRET 与对照或现场暴露的随机对照试验的文献检索产生了 30 项研究,共有 1057 名参与者。14 项研究测试了 VRET 对特定恐惧症的疗效,8 项研究测试了 SAD 或表演焦虑症,5 项研究测试了 PTSD,3 项研究测试了 PD。随机效应分析估计 VRET 与候补名单相比的效果大小较大(g=0.90),与心理安慰剂条件相比的中到大效果大小(g=0.78)。VRET 与现场条件的比较并未显示出显著不同的效果大小(g=-0.07)。这些发现在各种疾病中相对一致。元回归分析表明,VRET 与对照相比的较大样本量与较低的效果大小相关(β=-0.007,p<0.05)。这些结果表明 VRET 是一种有效的、平等的暴露疗法媒介。