• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

向家庭成员反馈结果:美国基因组学研究中的职业职责

Returning Results to Family Members: Professional Duties in Genomics Research in the United States.

作者信息

Fox Dov, Spencer Emily, Torkamani Ali

出版信息

J Leg Med. 2018 Apr-Jun;38(2):201-219. doi: 10.1080/01947648.2017.1417934.

DOI:10.1080/01947648.2017.1417934
PMID:30289737
Abstract

This article critically appraises the ethical and legal duties to disclose findings to the family members of research participants. These family members stand to benefit in important ways from discoveries that can inform their own health and reproductive risks. However, careful appreciation of how medical research differs from clinical practice and of the uncertainties at stake in genomic research complicates any warning to relatives. Research laboratories should generally be immune from liability for failing to diagnose or disclose a genetic disorder in time to prevent adverse outcomes for a participant's family members or to return properly interpreted test results for even direct findings under investigation, let alone incidental ones. The only exception is where warning relatives of medical risks is very likely to prevent imminent harm and would not override known participant wishes. Genomic autopsy studies for sudden death satisfy these conditions of life-saving potential for relatives without disrespect to subjects. These are among the rare instances in which we conclude that offering results to family members is not just permissible but obligatory, not just as a moral matter but as a legal one.

摘要

本文批判性地评估了向研究参与者家属披露研究结果的伦理和法律责任。这些家属可能会从相关发现中以重要方式受益,这些发现能够告知他们自身的健康和生殖风险。然而,仔细考量医学研究与临床实践的差异以及基因组研究中所涉及的不确定性,会使向亲属发出的任何警示变得复杂。一般来说,研究实验室不应为未能及时诊断或披露基因疾病而承担责任,以防止对参与者家属造成不良后果,或者即使是针对正在调查的直接发现,更不用说偶然发现,也无需返还经过正确解读的检测结果。唯一的例外是,向亲属警示医疗风险极有可能防止即将发生的伤害,且不会违背已知的参与者意愿。针对猝死的基因组尸检研究满足为亲属带来挽救生命潜力且不冒犯受试者的这些条件。在这些罕见的情况下,我们得出结论,向家庭成员提供结果不仅是允许的,而且是义务性的,不仅在道德层面如此,在法律层面也是如此。

相似文献

1
Returning Results to Family Members: Professional Duties in Genomics Research in the United States.向家庭成员反馈结果:美国基因组学研究中的职业职责
J Leg Med. 2018 Apr-Jun;38(2):201-219. doi: 10.1080/01947648.2017.1417934.
2
Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations.向研究参与者的亲属反馈基因组结果:分析与建议。
J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Fall;43(3):440-63. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12288.
3
The return of results of deceased research participants.已故研究参与者的研究结果返还。
J Law Med Ethics. 2011 Winter;39(4):621-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00629.x.
4
Automatic Placement of Genomic Research Results in Medical Records: Do Researchers Have a Duty? Should Participants Have a Choice?基因组研究结果在医疗记录中的自动录入:研究人员有责任吗?参与者应有选择权吗?
J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Winter;43(4):827-42. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12323.
5
Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Perspectives from Managers of Two Distinct Research Biobanks.将研究参与者的基因组结果返还给亲属:来自两个不同研究生物样本库管理者的观点。
J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Fall;43(3):523-8. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12294.
6
A legal duty to disclose individual research findings to research subjects?向研究对象披露个人研究结果的法律义务?
Food Drug Law J. 2009;64(1):225-60.
7
Incidental findings: a common law approach.偶然发现:一种普通法方法。
Account Res. 2008 Oct-Dec;15(4):242-61. doi: 10.1080/08989620802388705.
8
Misusing informed consent: a critique of limitations on research subjects' access to genetic research results.滥用知情同意:对研究对象获取基因研究结果的限制的批判
Sask Law Rev. 2000;63(2):539-80.
9
To disclose, or not to disclose? Perspectives of clinical genomics professionals toward returning incidental findings from genomic research.是否披露?临床基因组学专业人员对从基因组研究中返还偶然发现的观点。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jul 27;22(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00670-y.
10
Return of results: ethical and legal distinctions between research and clinical care.结果反馈:研究与临床医疗之间的伦理和法律区别
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2014 Mar;166C(1):105-11. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31393. Epub 2014 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Research participants and stakeholders' views on feedback of genetic research findings: a qualitative study of the H3Africa Kidney Disease Research Network in Ghana.研究参与者和利益相关者对基因研究结果反馈的看法:加纳H3Africa肾脏疾病研究网络的定性研究
BMC Nephrol. 2025 Jul 8;26(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s12882-025-04295-w.
2
An Examination of the Ethical and Legal Limits in Implementing "Traceback Testing" for Deceased Patients.对实施已故患者“溯源检测”的伦理和法律限制的考察。
J Law Med Ethics. 2022;50(4):818-832. doi: 10.1017/jme.2023.23.
3
"If relatives inherited the gene, they should inherit the data." Bringing the family into the room where bioethics happens.
“如果亲属继承了基因,他们就应该继承相关数据。” 将家庭纳入生物伦理学讨论的范畴。
New Genet Soc. 2022;41(1):23-46. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2021.2007065. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
4
Legal Implications of Stroke Biobanking and Genomics Research in Sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲地区中风生物银行和基因组学研究的法律影响。
J Law Med. 2022 Jun;29(2):579-598.
5
A genetic researcher's devil's dilemma: Warn relatives about their genetic risk or respect confidentiality agreements with research participants?遗传研究员的两难困境:是警告亲属他们的遗传风险,还是尊重与研究参与者的保密协议?
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Nov 23;22(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00721-4.
6
Perspectives and ethical considerations for return of genetics and genomics research results: a qualitative study of genomics researchers in Uganda.返回遗传学和基因组学研究结果的观点和伦理考虑:乌干达基因组学研究人员的定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Nov 19;22(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00724-1.
7
2020 APHRS/HRS expert consensus statement on the investigation of decedents with sudden unexplained death and patients with sudden cardiac arrest, and of their families.2020年亚太心律学会/美国心律学会关于不明原因猝死死者及心脏骤停患者及其家属调查的专家共识声明
J Arrhythm. 2021 Apr 8;37(3):481-534. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12449. eCollection 2021 Jun.
8
2020 APHRS/HRS expert consensus statement on the investigation of decedents with sudden unexplained death and patients with sudden cardiac arrest, and of their families.2020 年 APHRS/HRS 关于猝死和心搏骤停患者及其家属尸检调查的专家共识声明
Heart Rhythm. 2021 Jan;18(1):e1-e50. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Oct 19.