School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
School of Health Sciences, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Mar;42(5):594-612. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1503737. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
Remaining physically active is important to maintain functional ability and reduce the incidence of co-morbidities in people with Multiple Sclerosis. The aim of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions on physical activity or sedentary behaviour in people with Multiple Sclerosis. A systematic search was conducted in May 2018 of the following databases: Web of Science Core Collections, Embase and Medline. Included studies were randomised controlled trials involving people with Multiple Sclerosis who completed an intervention, compared to any comparator. Outcomes included subjective or objective measures of physical activity or sedentary behaviour. Quality assessment was performed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale. Twenty-five trials were included covering 1697 participants, the majority of which had mild-moderate disability (average Physiotherapy Evidence Database score 6.2 ± 1.5). Experimental interventions included exercise prescription (5), behaviour change interventions (10), combined exercise, and behaviour change techniques (7) and education (3). Generally, subjective but not objective physical activity improved in those with mild-moderate disability. Insufficient data existed on the effectiveness on sedentary behaviour. A discrepancy seems to exists between the effectiveness of physical activity interventions in people with Multiple Sclerosis depending on whether physical activity was assessed objectively or subjectively, with the latter indicating effects. Effects on sedentary behaviour remain to be elucidated.Implications for RehabilitationRemaining physically active is important to maintain functional ability, independence, quality of life, and to reduce the incidence of co-morbidity.Exercise prescription, behaviour change interventions, combined exercise and behaviour change interventions, and health promotion education appear to subjectively improve physical activity in people with Multiple Sclerosis with mild-moderate disability, yet this is often not the case when measured objectively.There is a lack of evidence to support the effectiveness of these interventions on sedentary behaviour.
保持身体活跃对于维持多发性硬化症患者的功能能力和减少合并症的发生非常重要。本综述的目的是评估干预措施对多发性硬化症患者身体活动或久坐行为的有效性。2018 年 5 月,我们对以下数据库进行了系统检索:Web of Science 核心合集、Embase 和 Medline。纳入的研究为涉及完成干预措施的多发性硬化症患者的随机对照试验,与任何对照组进行比较。结果包括身体活动或久坐行为的主观或客观测量。使用物理治疗证据数据库量表进行质量评估。共纳入 25 项试验,涵盖 1697 名参与者,其中大多数参与者为轻度至中度残疾(平均物理治疗证据数据库评分为 6.2±1.5)。实验性干预措施包括运动处方(5 项)、行为改变干预措施(10 项)、结合运动和行为改变技术(7 项)以及教育(3 项)。一般来说,轻度至中度残疾者的主观身体活动有所改善,但客观身体活动没有改善。关于久坐行为的有效性,数据不足。多发性硬化症患者的身体活动干预措施的有效性似乎取决于身体活动是主观评估还是客观评估,后者表明存在效果。久坐行为的效果仍有待阐明。
康复意义
保持身体活跃对于维持功能能力、独立性、生活质量以及减少合并症的发生非常重要。运动处方、行为改变干预措施、结合运动和行为改变技术以及健康促进教育似乎可以主观上提高轻度至中度残疾的多发性硬化症患者的身体活动水平,但客观测量时往往并非如此。
这些干预措施对久坐行为的有效性缺乏证据支持。